Quantification and visualization of the tooth extraction effects on face with spatially dense geometric morphometrics.
extraction vs. non-extraction
facial morphological changes
geometric morphometrics
Journal
Orthodontics & craniofacial research
ISSN: 1601-6343
Titre abrégé: Orthod Craniofac Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101144387
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
revised:
12
06
2022
received:
26
03
2022
accepted:
17
06
2022
medline:
4
4
2023
pubmed:
26
6
2022
entrez:
25
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To apply geometric morphometrics and multivariate statistics to evaluate changes of the face for female Chinese patients who underwent orthodontic treatment with different type of anchorage control. Forty-six adult female patients were enrolled including 33 four first premolar extraction cases (17 patients with mini-implants for maximum anchorage control and 16 patients without mini-implants) and 13 non-extraction cases with minimum treatment duration of 15 months. Spatially dense correspondence was established among all the images The pre-and post-treatment average faces of the two extraction groups and the non-extraction group were generated. Partial least squares regression was used to test the statistical significance of the effects of treatment for different anchorage choice. The upper and lower lips were retruded significantly after treatment in the extraction groups. In the maximum anchorage control group, the temple and cheek were depressed by approximately 1 mm, and the zygomatic regions were increased in the mid-face. However, these changes were not statistically significant. In comparison, no statistically significant facial changes occurred in the non-extraction group. The anchorage choice and the removal of four first premolar extraction influence lip shape as well as the perioral regions. However, extraction treatment does not impact the appearance of the cheeks and temples on a statistically level, as compared to orthodontic treatment without premolar extractions. Spatially dense geometric morphometric facilitates comprehensive treatment effect quantification and visualization on the full facial changes for improving orthodontic outcome evaluation.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
171-177Subventions
Organisme : Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Wholley CJ, Woods MG. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:386-395.
Konstantonis D, Vasileiou D, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Soft tissue changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126:167-179.
Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:599-617.
Mitteroecker P, Gunz P. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Biol. 2009;36:235-247.
Claes P, Walters M, Clement J. Improved facial outcome assessment using a 3D anthropometric mask. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:324-330.
Matthews HS, Penington AJ, Hardiman R, et al. Modelling 3D craniofacial growth trajectories for population comparison and classification illustrated using sex-differences. Sci Rep. 2018;8:4771.
Hammond P, Suttie M. Large-scale objective phenotyping of 3D facial morphology. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:817-825.
Fan Y, Matthews H, Kilpatrick N, Claes P, Clement J, Penington A. Facial morphology and growth following surgery for congenital midline cervical cleft patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:437-441.
Hou SY, Zhou W, Dai H, Wong HM, Wen YF, Zhou J. Soft tissue facial changes among adult females during alignment stage of orthodontic treatment: a 3D geometric morphometric study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:1-9.
Xu T-M, Liu Y, Yang M-Z, Huang W. Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:672-677.
Claes P, Walters M, Vandermeulen D, Clement JG. Spatially-dense 3D facial asymmetry assessment in both typical and disordered growth. J Anat. 2011;219:444-455.
White JD, Ortega-Castrillón A, Matthews H, et al. MeshMonk: open-source large-scale intensive 3D phenotyping. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6085.
Claes P. A Robust Statistical Surface Registration Framework Using Implicit Function Representations: Application in Craniofacial Reconstruction. Fac Ingenieurswetenschappen, Dep Elektrotechniek, Afd PSI; 2007.
Anderson MJ. Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2001;58:626-639.
Lewyllie A, Roosenboom J, Indencleef K, et al. A comprehensive craniofacial study of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. J Dent Res. 2017;96:1386-1391.
Anderson M, Ter BC. Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. J Stat Comput Simul. 2003;73:85-113.
Zierhut EC, Joondeph DR, Artun J, Little RM. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:208-219.
Garner LD. Soft-tissue changes concurrent with orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:367-377.
Rose AD, Woods MG, Clement JG, Thomas CDL. Lateral facial soft-tissue prediction model: analysis using Fourier shape descriptors and traditional cephalometric methods. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2003;121:172-180.
Singh GD, Clark WJ. Localization of mandibular changes in patients with class II division 1 malocclusions treated with twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:419-425.
Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:83-89.
Franchi L, Baccetti T, Stahl F, McNamara JA. Thin-plate spline analysis of craniofacial growth in class I and class II subjects. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:595-601.
Liu Z-Y, Yu J, Dai F-F, Jiang R-P, Xu T-M. Three-dimensional changes in lip vermilion morphology of adult female patients after extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Korean J Orthod. 2019;49:222-234.
Rongo R, Nissen L, Leroy C, Michelotti A, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Three-dimensional soft tissue changes in orthodontic extraction and non-extraction patients: a prospective study. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2021;24:181-192.
Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
Coleman S, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthetic Surg J. 2006;26:S4-S9.
Oettlé AC, Demeter FP, L’abbé EN. Ancestral variations in the shape and size of the zygoma. Anat Rec. 2017;300:196-208.