Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation Improves Function Independent of Comorbidities in Medically Complex Patients.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Comorbidity Rehabilitation

Journal

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation
ISSN: 2590-1095
Titre abrégé: Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763542

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
entrez: 27 6 2022
pubmed: 28 6 2022
medline: 28 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

(1) To evaluate the benefits of acute inpatient rehabilitation for a medically complex patient population and (2) to assess the effect of comorbid conditions on rehabilitation outcomes. Retrospective cohort study. Freestanding inpatient rehabilitation facility. A total of 270 medically complex adult patients including those with cardiac, pulmonary, and orthopedic conditions, with mean age of 73.6 years; 52.6% were female and 47.4% were male (N=270). Not applicable. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain, FIM efficiency, rehabilitation length of stay (RLOS), home discharge rate, and readmission to acute care (RTAC). Among 270 medically complex patients, mean total FIM gain, mean RLOS, and mean FIM efficiency with SD were 26.0±13.6 points, 12.6±5.9 days, and 2.3±1.6, respectively. A total of 71.9% of patients were discharged to home, 12.2% for RTAC, and 15.9% to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Hypertension (HTN) was the only comorbidity significantly associated with FIM gain (53.7% [total FIM gain ≥27] vs 67.2% [total FIM gain <27]; Among 270 medically complex patients, 71.9% were discharged to home, 15.9% to an SNF, and 12.2% for RTAC with a mean RLOS 12.6 days, mean total FIM gain of 26 points, and mean FIM efficiency of 2.3, which were all better than those of all admissions at our facility in 2018. Furthermore, RLOS, total FIM gain and FIM efficiency in this study were all better than their corresponding eRehabData weighted national benchmarks (RLOS, 15.82 days; FIM gain, 25.57; FIM efficiency, 2.13) for a total of 202,520 discharges in 2018. These findings support acute inpatient rehabilitation for this patient population. With the exception of HTN, no medical comorbidities or demographic variables were associated with rehabilitation outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35756989
doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100178
pii: S2590-1095(22)00001-5
pmc: PMC9214302
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100178

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors.

Références

Oncologist. 2017 Oct;22(10):1154-e105
pubmed: 28652279
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Oct 1;17(10):921-6
pubmed: 27424092
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jul;89(7):1284-9
pubmed: 18586130
J Rehabil Med. 2008 Nov;40(10):831-5
pubmed: 19242620
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;83(5):344-52
pubmed: 15100623
PM R. 2018 Jun;10(6):567-572
pubmed: 29141183
Eur J Neurol. 2003 May;10(3):235-8
pubmed: 12752396
BMC Neurol. 2012 Mar 24;12:16
pubmed: 22443681
PM R. 2017 Sep;9(9S2):S324-S334
pubmed: 28942907
J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 Jul;41(4):444-449
pubmed: 29355465
PM R. 2013 Feb;5(2):114-21
pubmed: 22981003
Mov Disord. 2015 Jul;30(8):1050-8
pubmed: 26095443
Eura Medicophys. 2006 Jun;42(2):91-6
pubmed: 16767056
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;97(12):879-884
pubmed: 29952780
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0142180
pubmed: 26599009
PM R. 2019 Dec;11(12):1335-1345
pubmed: 31041836
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019 Nov;39(6):E19-E25
pubmed: 31343586
Stroke. 2004 Aug;35(8):1941-5
pubmed: 15232123
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Dec;22(12):2461-2467
pubmed: 33984292
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jul;90(7):1202-7
pubmed: 19577034
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jul;97(7):514-522
pubmed: 29465443
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Sep;97(9):1473-1480
pubmed: 27178094
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Aug;53(4):493-500
pubmed: 28084061
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):2976-80
pubmed: 26337968
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Feb;78(2):166-72
pubmed: 9041898
PM R. 2022 Feb;14(2):190-197
pubmed: 33528114
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2019 Jun-Jul;12(4):188-197
pubmed: 31428236
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 May;97(5):772-80
pubmed: 26836952
Rehabil Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):22-5
pubmed: 16422041
Med Care. 2015 Sep;53(9):e65-72
pubmed: 23703645
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Nov;81(11):830-7
pubmed: 12394994
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Jan;42(1):20-31
pubmed: 29596035
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S293-303.e1
pubmed: 26212405
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;293:125-130
pubmed: 31279661
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Mar;100(3):481-487.e2
pubmed: 30786977
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1688-95
pubmed: 25956826
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 May;26(8):808-817
pubmed: 30813817
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr;94(4 Suppl):S98-105
pubmed: 23527777
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;75(2):127-32
pubmed: 8311667
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;92(8):686-96
pubmed: 23370578
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr;94(4 Suppl):S75-86
pubmed: 23527775

Auteurs

Shangming Zhang (S)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Dan Lin (D)

Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Megan E Wright (ME)

Department of Neurology, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

Nicole Swallow (N)

Department of Internal Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States.

Classifications MeSH