Waveform detection by deep learning reveals multi-area spindles that are selectively modulated by memory load.
computational biology
deep learning
human
memory
memory consolidation
neuroscience
rhesus macaque
sleep spindles
systems biology
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 06 2022
29 06 2022
Historique:
received:
23
11
2021
accepted:
27
05
2022
entrez:
29
6
2022
pubmed:
30
6
2022
medline:
1
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sleep is generally considered to be a state of large-scale synchrony across thalamus and neocortex; however, recent work has challenged this idea by reporting isolated sleep rhythms such as slow oscillations and spindles. What is the spatial scale of sleep rhythms? To answer this question, we adapted deep learning algorithms initially developed for detecting earthquakes and gravitational waves in high-noise settings for analysis of neural recordings in sleep. We then studied sleep spindles in non-human primate electrocorticography (ECoG), human electroencephalogram (EEG), and clinical intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) recordings in the human. Within each recording type, we find widespread spindles occur much more frequently than previously reported. We then analyzed the spatiotemporal patterns of these large-scale, multi-area spindles and, in the EEG recordings, how spindle patterns change following a visual memory task. Our results reveal a potential role for widespread, multi-area spindles in consolidation of memories in networks widely distributed across primate cortex. The brain processes memories as we sleep, generating rhythms of electrical activity called ‘sleep spindles’. Sleep spindles were long thought to be a state where the entire brain was fully synchronized by this rhythm. This was based on EEG recordings, short for electroencephalogram, a technique that uses electrodes on the scalp to measure electrical activity in the outermost layer of the brain, the cortex. But more recent intracranial recordings of people undergoing brain surgery have challenged this idea and suggested that sleep spindles may not be a state of global brain synchronization, but rather localised to specific areas. Mofrad et al. sought to clarify the extent to which spindles co-occur at multiple sites in the brain, which could shed light on how networks of neurons coordinate memory storage during sleep. To analyse highly variable brain wave recordings, Mofrad et al. adapted deep learning algorithms initially developed for detecting earthquakes and gravitational waves. The resulting algorithm, designed to more sensitively detect spindles amongst other brain activity, was then applied to a range of sleep recordings from humans and macaque monkeys. The analyses revealed that widespread and complex patterns of spindle rhythms, spanning multiple areas in the cortex of the brain, actually appear much more frequently than previously thought. This finding was consistent across all the recordings analysed, even recordings under the skull, which provide the clearest window into brain circuits. Further analyses found that these multi-area spindles occurred more often in sleep after people had completed tasks that required holding many visual scenes in memory, as opposed to control conditions with fewer visual scenes. In summary, Mofrad et al. show that neuroscientists had previously not appreciated the complex and dynamic patterns in this sleep rhythm. These patterns in sleep spindles may be able to adapt based on the demands needed for memory storage, and this will be the subject of future work. Moreover, the findings support the idea that sleep spindles help coordinate the consolidation of memories in brain circuits that stretch across the cortex. Understanding this mechanism may provide insights into how memory falters in aging and sleep-related diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease. Lastly, the algorithm developed by Mofrad et al. stands to be a useful tool for analysing other rhythmic waveforms in noisy recordings.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
The brain processes memories as we sleep, generating rhythms of electrical activity called ‘sleep spindles’. Sleep spindles were long thought to be a state where the entire brain was fully synchronized by this rhythm. This was based on EEG recordings, short for electroencephalogram, a technique that uses electrodes on the scalp to measure electrical activity in the outermost layer of the brain, the cortex. But more recent intracranial recordings of people undergoing brain surgery have challenged this idea and suggested that sleep spindles may not be a state of global brain synchronization, but rather localised to specific areas. Mofrad et al. sought to clarify the extent to which spindles co-occur at multiple sites in the brain, which could shed light on how networks of neurons coordinate memory storage during sleep. To analyse highly variable brain wave recordings, Mofrad et al. adapted deep learning algorithms initially developed for detecting earthquakes and gravitational waves. The resulting algorithm, designed to more sensitively detect spindles amongst other brain activity, was then applied to a range of sleep recordings from humans and macaque monkeys. The analyses revealed that widespread and complex patterns of spindle rhythms, spanning multiple areas in the cortex of the brain, actually appear much more frequently than previously thought. This finding was consistent across all the recordings analysed, even recordings under the skull, which provide the clearest window into brain circuits. Further analyses found that these multi-area spindles occurred more often in sleep after people had completed tasks that required holding many visual scenes in memory, as opposed to control conditions with fewer visual scenes. In summary, Mofrad et al. show that neuroscientists had previously not appreciated the complex and dynamic patterns in this sleep rhythm. These patterns in sleep spindles may be able to adapt based on the demands needed for memory storage, and this will be the subject of future work. Moreover, the findings support the idea that sleep spindles help coordinate the consolidation of memories in brain circuits that stretch across the cortex. Understanding this mechanism may provide insights into how memory falters in aging and sleep-related diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease. Lastly, the algorithm developed by Mofrad et al. stands to be a useful tool for analysing other rhythmic waveforms in noisy recordings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35766286
doi: 10.7554/eLife.75769
pii: 75769
pmc: PMC9242645
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2022, Mofrad et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MM, GG, DK, SM, JB, DS, AK, AS, LM No competing interests declared
Références
Physiol Rev. 2020 Apr 1;100(2):805-868
pubmed: 31804897
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Feb;19(2):107-118
pubmed: 29321683
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 15;8(11):e80845
pubmed: 24260491
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 18;12(1):6057
pubmed: 34663796
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Oct;22(10):1598-1610
pubmed: 31451802
Sleep. 2016 Sep 01;39(9):1719-35
pubmed: 27397568
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jul;104(1):179-88
pubmed: 20427615
J Physiol. 1967 Sep;192(2):283-307
pubmed: 4292908
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:1-12
pubmed: 25450108
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010 Jun;98(3):278-84
pubmed: 19818524
Nat Protoc. 2018 Jul;13(7):1699-1723
pubmed: 29988107
Neuroinformatics. 2011 Dec;9(4):381-400
pubmed: 21373993
J Neurosci. 1997 Sep 1;17(17):6783-97
pubmed: 9254689
Elife. 2016 Nov 15;5:
pubmed: 27855061
Nat Methods. 2014 Apr;11(4):385-92
pubmed: 24562424
J Neurosci. 1999 Jun 1;19(11):4595-608
pubmed: 10341257
Sci Adv. 2018 Feb 14;4(2):e1700578
pubmed: 29487899
Psychol Rev. 1995 Jul;102(3):419-457
pubmed: 7624455
Sci Data. 2020 Jul 15;7(1):237
pubmed: 32669554
Neuron. 2011 Apr 14;70(1):153-69
pubmed: 21482364
J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Mar 15;3(2):121-31
pubmed: 17557422
Neuroimage. 2005 Oct 15;28(1):14-21
pubmed: 15979343
J Neurophysiol. 2010 May;103(5):2315-7
pubmed: 20220081
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:511-37
pubmed: 21943170
Physiol Rev. 2013 Apr;93(2):681-766
pubmed: 23589831
Data Brief. 2018 Apr 25;18:1513-1519
pubmed: 29904654
J Neurosci. 2006 Dec 13;26(50):12914-20
pubmed: 17167082
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:236-245
pubmed: 27840241
J Neurosci. 2011 Dec 7;31(49):17821-34
pubmed: 22159098
Neuroscience. 2005;132(2):529-35
pubmed: 15802203
J Neurosci. 1998 Dec 15;18(24):10464-72
pubmed: 9852584
Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 28;5:3675
pubmed: 24770473
Psychophysiology. 2010 Sep;47(5):888-904
pubmed: 20374541
Neuron. 2014 Jan 8;81(1):12-34
pubmed: 24411729
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 11;108(41):17207-12
pubmed: 21949372
Science. 1997 Jan 10;275(5297):209-13
pubmed: 8985013
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;122(2):229-35
pubmed: 20637689
Ann Neurol. 2020 Feb;87(2):289-301
pubmed: 31777112
Sci Data. 2020 Jan 21;7(1):30
pubmed: 31964868
Behav Neurosci. 2007 Feb;121(1):1-10
pubmed: 17324046
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:425-32
pubmed: 24176868
J Comput Neurosci. 2009 Dec;27(3):493-506
pubmed: 19499317
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Dec 14;11(12):e1004584
pubmed: 26657024
Brain. 2018 Apr 1;141(4):1130-1144
pubmed: 29506200
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 7;104(32):13164-9
pubmed: 17670944
J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 6;33(10):4494-504
pubmed: 23467365
Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):709-13
pubmed: 17581587
Neuroscience. 1998 Aug;85(4):1195-208
pubmed: 9681957
Science. 1997 Jan 10;275(5297):213-5
pubmed: 8985014
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 30;105(39):15160-5
pubmed: 18815373
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1608-13
pubmed: 19164756
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Feb 23;18(1):124
pubmed: 28231759
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 28;29(43):13484-93
pubmed: 19864561
Sleep. 2004 Dec 15;27(8):1479-85
pubmed: 15683137
Science. 1935 Jun 14;81(2111):597-8
pubmed: 17739875
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Dec;17(6):698-703
pubmed: 18222688
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2033-44
pubmed: 20851191
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Dec;32(12):2217-27
pubmed: 21337472
Science. 2017 Apr 7;356(6333):73-78
pubmed: 28386011
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Feb;6(2):119-30
pubmed: 15685217
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 26;97(20):11125-9
pubmed: 11005879
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Sep;3(9):919-26
pubmed: 10966623
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 26;8:15930
pubmed: 28649997
Neuroscientist. 2021 Aug;27(4):427-444
pubmed: 32713292
Prog Neurobiol. 2012 Sep;98(3):279-301
pubmed: 22750156
J Neurosci. 1995 Jan;15(1 Pt 2):604-22
pubmed: 7823167
Sleep. 2014 Jul 01;37(7):1163-70
pubmed: 25061244
J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 19;31(42):14998-5008
pubmed: 22016533
Brain Res. 2000 Dec 15;886(1-2):208-223
pubmed: 11119697
Sci Data. 2020 Jun 16;7(1):179
pubmed: 32546753
Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Nov 15;5:45
pubmed: 22110429
Science. 1996 Nov 1;274(5288):771-4
pubmed: 8864114
J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 1;22(15):6830-4
pubmed: 12151563
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 May;35(10):1524-32
pubmed: 22606998
Front Biosci. 2003 May 01;8:d878-99
pubmed: 12700074