CSF TNF and osteopontin levels correlate with the response to dimethyl fumarate in early multiple sclerosis.
TNF
chemokines
cytokines
dimethyl fumarate
disease activity
osteopontin
relapsing multiple sclerosis
Journal
Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders
ISSN: 1756-2856
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Neurol Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101480242
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
31
12
2021
accepted:
18
03
2022
entrez:
27
6
2022
pubmed:
28
6
2022
medline:
28
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Disease activity in the first years after a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is a negative prognostic factor for long-term disability. Markers of both clinical and radiological responses to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are advocated. The objective of this study is to estimate the value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) inflammatory markers at the time of diagnosis in predicting the disease activity in treatment-naïve multiple sclerosis (MS) patients exposed to dimethyl fumarate (DMF). In total, 48 RRMS patients (31 females/17 males) treated with DMF after the diagnosis were included in this 2-year longitudinal study. All patients underwent a CSF examination, regular clinical and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that included the assessment of white matter (WM) lesions, cortical lesions (CLs) and global cortical thickness. CSF levels of 10 pro-inflammatory markers - CXCL13 [chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 or B lymphocyte chemoattractant], CXCL12 (stromal cell-derived factor or C-X-C motif chemokine 12), tumour necrosis factor (TNF), APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand, or tumour necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13), LIGHT (tumour necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 14 or tumour necrosis factor superfamily member 14), interferon (IFN) gamma, interleukin 12 (IL-12), osteopontin, sCD163 [soluble-CD163 (cluster of differentiation 163)] and Chitinase3-like1 - were assessed using immune-assay multiplex techniques. The combined three-domain status of 'no evidence of disease activity' (NEDA-3) was defined by no relapses, no disability worsening and no MRI activity, including CLs. Twenty patients (42%) reached the NEDA-3 status; patients with disease activity showed higher CSF TNF ( CSF inflammatory markers may provide prognostic information in predicting disease activity in the first years after DMF initiation. CSF TNF levels are a possible candidate in predicting treatment response, in addition to clinical, demographic and MRI variables.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Disease activity in the first years after a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is a negative prognostic factor for long-term disability. Markers of both clinical and radiological responses to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are advocated.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
The objective of this study is to estimate the value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) inflammatory markers at the time of diagnosis in predicting the disease activity in treatment-naïve multiple sclerosis (MS) patients exposed to dimethyl fumarate (DMF).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In total, 48 RRMS patients (31 females/17 males) treated with DMF after the diagnosis were included in this 2-year longitudinal study. All patients underwent a CSF examination, regular clinical and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that included the assessment of white matter (WM) lesions, cortical lesions (CLs) and global cortical thickness. CSF levels of 10 pro-inflammatory markers - CXCL13 [chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 or B lymphocyte chemoattractant], CXCL12 (stromal cell-derived factor or C-X-C motif chemokine 12), tumour necrosis factor (TNF), APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand, or tumour necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13), LIGHT (tumour necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 14 or tumour necrosis factor superfamily member 14), interferon (IFN) gamma, interleukin 12 (IL-12), osteopontin, sCD163 [soluble-CD163 (cluster of differentiation 163)] and Chitinase3-like1 - were assessed using immune-assay multiplex techniques. The combined three-domain status of 'no evidence of disease activity' (NEDA-3) was defined by no relapses, no disability worsening and no MRI activity, including CLs.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Twenty patients (42%) reached the NEDA-3 status; patients with disease activity showed higher CSF TNF (
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
CSF inflammatory markers may provide prognostic information in predicting disease activity in the first years after DMF initiation. CSF TNF levels are a possible candidate in predicting treatment response, in addition to clinical, demographic and MRI variables.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35755969
doi: 10.1177/17562864221092124
pii: 10.1177_17562864221092124
pmc: PMC9218430
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
17562864221092124Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: DM received honoraria for research or speaking and funds for travel from Biogen Idec, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Novartis. AIP, GMS, VM, MCas, AT, FB, FC, SM, FBP and GKR: no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. MC received honoraria for research or speaking and funds for travel from Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Biogen Idec, Teva and Novartis.
Références
Neurology. 2018 Jul 10;91(2):e153-e161
pubmed: 29875218
Front Cell Neurosci. 2020 Jul 07;14:190
pubmed: 32733206
Lancet. 2018 Apr 21;391(10130):1622-1636
pubmed: 29576504
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
pubmed: 6685237
Mult Scler. 2014 Mar;20(3):304-12
pubmed: 23886826
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021 Aug 9;8(6):
pubmed: 34373345
Brain. 2012 Oct;135(Pt 10):2952-61
pubmed: 23065788
Cell Immunol. 2000 Oct 10;205(1):24-33
pubmed: 11078604
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Dec;11(12):1082-92
pubmed: 23153407
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Feb;72(2):152-8
pubmed: 25531931
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1098-107
pubmed: 22992073
Ann Neurol. 1983 Mar;13(3):227-31
pubmed: 6847134
JAMA Neurol. 2019 May 1;76(5):536-541
pubmed: 30776055
J Neuroinflammation. 2019 Dec 7;16(1):259
pubmed: 31810488
Cells. 2020 Oct 14;9(10):
pubmed: 33066433
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 May;15(5):287-300
pubmed: 30940920
Neurology. 2009 Dec 1;73(22):1914-22
pubmed: 19949037
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173
pubmed: 29275977
Nat Immunol. 2007 Jan;8(1):74-83
pubmed: 17143274
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021 Sep 8;8(6):
pubmed: 34497102
Neurology. 2018 Jun 12;90(24):e2107-e2118
pubmed: 29769373
Cells. 2021 Jul 06;10(7):
pubmed: 34359880
Science. 2001 Nov 23;294(5547):1731-5
pubmed: 11721059
Neurology. 2014 Jul 15;83(3):278-86
pubmed: 24871874
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Aug;20(8):653-670
pubmed: 34139157
Ann Neurol. 2020 Sep;88(3):562-573
pubmed: 32418239
Neurology. 2019 Mar 5;92(10):e1007-e1015
pubmed: 30737333
Eur J Neurol. 2017 May;24(5):726-733
pubmed: 28328179
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017 May;27(2):301-312
pubmed: 28391788
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020 May 12;8(1):66
pubmed: 32398070
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Apr;19(4):336-347
pubmed: 32059809
Ann Neurol. 2018 Apr;83(4):739-755
pubmed: 29518260
J Neuroimmunol. 2015 Jun 15;283:64-9
pubmed: 26004159
Acta Neuropathol. 2021 Apr;141(4):585-604
pubmed: 33569629
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021 Sep 29;8(6):
pubmed: 34588298
Mult Scler. 2017 Aug;23(9):1179-1187
pubmed: 28381105
Brain. 2011 Mar;134(Pt 3):678-92
pubmed: 21354971
Mult Scler. 2016 Sep;22(10):1297-305
pubmed: 26585439
Neurology. 2013 Nov 12;81(20):1759-67
pubmed: 24122185
Brain. 2020 Oct 1;143(10):3013-3024
pubmed: 32935843
Brain. 2021 Jun 22;144(5):1384-1395
pubmed: 33880511
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1474-1483
pubmed: 31403674
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573