Lariboisiere Hospital pre-operative surgical checklist to improve safety during transpetrosal approaches.


Journal

Acta neurochirurgica
ISSN: 0942-0940
Titre abrégé: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 0151000

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
received: 03 02 2022
accepted: 09 06 2022
pubmed: 26 6 2022
medline: 1 11 2022
entrez: 25 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Transpetrosal approaches are technically complex and require a complete understanding of surgical and radiological anatomy. A careful evaluation of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scan is mandatory, because anatomical or pathological variations are common and may increase the risk of complications related with the approach. Pre-operative characteristics of venous and petrous bone anatomy were analysed and correlated with intraoperative findings, using injected magnetic resonance imaging and thin-slices computed tomography scan. These data regularly checked before each transpetrosal approach were progressively included in the presented checklist. Transpetrosal approaches have been used in 101 patients. Items included in the checklist were petrous bone pneumatization, angle between petrous apex and clivus, dehiscence of petrous carotid artery, dehiscence of geniculate ganglion, distance between superior semicircular canal and middle fossa floor, distance between cochlea and middle fossa floor, sigmoid sinus dominance, transverse sigmoid sinus junction depth to the outer cortical bone, jugular bulb height (high or low), location of the vein of Labbé, characteristics of superior petrosal vein complex. The presented checklist provides a systematic scheme of consultation of characteristic of venous and petrous bone anatomy for transpetrosal approaches. In our experience, the use of this checklist reduces the risk of complications related with approach, by minimizing the neglect of crucial information.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Transpetrosal approaches are technically complex and require a complete understanding of surgical and radiological anatomy. A careful evaluation of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scan is mandatory, because anatomical or pathological variations are common and may increase the risk of complications related with the approach.
METHODS
Pre-operative characteristics of venous and petrous bone anatomy were analysed and correlated with intraoperative findings, using injected magnetic resonance imaging and thin-slices computed tomography scan. These data regularly checked before each transpetrosal approach were progressively included in the presented checklist.
RESULTS
Transpetrosal approaches have been used in 101 patients. Items included in the checklist were petrous bone pneumatization, angle between petrous apex and clivus, dehiscence of petrous carotid artery, dehiscence of geniculate ganglion, distance between superior semicircular canal and middle fossa floor, distance between cochlea and middle fossa floor, sigmoid sinus dominance, transverse sigmoid sinus junction depth to the outer cortical bone, jugular bulb height (high or low), location of the vein of Labbé, characteristics of superior petrosal vein complex.
CONCLUSION
The presented checklist provides a systematic scheme of consultation of characteristic of venous and petrous bone anatomy for transpetrosal approaches. In our experience, the use of this checklist reduces the risk of complications related with approach, by minimizing the neglect of crucial information.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35752738
doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05278-8
pii: 10.1007/s00701-022-05278-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2819-2832

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Abbott TEF, Ahmad T, Phull MK et al (2018) The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 120:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.002
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.002 pubmed: 29397122
Abdel Aziz KM, Sanan A, Van Loveren HR et al (2000) Petroclival meningiomas: predictive parameters for transpetrosal approaches. Neurosurgery 47:139–152. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200007000-00030
doi: 10.1097/00006123-200007000-00030 pubmed: 10917357
al-Mefty O, Ayoubi S, Smith RR, (1991) The petrosal approach: indications, technique, and results. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 53:166–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9183-5_27
doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9183-5_27
Al-Mefty O, Fox JL, Smith RR (1988) Petrosal approach for petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 22:510–517
doi: 10.1227/00006123-198803000-00010 pubmed: 3362317
Braham DL, Richardson AL, Malik IS (2014) Application of the WHO surgical safety checklist outside the operating theatre: medicine can learn from surgery. Clin Med J R Coll Physicians London 14:468–474. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-468
doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-468
Bulsara KR, Leveque JC, Gray L et al (2006) Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of the relationship between the arcuate eminence and the superior semicircular canal. Neurosurgery 59:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000219929.13839.B8
doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000219929.13839.B8
Cantore G, Delfini R, Ciappetta P (1994) Surgical treatment of petroclival meningiomas: experience with 16 cases. Surg Neurol 42:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(94)90368-9
doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(94)90368-9 pubmed: 8091285
Champier S, Ballard BJF, Pijoan M (1859) etude biographique. 182–188
Couldwell WT, Fukushima T (1993) Cosmetic mastoidectomy for the combined supra/infratentorial transtemporal approach. Technical note J Neurosurg 79:460–461. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.79.3.0460
doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.79.3.0460 pubmed: 8360748
Dolenc VV (1994) Frontotemporal epidural approach to trigeminal neurinomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 130:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405503
doi: 10.1007/BF01405503
Fudickar A, Hörle K, Wiltfang J, Bein B (2012) “Surgical safety checklist” der Weltgesundheitsorganisation: Auswirkungen auf komplikationsrate und interdisziplinäre kommunikation. Dtsch Arztebl 109:695–701. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2012.0695
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0695
Grossi PM, Nonaka Y, Watanabe K, Fukushima T (2012) The history of the combined supra-and infratentorial approach to the petroclival region. Neurosurg Focus 33:1–5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12141
doi: 10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12141
Hakuba A, Nishimura S (1981) Total removal of clivus meningiomas and the operative results. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 21:59–73. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.21.59
doi: 10.2176/nmc.21.59
Hanakita S, Froelich & KW& P-OC & S, (2016) How I do it: the combined petrosectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 158:711–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2740-5
doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2740-5
Harsh GR IV, Sekhar LN (1992) The subtemporal, transcavernous, anterior transpetrosal approach to the upper brain stem and clivus. J Neurosurg 77:709–717. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.77.5.0709
doi: 10.3171/jns.1992.77.5.0709 pubmed: 1403112
Helmiö P, Takala A, Aaltonen LM, Blomgren K (2012) WHO surgical safety checklist in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery: specialty-related aspects of check items. Acta Otolaryngol 132:1334–1341. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2012.700121
doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.700121 pubmed: 23039247
Hoeffner GE MS (2008) Temporal bone imaging
Howard D, Elster D, May S Part I. Normal. 421–425
Kawase, (2015) Anterior transpetrosal-transtentorial approach for sphenopetroclival meningiomas: surgical method and results in 10 patients. Nhk技研 151:10–17
Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T (1985) Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg 63:857–861. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.63.6.0857
doi: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.6.0857 pubmed: 4056899
Kawase T, Shiobara R, Toya S (1994) Middle fossa transpetrosal-transtentorial approaches for petroclival meningiomas selective pyramid resection and radicality. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 129:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01406489
doi: 10.1007/BF01406489
Kim L, Chen T, Rong Y (2017) A standardized checklist is optimal for patients’ chart check. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12030
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12030 pubmed: 28291916 pmcid: 5689881
Konfirst C, Preston S, Yeh T (2015) Checklists and safety in pediatric cardiac surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 18:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.pcsu.2015.01.006
doi: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2015.01.006 pubmed: 25939842
Kusumi M, Fukushima T, Mehta AI et al (2012) Tentorial detachment technique in the combined petrosal approach for petroclival meningiomas: clinical article. J Neurosurg 116:566–573. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.JNS11985
doi: 10.3171/2011.11.JNS11985 pubmed: 22196100
Millat B (2012) The check list: a useful tool for the entire operation room team. J Visc Surg 149:369–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.10.013
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.10.013 pubmed: 23182849
Morisako H, Goto T, Ohata K (2015) Petroclival meningiomas resected via a combined transpetrosal approach: surgical outcomes in 60 cases and a new scoring system for clinical evaluation. J Neurosurg 122:373–380. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.8.JNS132406
doi: 10.3171/2014.8.JNS132406 pubmed: 25380114
NC Bambakidis UK Kakarla LJ Kim et al 2008 Evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclivalmeningiomas a retrospective review Neurosurgery 62 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000280119.36270.BA
Patel J, Ahmed K, Guru KA et al (2014) An overview of the use and implementation of checklists in surgical specialities—a systematic review. Int J Surg 12:1317–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.031
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.031 pubmed: 25448652
Rateau F, Levraut L, Colombel AL et al (2011) Check-list « Sécurité du patient au bloc opératoire »: une année d’expérience sur 40 000 interventions au centre hospitalier universitaire de Nice. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 30:479–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annfar.2011.04.003
doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2011.04.003 pubmed: 21601412
Samii M, Ammirati M (1988) The combined supra-infratentorial pre-sigmoid sinus avenue to the petro-clival region. Surgical technique and clinical applications. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 95:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01793075
doi: 10.1007/BF01793075
Samii M, Gerganov V, Giordano M, Samii A (2011) Two step approach for surgical removal of petroclival meningiomas with large supratentorial extension. Neurosurg Rev 34:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-010-0299-9
doi: 10.1007/s10143-010-0299-9
Sekhar LN, Wright DC, Richardson R, Monacci W (1996) Petroclival and foramen magnum meningiomas: surgical approaches and pitfalls. J Neurooncol 29:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165655
doi: 10.1007/BF00165655 pubmed: 8858531
Sennaroglu L, Slattery WH (2003) Petrous anatomy for middle fossa approach. Laryngoscope 113:332–342. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200302000-00025
doi: 10.1097/00005537-200302000-00025 pubmed: 12567092
Seo Y, Ito T, Sasaki T et al (2007) Assessment of the anatomical relationship between the arcuate eminence and superior semicircular canal by computed tomography. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 47:335–339. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.47.335
doi: 10.2176/nmc.47.335
Sommer DD, Arbab-Tafti S, Farrokhyar F et al (2018) A challenge-response endoscopic sinus surgery specific checklist as an add-on to standard surgical checklist: an evaluation of potential safety and quality improvement issues. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 8:831–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22106
doi: 10.1002/alr.22106 pubmed: 29485750
Spiessberger A, Baumann F, Kothbauer KF et al (2018) Bony dehiscence of the horizontal petrous internal carotid artery canal: an anatomic study with surgical implications. World Neurosurg 114:e1174–e1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.172
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.172 pubmed: 29614354
Suzuki Y, Matsumoto K (2000) Variations of the superficial middle cerebral vein: classification using three-dimensional CT angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 21:932–938
pubmed: 10815671 pmcid: 7976758
Takkavatakarn K, Puapatanakul P, Kanjanabuch T et al (2020) An early experience of check list to improve patient self-care and product defect report in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CLIP-SP) study. Int J Artif Organs 43:137–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0391398819876943
doi: 10.1177/0391398819876943 pubmed: 31560241
Tatagiba M, Rigante L, Mesquita Filho P et al (2015) Endoscopic-assisted posterior intradural petrous apicectomy in petroclival meningiomas: a clinical series and assessment of perioperative morbidity. World Neurosurg 84:1708–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.033
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.033 pubmed: 26210709
Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY (2014) Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qual Saf 23:299–318. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001797
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001797 pubmed: 23922403
Tuleasca C, Zeverino M, Patin D et al (2019) Lausanne checklist for safe stereotactic radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 161:721–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03843-2
doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03843-2
Voormolen EH, Diederen S, Cebula H et al (2020) Distance control and virtual drilling improves anatomical orientation during anterior petrosectomy. Oper Neurosurg 18:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz064
doi: 10.1093/ons/opz064
World Health Organization (2009) WHO guidelines for safe surgery 2009—safe surgery saves lives. WHO/IER/PSP/2008.08–1E. Second Glob Patient Saf Chall 133
Yamakami I, Uchino Y, Kobayashi E, Yamaura A (2003) Computed tomography evaluation of air cells in the petrous bone: relationship with postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 43:334–338. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.43.334
doi: 10.2176/nmc.43.334

Auteurs

Paolo di Russo (P)

Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France. p.dirusso.nch@gmail.com.
Department of Neurosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. p.dirusso.nch@gmail.com.

Lorenzo Giammattei (L)

Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France.

Thibault Passeri (T)

Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France.

Arianna Fava (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France.
Department of Neurosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.

Eduard Voormolen (E)

Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France.

Anne Laure Bernat (AL)

Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France.

Jean Pierre Guichard (JP)

Department of Neuroradiology, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France.

Kentaro Watanabe (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France.

Sebastien Froelich (S)

Department of Neurosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH