Physician decision-making process about withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in paediatric patients: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
Decision-making
End-of-life care
Paediatrics
Palliative care
Perceptions
Physicians
Withhold/withdraw life-sustaining treatments
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jun 2022
24 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
07
01
2022
accepted:
07
06
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
29
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With paediatric patients, deciding whether to withhold/withdraw life-sustaining treatments (LST) at the end of life is difficult and ethically sensitive. Little is understood about how and why physicians decide on withholding/withdrawing LST at the end of life in paediatric patients. In this study, we aimed to synthesise results from the literature on physicians' perceptions about decision-making when dealing with withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in paediatric patients. We conducted a systematic review of empirical qualitative studies. Five electronic databases (Pubmed, Cinahl®, Embase®, Scopus®, Web of Science™) were exhaustively searched in order to identify articles published in English from inception through March 17, 2021. Analysis and synthesis were guided by the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. Thirty publications met our criteria and were included for analysis. Overall, we found that physicians agreed to involve parents, and to a lesser extent, children in the decision-making process about withholding/withdrawing LST. Our analysis to identify conceptual schemes revealed that physicians divided their decision-making into three stages: (1) early preparation via advance care planning, (2) information giving and receiving, and (3) arriving at the final decision. Physicians considered advocating for the best interests of the child and of the parents as their major focus. We also identified moderating factors of decision-making, such as facilitators and barriers, specifically those related to physicians and parents that influenced physicians' decision-making. By focusing on stakeholders, structure of the decision-making process, ethical values, and influencing factors, our analysis showed that physicians generally agreed to share the decision-making with parents and the child, especially for adolescents. Further research is required to better understand how to minimise the negative impact of barriers on the decision-making process (e.g., difficult involvement of children, lack of paediatric palliative care expertise, conflict with parents).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
With paediatric patients, deciding whether to withhold/withdraw life-sustaining treatments (LST) at the end of life is difficult and ethically sensitive. Little is understood about how and why physicians decide on withholding/withdrawing LST at the end of life in paediatric patients. In this study, we aimed to synthesise results from the literature on physicians' perceptions about decision-making when dealing with withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in paediatric patients.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of empirical qualitative studies. Five electronic databases (Pubmed, Cinahl®, Embase®, Scopus®, Web of Science™) were exhaustively searched in order to identify articles published in English from inception through March 17, 2021. Analysis and synthesis were guided by the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Thirty publications met our criteria and were included for analysis. Overall, we found that physicians agreed to involve parents, and to a lesser extent, children in the decision-making process about withholding/withdrawing LST. Our analysis to identify conceptual schemes revealed that physicians divided their decision-making into three stages: (1) early preparation via advance care planning, (2) information giving and receiving, and (3) arriving at the final decision. Physicians considered advocating for the best interests of the child and of the parents as their major focus. We also identified moderating factors of decision-making, such as facilitators and barriers, specifically those related to physicians and parents that influenced physicians' decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
By focusing on stakeholders, structure of the decision-making process, ethical values, and influencing factors, our analysis showed that physicians generally agreed to share the decision-making with parents and the child, especially for adolescents. Further research is required to better understand how to minimise the negative impact of barriers on the decision-making process (e.g., difficult involvement of children, lack of paediatric palliative care expertise, conflict with parents).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35751075
doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01003-5
pii: 10.1186/s12904-022-01003-5
pmc: PMC9229823
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Front Pediatr. 2021 May 14;9:686206
pubmed: 34055702
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Feb 4;20(1):27
pubmed: 33541339
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):584-592
pubmed: 33211941
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Oct 1;21(10):E913-919
pubmed: 31651392
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017 Sep 28;1(1):e000102
pubmed: 29637131
Palliat Med. 2016 Dec;30(10):920-934
pubmed: 27160700
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Aug;100(8):769-73
pubmed: 25940425
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;10(2):e13
pubmed: 28270396
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Jan - Feb;20(1):81-88
pubmed: 31376579
J Int Bioethique. 2012 Sep-Dec;23(3-4):53-66, 191-2
pubmed: 23230626
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 May;66(5):e27608
pubmed: 30623573
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Dec;33(10):935-941
pubmed: 26169522
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Sep;12(3):429-36
pubmed: 26133890
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2005 May;14(2):132-40
pubmed: 15842460
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Pediatrics. 2015 Feb;135(2):e465-76
pubmed: 25560442
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Jul 7;47(1):153
pubmed: 34233717
Ir Med J. 2020 Jun 11;113(6):95
pubmed: 32816430
Palliat Med. 2015 Apr;29(4):371-9
pubmed: 25721360
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):909-915
pubmed: 28807699
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Mar;49(3):360-71
pubmed: 21996649
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2020;77(4):195-201
pubmed: 32713952
Neurooncol Pract. 2021 Mar 12;8(4):451-459
pubmed: 34277023
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3151-3160
pubmed: 28456909
Indian J Palliat Care. 2009 Jan;15(1):30-6
pubmed: 20606853
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jun;56(6):893-899
pubmed: 31898378
J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;182:356-362
pubmed: 28040231
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Jan 06;11:1-8
pubmed: 32021536
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jul;38(1):157-60
pubmed: 19615637
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 11;18(1):74
pubmed: 29228962
Eur J Health Law. 2011 Dec;18(5):531-47
pubmed: 22128521
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Aug;17(6):656-664
pubmed: 28366529
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 19;9(8):e026579
pubmed: 31431444
J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;44(7-8):404-8
pubmed: 18638332
Palliat Med. 2015 Apr;29(4):346-53
pubmed: 25670471
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;59:283-293
pubmed: 27665411
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Aug;47(2):126-32
pubmed: 20638004
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2013 Dec;36(4):248-61
pubmed: 24001179
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Mar;180(3):949-957
pubmed: 33030601
Crit Care Clin. 2004 Jul;20(3):467-85, x
pubmed: 15183214
Children (Basel). 2018 Dec 10;5(12):
pubmed: 30544741
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):3-17
pubmed: 25970382
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 17;22(1):27
pubmed: 33731101
Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):282-8
pubmed: 18245419
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Aug;101(8):701-8
pubmed: 26801075
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;170(12):1216-1223
pubmed: 27749945
Paediatr Child Health. 2018 May;23(2):138-146
pubmed: 30653623
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Summer;30(2):131-142
pubmed: 31188790
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1391-1454
pubmed: 29032993
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Jun;164(6):547-53
pubmed: 20530305
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45
pubmed: 18616818
J Palliat Care. 2019 Apr;34(2):132-138
pubmed: 30714468
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Dec;20(12):2746-50
pubmed: 16204280
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jun;20(6):662-666
pubmed: 28186835
J Child Health Care. 2012 Jun;16(2):109-23
pubmed: 22247181
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187375
pubmed: 29095938
Pediatrics. 2017 Sep;140(3):
pubmed: 28847979
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Feb;105(2):109-114
pubmed: 31186292
Cancer Nurs. 2015 Mar-Apr;38(2):125-32
pubmed: 24945260
West J Nurs Res. 2017 Dec;39(12):1624-1638
pubmed: 27920347
Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4):e46
pubmed: 10103338
Pediatrics. 2014 Feb;133 Suppl 1:S1-7
pubmed: 24488535
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1248-52
pubmed: 15520103
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Nov;13(6):e372-6
pubmed: 23034458
J Paediatr Child Health. 2018 May;54(5):510-514
pubmed: 29266616
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;12(6):e383-5
pubmed: 21263365
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Jun;23(4):421-31
pubmed: 25736273
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):467
pubmed: 31783822
Palliat Med. 2016 Dec;30(10):960-970
pubmed: 26847523
J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;44(7-8):392-8
pubmed: 18638330
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):944-52
pubmed: 19230612
Qual Health Res. 2021 May;31(6):1083-1093
pubmed: 33135554
Pediatrics. 2020 Mar;145(3):
pubmed: 32054820
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 12;21(1):71
pubmed: 32787834
CMAJ. 1997 Mar 15;156(6):825-8
pubmed: 9084389
J Palliat Care. 2000 Oct;16 Suppl:S45-52
pubmed: 11075533
J Child Health Care. 2011 Dec;15(4):334-49
pubmed: 22199173
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 May;19(5):1252-7
pubmed: 14993486
Palliat Med. 2015 Mar;29(3):212-22
pubmed: 25389347
Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2):
pubmed: 27456510
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Oct;102(10):930-935
pubmed: 28408466
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Apr;35(4):669-676
pubmed: 28990396
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Sep;55(3):478-84
pubmed: 20658619
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):e34-44
pubmed: 23249788
Acta Paediatr. 2018 Feb;107(2):262-269
pubmed: 28793184
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):21-31
pubmed: 28949870
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Feb 19;:
pubmed: 33605030
Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):e923-9
pubmed: 22412035