Warfarin versus factor Xa inhibitors in the long-term treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis a single-center retrospective analysis.
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
DOACs
Factor Xa inhibitors
Retrospective analysis
Warfarin
Journal
eNeurologicalSci
ISSN: 2405-6502
Titre abrégé: eNeurologicalSci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101667077
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
23
02
2022
revised:
30
05
2022
accepted:
10
06
2022
entrez:
30
6
2022
pubmed:
1
7
2022
medline:
1
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Long-term anticoagulation in the treatment of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) has revolved around the use of warfarin. The relatively recent introduction of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), such as Factor Xa inhibitors, in treating CVSTs promises to offer numerous patient benefits. We aimed to examine the efficacy of Factor Xa inhibitors in comparison to warfarin in the long-term treatment of CVSTs. A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in which 49 eligible patients having presented with a first-time CVST were identified. Long-term anticoagulation was achieved with Warfarin (n = 23) or Factor Xa Inhibitors (n = 26; Apixaban or Rivaroxaban). Outcomes of interest were improvements in patient functional status, modified Ranking Scores (mRS), and radiographic improvement/resolution in sinus thromboses. Secondary comparisons included complication rates, particularly recurring venous thrombotic events. Patient mRS scores by 7-to-18-month follow-up all fell within the extremely favorable range of 0-1 regardless of the long-term anticoagulant (P-value = 0.3591). Proportion of patients with radiographic improvement/resolution of thrombosed sinuses trended towards being higher in the Factor Xa Inhibitor group at the <12-month period, 69.2%, compared to 33.3% with Warfarin (
Identifiants
pubmed: 35769920
doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2022.100412
pii: S2405-6502(22)00021-1
pmc: PMC9234611
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100412Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e040212
pubmed: 33593766
J Stroke. 2019 May;21(2):220-223
pubmed: 31161765
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;48(1-2):32-37
pubmed: 31480062
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 15;11(9):e0163386
pubmed: 27631606
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e601S-e636S
pubmed: 22315273
Thromb Res. 2013 Aug;132(2):e124-30
pubmed: 23800635
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2015 Oct;20(4):357-61
pubmed: 26492115
Case Rep Hematol. 2020 Sep 17;2020:8849252
pubmed: 33014481
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jul;18(7):1637-1647
pubmed: 32291874
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jul 7;9(13):e017559
pubmed: 32538234
Thromb Res. 2009 Jun;124(2):239-40
pubmed: 18835632
Stroke. 2004 Feb;35(2):544-7
pubmed: 14715977
Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2180-2
pubmed: 27435401
Stroke. 1996 Feb;27(2):243-6
pubmed: 8571417
Thromb J. 2015 Mar 14;13:13
pubmed: 25788868
Surgery. 2019 Dec;166(6):1076-1083
pubmed: 31277885
Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Nov;27(5):E3
pubmed: 19877794
Ann Pharmacother. 2021 Mar;55(3):286-293
pubmed: 32844675
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;198:106204
pubmed: 32937276
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2006 May;5(3):433-51
pubmed: 16610971
Stroke. 1988 May;19(5):604-7
pubmed: 3363593
Hemasphere. 2018 Feb 02;2(1):e19
pubmed: 31723748
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:464-70
pubmed: 24319220
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 2;100(26):e26360
pubmed: 34190153
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1457-1465
pubmed: 31479105
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011 Apr;31(3):326-43
pubmed: 21359645
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Oct;50(3):724-731
pubmed: 32279216
J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Apr;3(4):692-4
pubmed: 15842354
Pract Neurol. 2020 Oct;20(5):356-367
pubmed: 32958591
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2014 Jul;5(3):218-24
pubmed: 25002759