Value of Preoperative Imaging Results in Predicting Cochlear Nerve Function in Children Diagnosed With Cochlear Nerve Aplasia Based on Imaging Results.
cochlear implantation
cochlear nerve aplasia
cochlear nerve deficiency
electrically evoked compound action potential
imaging
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
26
03
2022
accepted:
29
04
2022
entrez:
1
7
2022
pubmed:
2
7
2022
medline:
2
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to assess the function of the cochlear nerve using electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) for children with cochlear implants who were diagnosed with cochlear nerve aplasia and to analyze the correlation between preimplantation imaging results and ECAP responses. Thirty-five children diagnosed with cochlear nerve aplasia based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Preimplantation MRI and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images were reconstructed, and the width of the bone cochlear nerve canal (BCNC), the diameter of the vestibulocochlear nerve (VCN), and the diameter of the facial nerve (FN) were measured. ECAP input/output (I/O) functions were measured at three electrode locations along the electrode array for each participant. The relationship between ECAP responses (including ECAP threshold, ECAP maximum amplitude, and slope of ECAP I/O function) and sizes of the BCNC and VCN was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Our analysis revealed that ECAP responses varied greatly among individual participants. Overall, ECAP thresholds gradually increased, while maximum amplitudes and ECAP I/O function slopes gradually decreased, as the electrode location moved from the basal to the apical direction in the cochlea. ECAP responses exhibited no significant correlations with BCNC width or VCN diameter. The ratio of the VCN to FN diameters was significantly correlated with the slope of the ECAP I/O function and the maximum amplitude. BCNC width could not predict the function of the cochlear nerve. Compared with the absolute size of the VCN, the size of the VCN relative to the FN may represent an indicator for predicting the functional status of the cochlear nerve in children diagnosed with cochlear nerve aplasia based on imaging results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35774558
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.905244
pmc: PMC9237450
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
905244Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Chao, Wang, Luo, Wang, Fan and Xu.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Apr;15(2):187-202
pubmed: 24469861
Radiology. 1997 Mar;202(3):773-81
pubmed: 9051033
Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):184-97
pubmed: 18515023
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Jul;143(1):101-8
pubmed: 20620627
Hear Res. 2015 Dec;330(Pt A):98-105
pubmed: 26209185
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Sep;31(7):1088-94
pubmed: 20634773
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Dec;38(10):e413-e420
pubmed: 29076926
J Int Adv Otol. 2020 Aug;16(2):147-152
pubmed: 32784150
Ear Hear. 2020 May/Jun;41(3):465-475
pubmed: 31567301
Ear Hear. 2020 Aug 07;42(1):180-192
pubmed: 32826505
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;137:110173
pubmed: 32658798
Cochlear Implants Int. 2010 Mar;11(1):4-41
pubmed: 19358145
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Aug;32(6):956-61
pubmed: 21659925
Acta Otolaryngol. 2016 Oct;136(10):1051-7
pubmed: 27187111
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Mar 21;2018:5675848
pubmed: 29750161
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):1154
pubmed: 30718613
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Aug;40(7):e679-e685
pubmed: 31219961
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;106:72-74
pubmed: 29447896
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep;157(3):392-400
pubmed: 28675079
J Int Adv Otol. 2020 Aug;16(2):271-273
pubmed: 32510457
Acta Radiol. 2013 Apr 1;54(3):292-8
pubmed: 23319716
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jan;36(1):14-21
pubmed: 25226378
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jun 23;11:339
pubmed: 28690494
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jun;37(5):438-45
pubmed: 27050647
Balkan Med J. 2017 Sep 29;34(5):397-411
pubmed: 28840850
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;76(10):1442-8
pubmed: 22921779
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;9(3):220-5
pubmed: 27337951
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jan;42(1):38-46
pubmed: 32976344
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jun;78(6):912-7
pubmed: 24690223
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jul;125(7):1691-6
pubmed: 25878020
Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Sep;40(9):1509-16
pubmed: 20309536
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992 Dec;101(12):988-93
pubmed: 1463299
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):977-84
pubmed: 25634467
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep;112:132-140
pubmed: 30055722
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):238-250
pubmed: 28678078
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1306-1319
pubmed: 32141933
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013 Dec 25;12(4):241-7
pubmed: 24172790