Effects of implant surface mechanical instrumentation methods on peri-implantitis: An
Debridement
Decontamination
Implant
Peri-implantitis
Journal
Journal of dental sciences
ISSN: 2213-8862
Titre abrégé: J Dent Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101293181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
31
07
2021
revised:
20
08
2021
entrez:
27
6
2022
pubmed:
28
6
2022
medline:
28
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although several mechanical and chemical debridement techniques have been reported for the management of peri-implantitis, there is no consensus on the most effective method at present. This From a total of 15 implants, five each were assigned to one of three decontamination groups (Rotary titanium brush [Ti], tricalcium phosphate air powder abrasive treatment [Air], and titanium ultrasonic scaler [US] groups); the exposed hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated portion was divided into three 1-mm sections (coronal, middle, and apical). The residual-HA of each portion was measured using a digital microscope. The overall percentage of residual HA coating was significantly lower in the US group than in the Ti or Air groups ( Ti and US were more effective for shallow defects, whereas US was more effective for deeper defects.
Sections du résumé
Background/purpose
UNASSIGNED
Although several mechanical and chemical debridement techniques have been reported for the management of peri-implantitis, there is no consensus on the most effective method at present. This
Materials and methods
UNASSIGNED
From a total of 15 implants, five each were assigned to one of three decontamination groups (Rotary titanium brush [Ti], tricalcium phosphate air powder abrasive treatment [Air], and titanium ultrasonic scaler [US] groups); the exposed hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated portion was divided into three 1-mm sections (coronal, middle, and apical). The residual-HA of each portion was measured using a digital microscope.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The overall percentage of residual HA coating was significantly lower in the US group than in the Ti or Air groups (
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Ti and US were more effective for shallow defects, whereas US was more effective for deeper defects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35756780
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.08.018
pii: S1991-7902(21)00209-9
pmc: PMC9201532
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
891-896Informations de copyright
© 2021 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.
Références
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jun;30(6):550-558
pubmed: 31009116
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2018 Feb 15;4(1):25-34
pubmed: 29744212
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 18;13(12):
pubmed: 32570785
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Feb;22(1):96-104
pubmed: 31837107
Periodontol 2000. 2018 Feb;76(1):180-190
pubmed: 29239086
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Apr 22;6(1):18
pubmed: 32318868
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):137
pubmed: 29183313
Implant Dent. 2016 Jun;25(3):416-26
pubmed: 27213530
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Mar 25;6(1):12
pubmed: 32211972
Implant Dent. 2019 Apr;28(2):155-160
pubmed: 30913111
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jun;30(6):578-587
pubmed: 31022305
Implant Dent. 2019 Apr;28(2):177-186
pubmed: 30475243
Implant Dent. 2019 Apr;28(2):187-209
pubmed: 30648979
J Periodontol. 2016 Aug;87(8):953-61
pubmed: 26966876
Implant Dent. 2018 Feb;27(1):101-110
pubmed: 29329120
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):1370-1378
pubmed: 31711078
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):635-643
pubmed: 31087457
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Feb;28(2):151-155
pubmed: 26799360
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Aug;28(8):1013-1021
pubmed: 27392811
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291
pubmed: 29926491
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2017 Aug 02;3(4):148-153
pubmed: 29744193
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jul;26(7):841-50
pubmed: 24641774
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Apr;18(2):161-70
pubmed: 17348880
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul;25(7):838-42
pubmed: 23551490
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):292-304
pubmed: 18724857
J Periodontal Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):657-681
pubmed: 29882313
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:216-27
pubmed: 19663967
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29(10):1025-1037
pubmed: 30267445
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):314-9
pubmed: 24373056
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jun;24(6):666-70
pubmed: 22409152
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1238-46
pubmed: 22882522