Effect of a 2-week interruption in methotrexate treatment versus continued treatment on COVID-19 booster vaccine immunity in adults with inflammatory conditions (VROOM study): a randomised, open label, superiority trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Respiratory medicine
ISSN: 2213-2619
Titre abrégé: Lancet Respir Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
18
04
2022
revised:
11
05
2022
accepted:
12
05
2022
pubmed:
1
7
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
entrez:
30
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Immunosuppressive treatments inhibit vaccine-induced immunity against SARS-CoV-2. We evaluated whether a 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment immediately after the COVID-19 vaccine booster improved antibody responses against the S1 receptor-binding domain (S1-RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein compared with uninterrupted treatment in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. We did an open-label, prospective, two-arm, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial in 26 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults from rheumatology and dermatology clinics who had been diagnosed with an immune-mediated inflammatory disease (eg, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis with or without arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, atopic dermatitis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and systemic lupus erythematosus) and who were taking low-dose weekly methotrexate (≤25 mg per week) for at least 3 months. Participants also had to have received two primary vaccine doses from the UK COVID-19 vaccination programme. We randomly assigned the participants (1:1), using a centralised validated computer randomisation program, to suspend methotrexate treatment for 2 weeks immediately after their COVID-19 booster (suspend methotrexate group) or to continue treatment as usual (continue methotrexate group). Participants, investigators, clinical research staff, and data analysts were unmasked, while researchers doing the laboratory analyses were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was S1-RBD antibody titres 4 weeks after receiving the COVID-19 booster vaccine dose, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ISRCT, ISRCTN11442263; following the pre-planned interim analysis, recruitment was stopped early. Between Sept 30, 2021 and March 3, 2022, we recruited 340 participants, of whom 254 were included in the interim analysis and had been randomly assigned to one of the two groups: 127 in the continue methotrexate group and 127 in the suspend methotrexate group. Their mean age was 59·1 years, 155 (61%) were female, 130 (51%) had rheumatoid arthritis, and 86 (34%) had psoriasis with or without arthritis. After 4 weeks, the geometric mean S1-RBD antibody titre was 22 750 U/mL (95% CI 19 314-26 796) in the suspend methotrexate group and 10 798 U/mL (8970-12 997) in the continue methotrexate group, with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 2·19 (95% CI 1·57-3·04; p<0·0001; mixed-effects model). The increased antibody response in the suspend methotrexate group was consistent across methotrexate dose, administration route, type of immune-mediated inflammatory disease, age, primary vaccination platform, and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. There were no intervention-related serious adverse events. A 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment for people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases resulted in enhanced boosting of antibody responses after COVID-19 vaccination. This intervention is simple, low-cost, and easy to implement, and could potentially translate to increased vaccine efficacy and duration of protection for susceptible groups. National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Immunosuppressive treatments inhibit vaccine-induced immunity against SARS-CoV-2. We evaluated whether a 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment immediately after the COVID-19 vaccine booster improved antibody responses against the S1 receptor-binding domain (S1-RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein compared with uninterrupted treatment in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
METHODS
We did an open-label, prospective, two-arm, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial in 26 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults from rheumatology and dermatology clinics who had been diagnosed with an immune-mediated inflammatory disease (eg, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis with or without arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, atopic dermatitis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and systemic lupus erythematosus) and who were taking low-dose weekly methotrexate (≤25 mg per week) for at least 3 months. Participants also had to have received two primary vaccine doses from the UK COVID-19 vaccination programme. We randomly assigned the participants (1:1), using a centralised validated computer randomisation program, to suspend methotrexate treatment for 2 weeks immediately after their COVID-19 booster (suspend methotrexate group) or to continue treatment as usual (continue methotrexate group). Participants, investigators, clinical research staff, and data analysts were unmasked, while researchers doing the laboratory analyses were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was S1-RBD antibody titres 4 weeks after receiving the COVID-19 booster vaccine dose, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ISRCT, ISRCTN11442263; following the pre-planned interim analysis, recruitment was stopped early.
FINDINGS
Between Sept 30, 2021 and March 3, 2022, we recruited 340 participants, of whom 254 were included in the interim analysis and had been randomly assigned to one of the two groups: 127 in the continue methotrexate group and 127 in the suspend methotrexate group. Their mean age was 59·1 years, 155 (61%) were female, 130 (51%) had rheumatoid arthritis, and 86 (34%) had psoriasis with or without arthritis. After 4 weeks, the geometric mean S1-RBD antibody titre was 22 750 U/mL (95% CI 19 314-26 796) in the suspend methotrexate group and 10 798 U/mL (8970-12 997) in the continue methotrexate group, with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 2·19 (95% CI 1·57-3·04; p<0·0001; mixed-effects model). The increased antibody response in the suspend methotrexate group was consistent across methotrexate dose, administration route, type of immune-mediated inflammatory disease, age, primary vaccination platform, and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. There were no intervention-related serious adverse events.
INTERPRETATION
A 2-week interruption of methotrexate treatment for people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases resulted in enhanced boosting of antibody responses after COVID-19 vaccination. This intervention is simple, low-cost, and easy to implement, and could potentially translate to increased vaccine efficacy and duration of protection for susceptible groups.
FUNDING
National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35772416
pii: S2213-2600(22)00186-2
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00186-2
pmc: PMC9236568
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
0
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2
0
Methotrexate
YL5FZ2Y5U1
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN11442263']
Types de publication
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
840-850Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/W020610/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Investigateurs
Ira Pande
(I)
Ting Seng Tang
(T)
Gui Tran
(G)
Alison Layton
(A)
Elizabeth Price
(E)
Lindsay Whittam
(L)
Srinivasan Venkatachalam
(S)
Ashley Hawarden
(A)
Gwenan Huws
(G)
Arthur Pratt
(A)
Nick J Reynolds
(NJ)
David Walsh
(D)
Theresa Joseph
(T)
Rengi Mathew
(R)
Stamatios Oikonomou
(S)
Catherine Gwynne
(C)
Rory Crowder
(R)
Vadivelu Saravanan
(V)
Alaa Mustafa
(A)
Cristina Tacu
(C)
Thomas Batty
(T)
Emmanuel George
(E)
Anushka Soni
(A)
Sarah Horton
(S)
Ayesha Madan
(A)
Karl Gaffney
(K)
Agnieszka Lapin
(A)
Sarah Bingham
(S)
Nick Levell
(N)
Edwin Lim
(E)
Nicola Gullick
(N)
Chris Holroyd
(C)
Salema Khalid
(S)
May Lwin
(M)
Mike Green
(M)
Laura Hunt
(L)
Nicola Alcorn
(N)
Rob Ellis
(R)
Samantha Hider
(S)
Alaa Hassan
(A)
Taryn Youngstein
(T)
Karen Douglas
(K)
Gen Nen Ho
(GN)
Kirsty Levasseur
(K)
Sara Treacy
(S)
Myrto Cheila
(M)
John Pradeep
(J)
Ceril Rhys-Dillon
(C)
Catrin Jones
(C)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests The institutions of the authors received funding from the NIHR-MRC-EME programme (award number NIHR 134607) towards conducting this research. LC reports research grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, and personal consulting fees or lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Medac, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB in the past 36 months. JB reports research grants from Pfizer and travel or conference fees from UCB, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly. AA reports institutional research grants from AstraZeneca and Oxford Immunotec, personal author royalties from UpTodate and Springer, personal consulting fees from Inflazome and NGM Biopharmaceuticals, and personal payments for lectures from Menarini Pharmaceuticals and Cadilla Pharmaceuticals, in the past 36 months and unrelated to the current work. AA is also co-chair of the OMERACT CPPD Working Group and co-chair of the ACR/EULAR CPPD Classification Criteria Working Group. JSN-V-T was seconded to the Department of Health and Social Care in England until March 31, 2022.
Références
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2032-2040
pubmed: 34588689
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2258-2276
pubmed: 34863358
NPJ Vaccines. 2021 May 13;6(1):74
pubmed: 33986272
BMJ. 2022 Mar 2;376:e068632
pubmed: 35236664
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1205-1211
pubmed: 34002089
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Dec;81(12):1628-1639
pubmed: 35197264
Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1178-1181
pubmed: 33640037
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jun;82(6):1445-1486
pubmed: 32119894
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jun;81(6):889-897
pubmed: 35193873
Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;3(9):e627-e637
pubmed: 34258590
Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 Jan;4(1):e42-e52
pubmed: 34778846
Lancet. 2022 Mar 5;399(10328):924-944
pubmed: 35202601
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jun;81(6):881-888
pubmed: 35288376
BMJ Open. 2022 May 3;12(5):e062599
pubmed: 35504634
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jul;73(7):924-939
pubmed: 34101387
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Oct;80(10):1351-1352
pubmed: 34031032
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Oct;80(10):1317-1321
pubmed: 34144967
Science. 2021 Apr 30;:
pubmed: 33931567
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):2065-2072
pubmed: 33906236
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;73(7):1093-1107
pubmed: 33728796
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1207-1220
pubmed: 35172051
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Science. 2022 Jan 14;375(6577):183-192
pubmed: 34855510
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Oct;80(10):1339-1344
pubmed: 34035003
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep;76(9):1559-1565
pubmed: 28468794
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jun;77(6):898-904
pubmed: 29572291
Science. 2022 Jan 07;375(6576):43-50
pubmed: 34812653
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 10;386(6):599-601
pubmed: 35030645