A core outcome domain set for clinical research on capillary malformations (the COSCAM project): an e-Delphi process and consensus meeting.


Journal

The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
revised: 16 06 2022
received: 14 12 2021
accepted: 26 06 2022
pubmed: 29 6 2022
medline: 5 11 2022
entrez: 28 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is limited evidence on the best available treatment options for capillary malformations (CMs), mainly due to the absence of uniform outcome measures in trials on therapies. A core outcome set (COS) enables standard reporting of trial outcomes, which facilitates comparison of treatment results. To develop a core outcome domain set (CDS), as part of a core outcome set (COS), for clinical research on CMs. Sixty-seven potentially relevant outcome subdomains were recognized based on the literature, focus group sessions, and input from the COSCAM working group. These outcome subdomains were presented in an online Delphi study to CM experts (medical specialists and authors of relevant literature) and (parents of) patients with CM (international patient associations). During three e-Delphi study rounds, the participants repeatedly scored the importance of these outcome subdomains on a seven-point Likert scale. Participants could also propose other relevant outcome subdomains. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement as to the importance of an outcome subdomain among both stakeholder groups. The CDS was finalized during an online consensus meeting. In total 269 participants from 45 countries participated in the first e-Delphi study round. Of these, 106 were CM experts from 32 countries, made up predominantly of dermatologists (59%) and plastic surgeons (18%). Moreover, 163 (parents of) patients with CM from 28 countries participated, of whom 58% had Sturge-Weber syndrome. During the two subsequent e-Delphi study rounds, 189 and 148 participants participated, respectively. After the entire consensus process, consensus was reached on 11 outcome subdomains: colour/redness, thickness, noticeability, distortion of anatomical structures, glaucoma, overall health-related quality of life, emotional functioning, social functioning, tolerability of intervention, patient satisfaction with treatment results, and recurrence. We recommend the CDS to be used as a minimum reporting standard in all future trials of CM therapy. Our next step will be to select suitable outcome measurement instruments to score the core outcome subdomains. What is already known about this topic? Besides physical and functional sequelae, capillary malformations (CMs) often cause emotional and social burden. The lack of uniform outcome measures obstructs proper evaluation and comparison of treatment strategies. As a result, there is limited evidence on the best available treatment options. The development of a core outcome set (COS) may improve standardized reporting of trial outcomes. What does this study add? A core outcome domain set (CDS), as part of a COS, was developed for clinical research on CMs. International consensus was reached on the recommended core outcome subdomains to be measured in CM trials: colour/redness, thickness, noticeability, distortion of anatomical structures, glaucoma, overall health-related quality of life, emotional functioning, social functioning, tolerability of intervention, patient satisfaction with treatment results, and recurrence. This CDS enables the next step in the development of a COS, namely to reach consensus on the core outcome measurement instruments to score the core outcome subdomains. What are the clinical implications of this work? The obtained CDS will facilitate standardized reporting of treatment outcomes, thereby enabling proper comparison of treatment results. This comparison is likely to provide more reliable information for patients about the best available treatment options.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is limited evidence on the best available treatment options for capillary malformations (CMs), mainly due to the absence of uniform outcome measures in trials on therapies. A core outcome set (COS) enables standard reporting of trial outcomes, which facilitates comparison of treatment results.
OBJECTIVES
To develop a core outcome domain set (CDS), as part of a core outcome set (COS), for clinical research on CMs.
METHODS
Sixty-seven potentially relevant outcome subdomains were recognized based on the literature, focus group sessions, and input from the COSCAM working group. These outcome subdomains were presented in an online Delphi study to CM experts (medical specialists and authors of relevant literature) and (parents of) patients with CM (international patient associations). During three e-Delphi study rounds, the participants repeatedly scored the importance of these outcome subdomains on a seven-point Likert scale. Participants could also propose other relevant outcome subdomains. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement as to the importance of an outcome subdomain among both stakeholder groups. The CDS was finalized during an online consensus meeting.
RESULTS
In total 269 participants from 45 countries participated in the first e-Delphi study round. Of these, 106 were CM experts from 32 countries, made up predominantly of dermatologists (59%) and plastic surgeons (18%). Moreover, 163 (parents of) patients with CM from 28 countries participated, of whom 58% had Sturge-Weber syndrome. During the two subsequent e-Delphi study rounds, 189 and 148 participants participated, respectively. After the entire consensus process, consensus was reached on 11 outcome subdomains: colour/redness, thickness, noticeability, distortion of anatomical structures, glaucoma, overall health-related quality of life, emotional functioning, social functioning, tolerability of intervention, patient satisfaction with treatment results, and recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
We recommend the CDS to be used as a minimum reporting standard in all future trials of CM therapy. Our next step will be to select suitable outcome measurement instruments to score the core outcome subdomains. What is already known about this topic? Besides physical and functional sequelae, capillary malformations (CMs) often cause emotional and social burden. The lack of uniform outcome measures obstructs proper evaluation and comparison of treatment strategies. As a result, there is limited evidence on the best available treatment options. The development of a core outcome set (COS) may improve standardized reporting of trial outcomes. What does this study add? A core outcome domain set (CDS), as part of a COS, was developed for clinical research on CMs. International consensus was reached on the recommended core outcome subdomains to be measured in CM trials: colour/redness, thickness, noticeability, distortion of anatomical structures, glaucoma, overall health-related quality of life, emotional functioning, social functioning, tolerability of intervention, patient satisfaction with treatment results, and recurrence. This CDS enables the next step in the development of a COS, namely to reach consensus on the core outcome measurement instruments to score the core outcome subdomains. What are the clinical implications of this work? The obtained CDS will facilitate standardized reporting of treatment outcomes, thereby enabling proper comparison of treatment results. This comparison is likely to provide more reliable information for patients about the best available treatment options.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35762296
doi: 10.1111/bjd.21723
pmc: PMC9796083
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

730-742

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.

Références

J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1991 Jan;17(1):76-9
pubmed: 1991884
Dermatology. 2021;237(3):416-432
pubmed: 33271556
PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002148
pubmed: 27755541
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 22;356(12):1235-40
pubmed: 17377161
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jul;81(1):297-305
pubmed: 30878565
Trials. 2014 Jun 25;15:247
pubmed: 24962012
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Nov;185(5):970-977
pubmed: 33959942
Arch Dermatol Res. 1988;280(6):338-45
pubmed: 3190266
J Invest Dermatol. 2011 Mar;131(3):623-30
pubmed: 20944653
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Jan;49(1):104-109
pubmed: 27320685
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 23;368(21):1971-9
pubmed: 23656586
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2015 May;28(3):363-9
pubmed: 25645179
J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Jan;135(1):24-30
pubmed: 25186228
J Clin Transl Res. 2019 May 01;5(1):1-24
pubmed: 31579838
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Jul;20(7):2203-2210
pubmed: 33949094
Trials. 2012 Aug 06;13:132
pubmed: 22867278
Br J Dermatol. 1989 Aug;121(2):209-15
pubmed: 2775645
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235657
pubmed: 32614899
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Sep;22(5):603-614
pubmed: 34160795
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 16;14(11):e1002447
pubmed: 29145404
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Feb;34(2):267-273
pubmed: 31419337
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Feb;178(2):473-481
pubmed: 28986976
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018 Apr;20(2):77-84
pubmed: 29384394
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):193-6
pubmed: 26503090
Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Mar - Apr;21(2):77-84
pubmed: 28460714
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Feb;35(2):523-535
pubmed: 32779829
Can Med Assoc J. 1974 Nov 2;111(9):953-4
pubmed: 4418401
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Oct;67(4):687-93
pubmed: 22226814
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Sep;35(9):1888-1895
pubmed: 34014582
Int J Dermatol. 1995 Oct;34(10):704-6
pubmed: 8537158
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Apr;76(4):695-702
pubmed: 27955934
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Apr;66(4):634-41
pubmed: 22244840
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Oct;171(4):861-7
pubmed: 24976116
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1997 Jul;22(4):166-8
pubmed: 9499604
J Invest Dermatol. 2020 May;140(5):1106-1110.e2
pubmed: 31726051
Br J Dermatol. 2000 Dec;143(6):1230-4
pubmed: 11122026
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Jul;33(7):1369-1377
pubmed: 30908756
Exp Dermatol. 2016 Jan;25(1):17-9
pubmed: 26268729
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 20;8(4):e021198
pubmed: 29678992
Eur J Dermatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):246-51
pubmed: 22285557

Auteurs

Ginger Beau Langbroek (GB)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Albert Wolkerstorfer (A)

Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health, Immunity and Infections, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Sophie E R Horbach (SER)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Phyllis I Spuls (PI)

Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health, Immunity and Infections, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Kristen M Kelly (KM)

Department of Dermatology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

Susan J Robertson (SJ)

Department of Dermatology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

M Ingmar van Raath (MI)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Firas Al-Niaimi (F)

Private dermatological practice, London, UK.
Department of Dermatology, University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark.

Taro Kono (T)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.

Pablo Boixeda (P)

Department of Dermatology, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

Hans J Laubach (HJ)

Department of Dermatology, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.

Ashraf M Badawi (AM)

Department of Dermatology, Szeged University, Szeged, Hungary.
Department of Medical Laser Applications, National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Agneta Troilius Rubin (AT)

Department of Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Merete Haedersdal (M)

Department of Dermatology, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.

Woraphong Manuskiatti (W)

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Chantal M A M van der Horst (CMAM)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

D T Ubbink (DT)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH