Assisted dying request assessments by trained consultants: changes in practice and quality - Repeated cross-sectional surveys (2008-2019).

Clinical decisions Education and training End of life care Ethics Service evaluation Terminal care

Journal

BMJ supportive & palliative care
ISSN: 2045-4368
Titre abrégé: BMJ Support Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101565123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 18 01 2022
accepted: 13 06 2022
entrez: 29 6 2022
pubmed: 30 6 2022
medline: 30 6 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To study changes in the peer consultation practice of assessing assisted dying requests and its quality among trained 'Life End Information Forum' (LEIF) consultants in Belgium between 2008 and 2019. Cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2008 (N=132) and 2019 (N=527) among all registered LEIF consultants. The response rate was 75% in 2008 and 57% in 2019. In 2019 compared with 2008, more LEIF consultants were significantly less than 40 years old (25%/10%, p=0.006) and at least 60 years old (34%/20%, p=0.006). In their activities regarding assessments of assisted dying requests over 12 months, we found a significant increase in the number of patients who did not meet the substantive requirements for assisted dying in 2019 compared with 2008 (1-4 patients: 41.1 %/58.8%, p=0.020). In their most recent assessments of an assisted dying request, LEIF consultants in 2019 made significantly more assessments of patients aged 80 years or older than in 2008 (31%/9%, p<0.001), and significantly fewer assessments for patients with cancer (53%/70%, p=0.034). Regarding adherence to quality criteria for consultation, LEIF consultants discussed unbearable suffering (87%/65%, p=0.003) and alternative treatments (palliative: 48 %/13%, p<0.001; curative: 28%/5%, p=0.002) significantly more often with the attending physician. Changes in peer consultation practice and its quality among LEIF consultants likely reflect changes in assisted dying practice in general, as well as changes in LEIF consultations on more complex cases for which LEIF consultants' expertise is required.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35768204
pii: spcare-2021-003502
doi: 10.1136/spcare-2021-003502
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: FM teaches in the LEIF training. Stijn Vissers, Sigrid Dierickx, Luc Deliens, Kenneth Chambaere, and Joachim Cohen declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Stijn Vissers (S)

End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium Stijn.Vissers@vub.be.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Sigrid Dierickx (S)

End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Kenneth Chambaere (K)

End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Luc Deliens (L)

End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Freddy Mortier (F)

End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Joachim Cohen (J)

End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH