Effect of body position on the redistribution of regional lung aeration during invasive and non-invasive ventilation of COVID-19 patients.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 06 2022
30 06 2022
Historique:
received:
29
12
2021
accepted:
20
06
2022
entrez:
30
6
2022
pubmed:
1
7
2022
medline:
6
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS) requires mechanical ventilation. While this intervention is often performed in the prone position to improve oxygenation, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the improvement in respiratory function during invasive ventilation and awake prone positioning in C-ARDS have not yet been elucidated. In this prospective observational trial, we evaluated the respiratory function of C-ARDS patients while in the supine and prone positions during invasive (n = 13) or non-invasive ventilation (n = 15). The primary endpoint was the positional change in lung regional aeration, assessed with electrical impedance tomography. Secondary endpoints included parameters of ventilation and oxygenation, volumetric capnography, respiratory system mechanics and intrapulmonary shunt fraction. In comparison to the supine position, the prone position significantly increased ventilation distribution in dorsal lung zones for patients under invasive ventilation (53.3 ± 18.3% vs. 43.8 ± 12.3%, percentage of dorsal lung aeration ± standard deviation in prone and supine positions, respectively; p = 0.014); whereas, regional aeration in both positions did not change during non-invasive ventilation (36.4 ± 11.4% vs. 33.7 ± 10.1%; p = 0.43). Prone positioning significantly improved the oxygenation both during invasive and non-invasive ventilation. For invasively ventilated patients reduced intrapulmonary shunt fraction, ventilation dead space and respiratory resistance were observed in the prone position. Oxygenation is improved during non-invasive and invasive ventilation with prone positioning in patients with C-ARDS. Different mechanisms may underly this benefit during these two ventilation modalities, driven by improved distribution of lung regional aeration, intrapulmonary shunt fraction and ventilation-perfusion matching. However, the differences in the severity of C-ARDS may have biased the sensitivity of electrical impedance tomography when comparing positional changes between the protocol groups.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04359407) and Registered 24 April 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04359407 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 35773299
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15122-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-15122-9
pmc: PMC9245873
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04359407']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11085Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S280-S288
pubmed: 29068269
Crit Care. 2020 Jun 15;24(1):339
pubmed: 32539769
Clin Chest Med. 1988 Mar;9(1):141-52
pubmed: 3280227
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Dec;9(12):1387-1395
pubmed: 34425070
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;157(2):387-93
pubmed: 9476848
Crit Care. 2020 Sep 1;24(1):540
pubmed: 32873337
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33
pubmed: 22797452
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2021 Apr;64(4):407-415
pubmed: 33180562
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246318
pubmed: 33571301
Crit Care. 2020 Dec 7;24(1):678
pubmed: 33287864
Nat Immunol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1146-1151
pubmed: 32855555
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Apr 1;169(7):791-800
pubmed: 14693669
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1927-1929
pubmed: 32699915
Thorax. 2017 Jan;72(1):83-93
pubmed: 27596161
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;48(1):56-66
pubmed: 34825929
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 15;201(10):1299-1300
pubmed: 32228035
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;117(1):109-17
pubmed: 27317710
Fed Proc. 1948 Mar;7(1 Pt 1):35
pubmed: 18932700
Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):e219-e234
pubmed: 33555780
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2021 Mar 1;320(3):L368-L376
pubmed: 33264577
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 19;11(6):
pubmed: 35330029
Crit Care. 2016 May 05;20(1):121
pubmed: 27145818
Eur Respir J. 2020 Dec 10;56(6):
pubmed: 33008941
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2338-2340
pubmed: 32412606
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):765-774
pubmed: 32569585
Anesth Analg. 2012 Apr;114(4):866-74
pubmed: 22383673
Crit Care. 2021 Dec 16;25(1):429
pubmed: 34915916
Crit Care. 2021 Jul 30;25(1):268
pubmed: 34330320
Emerg Radiol. 2020 Dec;27(6):671-678
pubmed: 33037946
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1335
pubmed: 32181795
Eur Respir J. 1999 May;13(5):1048-54
pubmed: 10414403
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Dec;24(4):287-292
pubmed: 32924792
Free Radic Biol Med. 2008 Sep 1;45(5):562-9
pubmed: 18549826
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000;184(2):415-28; discussion 428-30
pubmed: 10989548
Adv Med Sci. 2021 Sep;66(2):388-395
pubmed: 34371248
Biomed Pharmacother. 1990;44(8):435-7
pubmed: 2271742
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1545-1546
pubmed: 32167538
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug 13;:
pubmed: 34386896
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):1132-7
pubmed: 19255741
Thorax. 2020 Nov;75(11):1009-1016
pubmed: 32839287
Minerva Anestesiol. 1999 Jun;65(6):388-92
pubmed: 10394807