Usefulness, acceptation and feasibility of electronic medical history tool in reflux disease.
Artificial
Future
Gastroesophageal
Head neck
Intelligence
Laryngology
Laryngopharyngeal
Medical history
Otolaryngology
Reflux
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
09
02
2022
accepted:
19
06
2022
pubmed:
29
6
2022
medline:
7
1
2023
entrez:
28
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate usefulness, feasibility, and patient satisfaction of an electronic pre-consultation medical history tool (EPMH) in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) work-up. Seventy-five patients with LPR were invited to complete electronic medical history assessment prior to laryngology consultation. EPMH collected the following parameters: demographic and epidemiological data, medication, medical and surgical histories, diet habits, stress and symptom findings. Stress and symptoms were assessed with perceived stress scale and reflux symptom score. Duration of consultation, acceptance, and satisfaction of patients (feasibility, usefulness, effectiveness, understanding of questions) were evaluated through a 9-item patient-reported outcome questionnaire. Seventy patients completed the evaluation (93% participation rate). The mean age of cohort was 51.2 ± 15.6 years old. There were 35 females and 35 males. Patients who refused to participate (N = 5) were > 65 years old. The consultation duration was significantly lower in patients who used the EPMH (11.3 ± 2.7 min) compared with a control group (18.1 ± 5.1 min; p = 0.001). Ninety percent of patients were satisfied about EPMH easiness and usefulness, while 97.1% thought that EPMH may improve the disease management. Patients would recommend similar approach for otolaryngological or other specialty consultations in 98.6% and 92.8% of cases, respectively. The use of EPMH is associated with adequate usefulness, feasibility, and satisfaction outcomes in patients with LPR. This software is a preliminary step in the development of an AI-based diagnostic decision support tool to help laryngologists in their daily practice. Future randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate the gain of similar approaches on the traditional consultation format.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35763082
doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07520-6
pii: 10.1007/s00405-022-07520-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
259-267Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Lechien JR, Akst LM, Hamdan AL et al (2019) Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: state of the art review. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 160(5):762–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819827488
doi: 10.1177/0194599819827488
Kamani T, Penney S, Mitra I, Pothula V (2012) The prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in the English population. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(10):2219–2225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2028-1
doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2028-1
Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M (2000) Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):385–388
doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.109935
Francis DO, Patel DA, Sharda R, Hovis K, Sathe N, Penson DF, Feurer ID, McPheeters ML, Vaezi MF (2016) Patient-reported outcome measures related to laryngopharyngeal reflux: a systematic review of instrument development and validation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 155(6):923–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816664330
doi: 10.1177/0194599816664330
Lechien JR, Schindler A, De Marrez LG, Hamdan AL, Karkos PD, Harmegnies B, Barillari MR, Finck C, Saussez S (2019) Instruments evaluating the clinical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 129(3):720–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27537
doi: 10.1002/lary.27537
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V, Mouawad F, Dequanter D, Horoi M, Thill MP, Rodriguez Ruiz A, Saussez S (2021) The efficacy of a personalised treatment depending on the characteristics of reflux at multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring in patients with acid, non-acid and mixed laryngopharyngeal reflux. Clin Otolaryngol 46(3):602–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13722
doi: 10.1111/coa.13722
Bowling A, Rowe G, Lambert N, Waddington M, Mahtani KR, Kenten C, Howe A, Francis SA (2012) The measurement of patients’ expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients’ expectations. Health Technol Assess 16(30):i-xii-1–509. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta16300
doi: 10.3310/hta16300
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V, Saussez S, Remacle M, Hans S (2021) Reflux clinic: proof-of-concept of a Multidisciplinary European Clinic. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278(5):1713–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06705-9
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06705-9
Lechien JR, Chan WW, Akst LM, Hoppo T, Jobe BA, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Muls V, Bobin F, Saussez S, Carroll TL, Vaezi MF, Bock JM (2021) Normative ambulatory reflux monitoring metrics for laryngopharyngeal reflux: a systematic review of 720 healthy individuals. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998211029831
doi: 10.1177/01945998211029831
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V, Eisendrath P, Horoi M, Thill MP, Dequanter D, Durdurez JP, Rodriguez A, Saussez S (2020) Gastroesophageal reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: clinical features and therapeutic response. Laryngoscope 130(8):E479–E489. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28482
doi: 10.1002/lary.28482
Bellinghausen L, Collange J, Botella M, Emery JL, Albert E (2009) Factorial validation of the French scale for perceived stress in the workplace. Sante Publique 21(4):365–373
doi: 10.3917/spub.094.0365
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V, Thill MP, Horoi M, Ostermann K, Huet K, Harmegnies B, Dequanter D, Dapri G, Maréchal MT, Finck C, Rodriguez Ruiz A, Saussez S (2020) Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom score. Laryngoscope 130(3):E98–E107. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28017
doi: 10.1002/lary.28017
de Dorlodot C, Horoi M, Lefebvre P, Collet S, Bertrand B, Eloy P, Poirrier AL (2015) French adaptation and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test-22: a prospective cohort study on quality of life among 422 subjects. Clin Otolaryngol 40(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12315
doi: 10.1111/coa.12315
Woisard V, Bodin S, Puech M (2004) The Voice Handicap Index: impact of the translation in French on the validation. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 125(5):307–312
Lechien JR, Cavelier G, Thill MP, Huet K, Harmegnies B, Bousard L, Blecic S, Vanderwegen J, Rodriguez A, Dequanter D (2019) Validity and reliability of the French version of Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(6):1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05429-1
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05429-1
Lechien JR, Rodriguez Ruiz A, Dequanter D, Bobin F, Mouawad F, Muls V, Huet K, Harmegnies B, Remacle S, Finck C, Saussez S (2020) Validity and reliability of the reflux sign assessment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 129(4):313–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419888947
doi: 10.1177/0003489419888947
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V, Saussez S, Hans S (2021) Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease is more severe in obese patients: a prospective multicenter study. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29676
doi: 10.1002/lary.29676
Lechien JR, Carroll TL, Bobin F, Muls V, Rodriguez A, Horoi M, Dequanter D, Crevier-Buchman L, Hans S, Saussez S (2021) Influence of age and sex on clinical and therapeutic features of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998211020284
doi: 10.1177/01945998211020284
Robotti C, Schindler A, Lechien JR, Di Sabatino A, Capobianco S, Ottaviani F, Sims HS, Bertino G, Benazzo M, Mozzanica F (2021) Prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms, dysphonia, and vocal tract discomfort in amateur choir singers. J Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.024
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.024
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Mouawad F, Zelenik K, Calvo-Henriquez C, Chiesa-Estomba CM et al (2019) Development of scores assessing the refluxogenic potential of diet of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(12):3389–3404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05631-1
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05631-1
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V, Horoi M, Thill MP, Dequanter D, Rodriguez A, Saussez S (2020) Patients with acid, high-fat and low-protein diet have higher laryngopharyngeal reflux episodes at the impedance-pH monitoring. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277(2):511–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05711-2
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05711-2
Katzka DA, Kahrilas PJ (2020) Advances in the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal refluxdisease. BMJ 371:m3786. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3786
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3786
Koufman JA (2011) Low-acid diet for recalcitrant laryngopharyngeal reflux: therapeutic benefits and their implications. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120(5):281–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941112000501
doi: 10.1177/000348941112000501
Halum SL, Postma GN, Johnston C, Belafsky PC, Koufman JA (2005) Patients with isolated laryngopharyngeal reflux are not obese. Laryngoscope 115(6):1042–1045. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLG.0000162656.05715.57
doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000162656.05715.57
Andén A, Andersson SO, Rudebeck CE (2005) Satisfaction is not all–patients’ perceptions of outcome of general practice consultations, a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 6:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-6-43
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-43
Jalil A, Zakar R, Zakar MZ, Fischer F (2017) Patient satisfaction with doctor-patient interactions: a mixed methods study among diabetes mellitus patients in Pakistan. BMC Health Serv Res 17(1):155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2094-6
doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2094-6
Alrassi J, Katsufrakis PJ, Chandran L (2021) Technology can augment, but not replace, critical human skills needed for patient care. Acad Med 96(1):37–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003733
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003733
Zhang Z, Citardi D, Wang D, Genc Y, Shan J, Fan X (2021) Patients’ perceptions of using artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology to comprehend radiology imaging data. Health Informatics J 27(2):14604582211011216. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211011215
doi: 10.1177/14604582211011215
Yao P, Usman M, Chen YH, German A, Andreadis K, Mages K, Rameau A (2021) Applications of artificial intelligence to office laryngoscopy: a scoping review. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29886
doi: 10.1002/lary.29886
Sandler RS, Everhart JE, Donowitz M et al (2002) The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 122(5):1500–1511
doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.32978
Francis DO, Rymer JA, Slaughter JC et al (2013) High economic burden of caring for patients with suspected extraesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 108(6):905–911
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.69