Were anxiety, depression and psychological distress associated with local mortality rates during COVID-19 outbreak in Italy? Findings from the COMET study.
Anxiety
COVID-19
Depression
Mortality rate
Psychological distress
Journal
Journal of psychiatric research
ISSN: 1879-1379
Titre abrégé: J Psychiatr Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376331
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
18
03
2022
revised:
07
06
2022
accepted:
10
06
2022
pubmed:
27
6
2022
medline:
27
7
2022
entrez:
26
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The mental health of the Italian population declined at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, nationwide population prevalence estimates may not effectively reproduce the heterogeneity in distress responses to the pandemic. In particular, contextual determinants specific to COVID-19 pandemic need to be considered. We thus aimed to explore the association between local COVID-19 mortality rates and mental health response among the general population. We capitalised on data (N = 17,628) from a large, cross-sectional, national survey, the COMET study, run between March and May 2020. While psychological distress was measured by General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) was used to assess relevant domains. In addition, a Covid-19 mortality ratio was built to compare single regional mortality rates to the national estimate and official statistics were used to control for other area-level determinants. Adjusted ordered regression analyses showed an association between mortality ratio and moderate (OR = 1.10, 95%CI 1.03-1.18) and severe (OR = 1.11, 95%CI 1.03-1.21) DASS-21 anxiety levels. No effects of mortality ratio on GHQ-12 scores and DASS-21 depression and stress levels, uniformly high across the country, were estimated. Although we could not find any association between regional COVID-19 mortality ratio and depression or psychological distress, anxiety levels were significantly increased among subjects from areas with the highest mortality rates. Local mortality rate seems a meaningful driver for anxiety among the general population. Considering the potentially long-lasting scenario, local public health authorities should provide neighbouring communities with preventive interventions reducing psychological isolation and anxiety levels.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The mental health of the Italian population declined at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, nationwide population prevalence estimates may not effectively reproduce the heterogeneity in distress responses to the pandemic. In particular, contextual determinants specific to COVID-19 pandemic need to be considered. We thus aimed to explore the association between local COVID-19 mortality rates and mental health response among the general population.
METHODS
We capitalised on data (N = 17,628) from a large, cross-sectional, national survey, the COMET study, run between March and May 2020. While psychological distress was measured by General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) was used to assess relevant domains. In addition, a Covid-19 mortality ratio was built to compare single regional mortality rates to the national estimate and official statistics were used to control for other area-level determinants.
RESULTS
Adjusted ordered regression analyses showed an association between mortality ratio and moderate (OR = 1.10, 95%CI 1.03-1.18) and severe (OR = 1.11, 95%CI 1.03-1.21) DASS-21 anxiety levels. No effects of mortality ratio on GHQ-12 scores and DASS-21 depression and stress levels, uniformly high across the country, were estimated.
CONCLUSIONS
Although we could not find any association between regional COVID-19 mortality ratio and depression or psychological distress, anxiety levels were significantly increased among subjects from areas with the highest mortality rates. Local mortality rate seems a meaningful driver for anxiety among the general population. Considering the potentially long-lasting scenario, local public health authorities should provide neighbouring communities with preventive interventions reducing psychological isolation and anxiety levels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35753244
pii: S0022-3956(22)00323-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.018
pmc: PMC9212315
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
242-249Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 03;64(1):e17
pubmed: 33531097
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2021 Apr 16;17:19-25
pubmed: 34040650
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;49(11):1739-46
pubmed: 24562318
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:912-922
pubmed: 34655656
World Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;20(1):140-141
pubmed: 33432755
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 17;11(9):
pubmed: 34573251
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(1):7-16
pubmed: 19854552
Psychol Trauma. 2020 May;12(4):331-335
pubmed: 32271070
Psychol Med. 2021 Apr 20;:1-9
pubmed: 33875044
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 5;11(1):5304
pubmed: 33674627
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 28;63(1):e87
pubmed: 32981568
Future Gener Comput Syst. 2021 Dec;125:446-459
pubmed: 34934256
JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2555-2557
pubmed: 33226420
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Dec;243:112638
pubmed: 31665657
World Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;19(2):250-251
pubmed: 32394579
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;217(4):537-539
pubmed: 32423523
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244630
pubmed: 33370404
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):
pubmed: 33925743
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):266-268
pubmed: 32931119
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec;144:389-396
pubmed: 34735842
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Jan;28(1):5-17
pubmed: 20734364
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 07;18(8):
pubmed: 33917067
World Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;19(2):129-130
pubmed: 32394569
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;8(7):610-619
pubmed: 33965057
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 15;309:1-8
pubmed: 35472470
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 01;63(1):e32
pubmed: 32234102
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):269-293
pubmed: 32931110
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10173
pubmed: 33986414
Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):191-7
pubmed: 9122299
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:169-83
pubmed: 24159920
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:59-66
pubmed: 34592657
J Affect Disord. 2012 Nov;140(3):205-14
pubmed: 22244375
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2008 Oct-Dec;17(4):358-68
pubmed: 19024723
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 26;64(1):e32
pubmed: 33971992
World Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;19(2):130-131
pubmed: 32394549
World Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;20(1):124-130
pubmed: 33026219
Lancet. 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1700-1712
pubmed: 34634250
World Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;19(2):249-250
pubmed: 32394560
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):399-400
pubmed: 32931118
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Sep;142(3):249-256
pubmed: 32716520
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):294-306
pubmed: 32931107
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 31;10(1):22457
pubmed: 33384427
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 May 20;63(1):e45
pubmed: 32431255
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):406-407
pubmed: 32931089
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 05;11:533
pubmed: 32581895
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;7(7):567-568
pubmed: 32502467
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2021 Jul 12;17:52-60
pubmed: 34497660
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892
pubmed: 32707037