A transposed-word effect on word-in-sequence identification.
Interactive processing
Reading
Transposed words
Parallel processing
Rapid parallel visual presentation (RPVP)
Journal
Psychonomic bulletin & review
ISSN: 1531-5320
Titre abrégé: Psychon Bull Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502924
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
accepted:
22
05
2022
pubmed:
30
6
2022
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
29
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present study investigated transposed-word effects in a post-cued word-in-sequence identification experiment. Five horizontally aligned words were simultaneously presented for a brief duration and followed by a backward mask and cue for the position of the word to be identified within the sequence. The five-word sequences could form a grammatically correct sentence (e.g., The boy can run fast), an ungrammatical transposed-word sequence (e.g., The can boy run fast) or an ungrammatical control sequence (e.g., The can get run fast), and the same target word at the same position (e.g., the word 'run') was tested in the three conditions. Consistent with previous studies using a grammatical decision task and a same-different matching task, a transposed-word effect was observed, with word identification being more accurate in transposed-word sequences than in control sequences. Furthermore, here we could show for the first time that word identification was more accurate in correct sentences compared with transposed-word sequences. We suggest that the word identification advantage found for transposed-word sequences compared with ungrammatical control sequences is due to facilitatory feedback to word identities from sentence-level representations, albeit with less strength compared to the feedback provided by correct sentences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35768660
doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02132-x
pii: 10.3758/s13423-022-02132-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2284-2292Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Références
Angele, B., Baciero, A., Gómez, P., & Perea, M. (2022). Does online masked priming pass the test? The effects of prime exposure duration on masked identity priming. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01742-y
Asano, M., & Yokosawa, K. (2011). Rapid extraction of gist from visual text and its influence on word recognition. The Journal of General Psychology, 138(2), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2010.542510
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Brascamp, J. W. (2021). Controlling the spatial dimensions of visual stimuli in online experiments. Journal of Vision, 21(8), 19. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.8.19
Christianson, K. (2016). When language comprehension goes wrong for the right reasons: Good-enough, underspecified, or shallow language processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1134603
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
Declerck, M., Wen, Y., Snell, J., Meade, G., & Grainger, J. (2020). Unified syntax in the bilingual mind. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(1), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01666-x
Ferreira, F., & Lowder, M. W. (2016). Prediction, information structure, and good-enough language processing. In The psychology of learning and motivation. (Vol. 65, pp. 217–247). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2016.04.002
Finger, H., Goeke, C., Diekamp, D., Standvoß, K., & König, P. (2017). LabVanced: A unified JavaScript framework for online studies. International Conference on Computational Social Science (Cologne).
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R Companion to Applied Regression. Sage Publications.
Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115(3), 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012667
Grootswagers, T. (2020). A primer on running human behavioural experiments online. Behavior Research Methods, 52(6), 2283–2286. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01395-3
Huang, K.-J., & Staub, A. (2021a). Using eye tracking to investigate failure to notice word transpositions in reading. Cognition, 216, 104846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104846
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104846
Huang, K.-J., & Staub, A. (2021b). Why do readers fail to notice word transpositions, omissions, and repetitions? A review of recent evidence and theory. Lang & Ling Compass, 15(7), e12434. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12434
doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12434
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Li, Q., Joo, S. J., Yeatman, J. D., & Reinecke, K. (2020). Controlling for participants’ viewing distance in large-scale, psychophysical online experiments using a virtual chinrest. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57204-1
Liu, Z., Li, Y., Paterson, K. B., & Wang, J. (2020). A transposed-word effect in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(8), 3788–3794. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02114-y
Liu, Z., Li, Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Context but not reading speed modulates transposed-word effects in Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica, 215, 103272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103272
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103272
Liu, Z., Li, Y., Cutter, M. G., Paterson, K. B., & Wang, J. (2022). A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese. Cognition, 218, 104922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922
Massol, S., Mirault, J., & Grainger, J. (2021). The contribution of semantics to the sentence superiority effect. Scientific Reports, 11, 20148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99565-6
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
Mirault, J., Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2018). You that read wrong again! A transposed-word effect in grammaticality judgments. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1922–1929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618806296
Mirault, J., Guerre-Genton, A., Dufau, S., & Grainger, J. (2020). Using virtual reality to study reading: An eye-tracking investigation of transposed-word effects. Methods in Psychology, 3, 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2020.100029
doi: 10.1016/j.metip.2020.100029
Mirault, J., Vandendaele, A., Pegado, F., & Grainger, J. (2022). Transposed-word effects when reading serially. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
Pegado, F., & Grainger, J. (2019). Dissociating lexical and sublexical contributions to transposed-word effects. Acta Psychologica, 201, 102943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102943
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102943
Pegado, F., & Grainger, J. (2020). A transposed-word effect in same-different judgments to sequences of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(7), 1364–1371. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000776
Pegado, F., & Grainger, J. (2021). On the noisy spatiotopic encoding of word positions during reading: Evidence from the change-detection task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(1), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01819-3
Pegado, F., Wen, Y., Mirault, J., Dufau, S., & Grainger, J. (2021). An ERP investigation of transposed-word effects in same-different matching. Neuropsychologia, 153, 107753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107753
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107753
R Core Team. (2021). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2017). The sentence superiority effect revisited. Cognition, 168, 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.003
Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019). Word position coding in reading is noisy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 609–615. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01574-0
Snell, J., Meeter, M., & Grainger, J. (2017). Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading. PLoS One, 12(3), e0173720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173720
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173720
Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M. (2018). OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 125(6), 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000119
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
Wen, Y., Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019). Parallel, cascaded, interactive processing of words during sentence reading. Cognition, 189, 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.013
Wen, Y., Mirault, J., & Grainger, J. (2021a). Fast syntax in the brain: Electrophysiological evidence from the rapid parallel visual presentation paradigm (RPVP). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000811
Wen, Y., Mirault, J., & Grainger, J. (2021b). The transposed-word effect revisited: The role of syntax in word position coding. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36(5), 668–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.1880608