Atezolizumab With Neoadjuvant Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Therapy and Chemotherapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Primary Results of the Randomized Phase III IMpassion050 Trial.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
B7-H1 Antigen
/ therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms
/ pathology
Cyclophosphamide
Doxorubicin
Female
Humans
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ adverse effects
Paclitaxel
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ metabolism
Trastuzumab
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2022
01 09 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
29
6
2022
medline:
1
9
2022
entrez:
28
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Combining standard of care (pertuzumab-trastuzumab [PH], chemotherapy) with cancer immunotherapy may potentiate antitumor immunity, cytotoxic activity, and patient outcomes in high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer. We report the phase III IMpassion050 primary analysis of neoadjuvant atezolizumab, PH, and chemotherapy in these patients. Patients with a primary tumor of > 2 cm and histologically confirmed, positive lymph node status (T2-4, N1-3, M0) were randomly assigned 1:1 to atezolizumab/placebo with dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, followed by paclitaxel, and PH. After surgery, patients were to continue atezolizumab/placebo and PH (total: 1 year of HER2-targeted therapy); those with residual disease could switch to ado-trastuzumab emtansine with atezolizumab/placebo. Coprimary efficacy end points were pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0/is ypN0) rates in intention-to-treat (ITT) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive populations. At clinical cutoff (February 5, 2021), pCR rates in the placebo and atezolizumab groups in the ITT populations were 62.7% (n = 143/228) and 62.4% (n = 141/226), respectively (difference -0.33%; 95% CI, -9.2 to 8.6; Atezolizumab with neoadjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel and PH for high-risk, HER2-positive early breast cancer did not increase pCR rates versus placebo in the ITT or PD-L1-positive populations. PH and chemotherapy remains standard of care; longer follow-up may help to inform the long-term impact of atezolizumab.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35763704
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02772
pmc: PMC9426828
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
atezolizumab
52CMI0WC3Y
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03726879']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2946-2956Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Références
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1283-1295
pubmed: 33002436
Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1817-1828
pubmed: 33278935
Cell Rep. 2015 Sep 29;12(12):2049-59
pubmed: 26365188
Cancer Cell. 2007 Oct;12(4):395-402
pubmed: 17936563
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Nov 25;7(315):315ra188
pubmed: 26606967
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):44-59
pubmed: 31786121
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1090-1100
pubmed: 32966830
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 10;32(29):3212-20
pubmed: 25199759
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):563-7
pubmed: 25428504
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):791-800
pubmed: 27179402
Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1194-1220
pubmed: 31161190
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jan 1;111(1):69-77
pubmed: 29788230
Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):497-504
pubmed: 27831502
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar;20(3):371-382
pubmed: 30765258
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1519-25
pubmed: 27177864
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2108-2121
pubmed: 30345906
Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2232-2239
pubmed: 30203045
Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):177-82
pubmed: 3798106
Lancet. 2020 Jun 13;395(10240):1835-1844
pubmed: 32534646
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):519-530
pubmed: 32171426
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 08;16(4):R73
pubmed: 25005255
Int J Breast Cancer. 2021 May 24;2021:6684629
pubmed: 34123431
Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1541-1557
pubmed: 31373601
J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 1;39(13):1485-1505
pubmed: 33507815
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Feb;20(1):19-24
pubmed: 31806448
J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 1;39(13):1448-1457
pubmed: 33539215
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):40-50
pubmed: 29233559
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):617-628
pubmed: 30516102
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):7142-7
pubmed: 21482773
Pathol Res Pract. 2020 Nov;216(11):153155
pubmed: 32871536
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Nov;20(11):651-668
pubmed: 32433532
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 1;22(15):3755-63
pubmed: 26920887
Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1279-1288
pubmed: 31095287
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jul;1(4):448-54
pubmed: 26181252
Ann Oncol. 2021 Aug;32(8):994-1004
pubmed: 34219000
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 15;26(12):2838-2848
pubmed: 32046998
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72
pubmed: 24529560
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 Mar 12;6:10
pubmed: 32195333
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 27;382(9):810-821
pubmed: 32101663