Feasibility of 16S rRNA sequencing for cerebrospinal fluid microbiome analysis in cattle with neurological disorders: a pilot study.


Journal

Veterinary research communications
ISSN: 1573-7446
Titre abrégé: Vet Res Commun
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8100520

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 30 12 2021
accepted: 31 05 2022
medline: 26 5 2023
pubmed: 28 6 2022
entrez: 27 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bacterial infection of the central nervous system (CNS) in cattle requires prompt and adequate antimicrobial treatment. The current gold standard for antemortem etiological diagnosis is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture, which often yields false negative results. CSF has long been considered a sterile district in healthy patients, but this notion has been recently challenged. For this pilot study, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to investigate the microbial composition of CSF of cattle presenting with CNS disorders and to compare it between subjects with CNS infections and with CNS disorders of other nature. The study sample was 10 animals: 4 presenting with CNS infectious-inflammatory diseases and 6 with other CNS disorders, based on definitive diagnosis. Since the initial round of a standard 16S rRNA PCR did not yield sufficient genetic material for sequencing in any of the samples, the protocol was modified to increase its sensitivity. Bacterial genetic material was identified in 6 animals and 2 groups were formed: an infectious inflammatory (n = 3) and a noninfectious inflammatory group (n = 3). The most frequently expressed bacterial families were Pseudomonadaceae (44.61%), Moraxellaceae (19.54%), Mycobacteriaceae (11.80%); the genera were Pseudomonas (45.42%), Acinetobacter (19.91%), Mycobacterium (12.01%). There were no detectable differences in the CSF microbial composition of the samples from the two groups. Sequencing of bacterial DNA present in the CSF was possible only after increasing PCR sensitivity. The results of 16S rRNA sequencing showed the presence of a microbial community in the CSF in cattle with neurological disorders. Further studies, in which CSF samples from healthy animals and samples from the environment are included as controls, are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35759164
doi: 10.1007/s11259-022-09949-w
pii: 10.1007/s11259-022-09949-w
pmc: PMC10209220
doi:

Substances chimiques

RNA, Ribosomal, 16S 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

373-383

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Vet Clin Pathol. 2009 Mar;38(1):103-12
pubmed: 19228366
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2004 Jul;20(2):215-30, v
pubmed: 15203223
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Oct 14;10(10):
pubmed: 33066371
Infection. 2000 Nov-Dec;28(6):395-7
pubmed: 11139162
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Mar;14(3):133-150
pubmed: 29377008
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 6;10(1):5029
pubmed: 31695033
Int J Med Microbiol. 2019 Sep;309(6):151338
pubmed: 31444101
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Sep;54(9):2251-61
pubmed: 27335149
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2019 Jul;31(4):588-593
pubmed: 31179896
Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;146:187-206
pubmed: 29110770
Front Neurosci. 2018 Dec 11;12:930
pubmed: 30618559
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Aug 07;9:4417-29
pubmed: 26300628
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2017 Mar;33(1):1-8
pubmed: 28166933
Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 23;5(1):eaau3333
pubmed: 30746447
Front Microbiol. 2015 Mar 18;6:214
pubmed: 26074881
Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 30;10(9):
pubmed: 32872674
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2007 Nov;60(6):397-9
pubmed: 18032844
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e65226
pubmed: 23734239
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2017 Mar;33(1):9-18
pubmed: 28166937
Front Microbiol. 2019 Sep 06;10:2061
pubmed: 31555247
Nat Rev Neurol. 2020 Oct;16(10):547-556
pubmed: 32661342
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 19;8(1):15529
pubmed: 30341326
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857
pubmed: 31341288
BMC Biol. 2014 Nov 12;12:87
pubmed: 25387460

Auteurs

Sara Ferrini (S)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, Clinical section, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Elena Grego (E)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, Clinical section, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Ugo Ala (U)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, Clinical section, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Giulia Cagnotti (G)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, Clinical section, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy. giulia.cagnotti@unito.it.

Flaminia Valentini (F)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, Clinical section, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Giorgia Di Muro (G)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, Clinical section, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Barbara Iulini (B)

Istituto Zooprofilattico del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Turin, Italy.

Maria Cristina Stella (MC)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, Clinical section, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Claudio Bellino (C)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, Clinical section, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Antonio D'Angelo (A)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, Clinical section, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

Articles similaires

Humans Child Nervous System Diseases Adolescent Polypharmacy
Humans Students, Medical Robotic Surgical Procedures Feasibility Studies Female
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell

Classifications MeSH