Satisfaction evaluation for ACLS training.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2022
01 07 2022
Historique:
received:
11
06
2022
accepted:
22
06
2022
entrez:
1
7
2022
pubmed:
2
7
2022
medline:
6
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
simulation became gradually pivotal in training of health professionals: indeed, it showed an improvement in practical skill of the trainees compared to theoretical lectures. Among others, ACLS (advance cardiovascular life support) courses are now one of the standard learning practices most spread around the world. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate both the level of satisfaction and the clinical thinking that the trainees perceived during an ACLS course. This was performed via the SSE validated scale (Satisfaction with simulation experience scale). The secondary aim was to evaluate if demographics affect the aforementioned perceived satisfaction. a SSE questionnaire was distributed after the ACLS section of practical scenarios, just before the end of the course and of the practical test. 72 questionnaires have been collected. The sample was constituted by 68.1% of females, 44,4% by nurses without a master's degree, and 52,8% personnel that works outside of a critical care setting. QTOT Median score was 89 (IQR=86-90), DTOT Median's 45 (IQR= 44.25-45), RTOT Median's 25 (IQR=22-25), LTOT Median was 20 (IQR=19-20). Conclusions: The ACLS course attains a high grade of satisfaction on all of the three aspects evaluated by the questionnaire. The perception was not influenced by the demographics.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
simulation became gradually pivotal in training of health professionals: indeed, it showed an improvement in practical skill of the trainees compared to theoretical lectures. Among others, ACLS (advance cardiovascular life support) courses are now one of the standard learning practices most spread around the world. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate both the level of satisfaction and the clinical thinking that the trainees perceived during an ACLS course. This was performed via the SSE validated scale (Satisfaction with simulation experience scale). The secondary aim was to evaluate if demographics affect the aforementioned perceived satisfaction.
METHODS
a SSE questionnaire was distributed after the ACLS section of practical scenarios, just before the end of the course and of the practical test.
RESULTS
72 questionnaires have been collected. The sample was constituted by 68.1% of females, 44,4% by nurses without a master's degree, and 52,8% personnel that works outside of a critical care setting. QTOT Median score was 89 (IQR=86-90), DTOT Median's 45 (IQR= 44.25-45), RTOT Median's 25 (IQR=22-25), LTOT Median was 20 (IQR=19-20). Conclusions: The ACLS course attains a high grade of satisfaction on all of the three aspects evaluated by the questionnaire. The perception was not influenced by the demographics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35775749
doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.13337
pmc: PMC9335416
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2022260Références
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Mar 7;44(1):e149-e152
pubmed: 34156071
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Aug;12(8):975-980
pubmed: 32565000
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;44(4):518-526
pubmed: 26017219
Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Oct;31(7):705-10
pubmed: 21288606
West J Nurs Res. 1991 Oct;13(5):616-26
pubmed: 1949762
Nurse Educ Today. 2001 Aug;21(6):477-86
pubmed: 11466011
Resuscitation. 2018 Aug;129:48-54
pubmed: 29902494
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016 Feb;27(1):56-61
pubmed: 26909454
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2021 Jun 18;18(1):
pubmed: 34139113
Resuscitation. 2008 Jul;78(1):59-65
pubmed: 18406037
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i2-10
pubmed: 15465951
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):529-33
pubmed: 9095016
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Apr 05;13:301-308
pubmed: 35411198
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):1143-7
pubmed: 25053263
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jan 10;:1-8
pubmed: 35000651
J Anesth. 2015 Feb;29(1):87-95
pubmed: 24993493
Acta Biomed. 2020 Nov 20;91(4):e2020195
pubmed: 33525234
Resuscitation. 2007 Mar;72(3):458-65
pubmed: 17307620
JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2808, 2811-2
pubmed: 12472306
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jan;23(1):56-9
pubmed: 8273960
Resuscitation. 2000 Sep;47(1):83-7
pubmed: 11004384
Acta Biomed. 2021 Mar 31;92(S2):e2021002
pubmed: 33855980
Med Educ. 2004 Jan;38(1):32-8
pubmed: 14962024
Simul Healthc. 2018 Jun;13(3S Suppl 1):S15-S20
pubmed: 29373384