Algorithmic discrimination causes less moral outrage than human discrimination.


Journal

Journal of experimental psychology. General
ISSN: 1939-2222
Titre abrégé: J Exp Psychol Gen
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7502587

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 28 6 2022
medline: 7 2 2023
entrez: 27 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Companies and governments are using algorithms to improve decision-making for hiring, medical treatments, and parole. The use of algorithms holds promise for overcoming human biases in decision-making, but they frequently make decisions that discriminate. Media coverage suggests that people are morally outraged by algorithmic discrimination, but here we examine whether people are

Identifiants

pubmed: 35758989
pii: 2022-73886-001
doi: 10.1037/xge0001250
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4-27

Subventions

Organisme : National Science Foundation
Organisme : Charles Koch Foundation

Auteurs

Yochanan E Bigman (YE)

Department of Psychology, Yale University.

Desman Wilson (D)

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.

Mads N Arnestad (MN)

Department of Leadership and Organizational Behaviour, BI Norwegian Business School.

Adam Waytz (A)

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.

Kurt Gray (K)

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH