Acupuncture as a Complementary Therapy for Cancer Care: Acceptability and Preferences of Patients and Informal Caregivers.

Acupuncture Cancer Cancerrelated side effect Complementary therapy Informal caregiver

Journal

Journal of acupuncture and meridian studies
ISSN: 2093-8152
Titre abrégé: J Acupunct Meridian Stud
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101490763

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 01 09 2020
revised: 11 02 2021
accepted: 21 02 2021
entrez: 30 6 2022
pubmed: 30 4 2021
medline: 2 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Acupuncture can effectively manage cancer-related side effects, for both patients undergoing treatment and for cancer survivors. It may also be effective in managing physiological and psychological symptoms common among informal caregivers of cancer patients. The aim of this survey was to explore the acceptability and preferences of cancer patients, cancer survivors, and their informal caregivers in relation to acupuncture. The survey was conducted from 20 The survey response rate was 94.5% in cancer patients and cancer survivors and 100% in caregivers. Acceptability of acupuncture was 34.5% (n = 40/116) and 48.0% (n = 26/54) in cancer patients and caregivers, respectively. About 52.5% (n = 21/40) of patients preferred to undergo acupuncture at the day center clinic, whereas caregivers had no specific preference. Patients and cancer survivors would use acupuncture for symptoms of fatigue (60%), listlessness (57.5%), and pain (47.5%). Informal caregivers expressed an interest in using acupuncture for their pain, stress, and sleeping difficulties 48.0% (n = 26/54). Cancer patients, cancer survivors, and informal caregivers would accept acupuncture as a complementary therapy. This openness and preference to acupuncture provide the foundations for this complementary therapy to be incorporated into holistic and supportive cancer care, both for patients and those supporting them.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Acupuncture can effectively manage cancer-related side effects, for both patients undergoing treatment and for cancer survivors. It may also be effective in managing physiological and psychological symptoms common among informal caregivers of cancer patients.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
The aim of this survey was to explore the acceptability and preferences of cancer patients, cancer survivors, and their informal caregivers in relation to acupuncture.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The survey was conducted from 20
Results UNASSIGNED
The survey response rate was 94.5% in cancer patients and cancer survivors and 100% in caregivers. Acceptability of acupuncture was 34.5% (n = 40/116) and 48.0% (n = 26/54) in cancer patients and caregivers, respectively. About 52.5% (n = 21/40) of patients preferred to undergo acupuncture at the day center clinic, whereas caregivers had no specific preference. Patients and cancer survivors would use acupuncture for symptoms of fatigue (60%), listlessness (57.5%), and pain (47.5%). Informal caregivers expressed an interest in using acupuncture for their pain, stress, and sleeping difficulties 48.0% (n = 26/54).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Cancer patients, cancer survivors, and informal caregivers would accept acupuncture as a complementary therapy. This openness and preference to acupuncture provide the foundations for this complementary therapy to be incorporated into holistic and supportive cancer care, both for patients and those supporting them.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35770541
pii: j.jams.2021.14.2.67
doi: 10.51507/j.jams.2021.14.2.67
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

67-74

Auteurs

Laura Tack (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Tessa Lefebvre (T)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Virginie Blieck (V)

College for Traditional Chinese Medicine & Karel de Grote University College, Antwerp, Belgium.

Lieselot Cool (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.

Hans Pottel (H)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care at Kulak, Catholic University Leuven Kulak, Kortrijk, Belgium.

Koen Van Eygen (KV)

Department of Haematology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.

Sofie Derijcke (S)

Department of Pneumology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.

Philippe Vergauwe (P)

Department of Gastro-Enterology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.

Patricia Schofield (P)

Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Rebecca Chandler (R)

Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.

Pauline Lane (P)

Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.

Tom Boterberg (T)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Philip R Debruyne (PR)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH