Radiographic imaging of carbon fiber implants in the appendicular skeleton in orthopedic oncology.
Carbon Fiber/Polyetheretherketone
Hardware
Malignancy
Neoplasm
Radiographic
Tumor
Journal
Skeletal radiology
ISSN: 1432-2161
Titre abrégé: Skeletal Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7701953
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
20
04
2022
accepted:
20
06
2022
revised:
19
06
2022
pubmed:
28
6
2022
medline:
18
10
2022
entrez:
27
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Carbon fiber/poly-ether-ether-ketone implants are increasingly being used in orthopedic oncology. An understanding of how to evaluate the normal appearance of these implants is critical for detecting any failures or complications that may arise. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide primarily a radiographic review of the normal radiographic appearance of carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone implants in the appendicular skeleton with some cross-sectional imaging discussion. We additionally aim to highlight some of the unique clinical benefits compared to metal implants, review the unique appearance of failures of these implants, and propose a standardized radiologic method for their evaluation. Our review is based on a retrospective case review of 31 patients with carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone implants placed in a single center orthopedic oncology practice from 2017 to 2021.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35761094
doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-04100-x
pii: 10.1007/s00256-022-04100-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzophenones
0
Carbon Fiber
0
Ethers
0
Ketones
0
Polymers
0
Polyethylene Glycols
3WJQ0SDW1A
Carbon
7440-44-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2237-2244Informations de copyright
© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Références
Jiang W, Rixiati Y, Zhao B, Li Y, Tang C, Liu J. Incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of systemic malignancy with bone metastases. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28(2):230949902091598.
doi: 10.1177/2309499020915989
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21590
Skovlund Sørensen M, Hindsø K, Frederik Horstmann P, Troelsen A, Dalsgaard S, Fog T, et al. Incidence of surgical interventions for metastatic bone disease in the extremities: a population-based cohort study. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(4):456–62.
doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1549368
Gutowski CJ, Basu-Mallick A, Abraham JA. Management of Bone Sarcoma. Surg Clin North Am. 2016;96(5):1077–106.
doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2016.06.002
Piccioli A, Piana R, Lisanti M, Di Martino A, Rossi B, Camnasio F, et al. Carbon-fiber reinforced intramedullary nailing in musculoskeletal tumor surgery: a national multicentric experience of the Italian Orthopaedic Society (SIOT) Bone Metastasis Study Group. Injury. 2017;48:S55–9.
doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30659-9
Akay M, Asian N. An estimation of fatigue life for a carbon fibre/poly ether ether ketone hip joint prosthesis. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1995;209(2):93–103.
doi: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_325_02
Jawad MU, Scully SP. In brief: classifications in brief: mirels’ classification: metastatic disease in long bones and impending pathologic fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(10):2825–7.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1326-4
Hak DJ, Mauffrey C, Seligson D, Lindeque B. Use of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite implants in orthopedic surgery. Lindeque BGP, editor. Orthopedics. 2014;37(12):825–30.
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20141124-05
Zimel MN, Hwang S, Riedel ER, Healey JH. Carbon fiber intramedullary nails reduce artifact in postoperative advanced imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44(9):1317–25.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2158-9
Soriani A, Strigari L, Petrongari MG, Anelli V, Baldi J, Salducca N, et al. The advantages of carbon fiber based orthopedic devices in patients who have to undergo radiotherapy. Acta Biomedica Atenei Parmensis. 2020;91(3): e2020057.
Mastella E, Molinelli S, Magro G, Mirandola A, Russo S, Vai A, et al. Dosimetric characterization of carbon fiber stabilization devices for post-operative particle therapy. Physica Med. 2017;44:18–25.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.008
Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4845–69.
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
Delaney FT, Denton H, Dodds M, Kavanagh EC. Multimodal imaging of composite carbon fiber–based implants for orthopedic spinal fixation. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50(5):1039–45.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03622-6
Long JR, Kalani MA, Goulding KA, Ashman JB, Flug JA. Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone orthopedic implants in musculoskeletal and spinal tumors: imaging and clinical features. Skeletal Radiol [Internet]. 2022 May 10 [cited 2022 Jun 5]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04069-7
Hillock R, Howard S. Utility of carbon fiber implants in orthopedic surgery: literature review. Reconstructive Review. 2014;4(1):23–32.
doi: 10.15438/rr.v4i1.55
Mauffrey C, Butler N, Hake ME. Fabrication of an interlocked antibiotic/cement-coated carbon fiber nail for the treatment of long bone osteomyelitis. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(2):S23–4.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000587
Huber FA, Sprengel K, Müller L, Graf LC, Osterhoff G, Guggenberger R. Comparison of different CT metal artifact reduction strategies for standard titanium and carbon-fiber reinforced polymer implants in sheep cadavers. BMC Med Imaging. 2021;21(1):29.
doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00554-y