Clinical implications of anticoagulant oral therapy in elderly patients with hip fracture.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2022
01 07 2022
Historique:
received:
23
11
2021
accepted:
02
12
2021
entrez:
1
7
2022
pubmed:
2
7
2022
medline:
6
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Proximal femur fractures (PFFs) are among the most common fractures, especially in the elderly population. A PFF often represents a life-changing event. Their dramatic effects are attributable not only to the massive hemorrhages caused by the fracture, but also to the high risk of dramatic complications. These risks are supposed to be even higher for patients under oral anticoagulant treatment. In this study we evaluated how oral anticoagulant therapy effected patient's prognosis. Methods:Ours was a case-control review of over-65 patients treated surgically for proximal femur fractures between 2013 and 2019. Cases were divided in 2 groups depending if they were (Group A) or were not (Group B) under oral anticoagulant therapy at the moment of hospitalization. Results:200 cases were included in our study: 100 in Group A and 100 in Group B. Surgical delay was significantly higher for cases under oral anticoagulant treatment compared to the other cases. Group A cases were transfused with a significantly higher frequency and with more blood units compared to Group B (p=0.0300; p=0.013). Combined cardiological and vascular complications occurred in 21 cases (10.5%), being significantly more common in Group A (16) than Group B (5), as testified by a chi-square test (P=0.011). Conclusions:Cases under oral anticoagulant therapy are frail patients with a higher risk to develop massive hemorrhages after an hip fracture. For this reason, it is mandatory to achieve an early stabilization of patient's clinical conditions and then perform surgery as soon as possible.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Proximal femur fractures (PFFs) are among the most common fractures, especially in the elderly population. A PFF often represents a life-changing event. Their dramatic effects are attributable not only to the massive hemorrhages caused by the fracture, but also to the high risk of dramatic complications. These risks are supposed to be even higher for patients under oral anticoagulant treatment. In this study we evaluated how oral anticoagulant therapy effected patient's prognosis. Methods:Ours was a case-control review of over-65 patients treated surgically for proximal femur fractures between 2013 and 2019. Cases were divided in 2 groups depending if they were (Group A) or were not (Group B) under oral anticoagulant therapy at the moment of hospitalization. Results:200 cases were included in our study: 100 in Group A and 100 in Group B. Surgical delay was significantly higher for cases under oral anticoagulant treatment compared to the other cases. Group A cases were transfused with a significantly higher frequency and with more blood units compared to Group B (p=0.0300; p=0.013). Combined cardiological and vascular complications occurred in 21 cases (10.5%), being significantly more common in Group A (16) than Group B (5), as testified by a chi-square test (P=0.011). Conclusions:Cases under oral anticoagulant therapy are frail patients with a higher risk to develop massive hemorrhages after an hip fracture. For this reason, it is mandatory to achieve an early stabilization of patient's clinical conditions and then perform surgery as soon as possible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35775766
doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.12606
pmc: PMC9335443
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2022071Références
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 17;8(1):13933
pubmed: 30224765
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2053-2062
pubmed: 29166235
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 21;(4):CD009699
pubmed: 25897628
Isr Med Assoc J. 2021 Aug;23(8):494-496
pubmed: 34392624
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):398-402
pubmed: 30391072
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Sep 02;16:158
pubmed: 27590604
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 31;1:CD012485
pubmed: 29385235
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3:1383-1393
pubmed: 34378190
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Aug 26;16(1):124
pubmed: 34448084
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Aug 4;26(1):86
pubmed: 34348796
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015 Jun;6(2):58-120
pubmed: 26246957
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Jun 24;11:843-56
pubmed: 27445466
Thromb Res. 2020 Oct;194:165-167
pubmed: 32788110
Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(5):407-13
pubmed: 9425497
Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(6):493-500
pubmed: 12107664
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017 Nov - Dec;61(6):427-435
pubmed: 28888685
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e019618
pubmed: 33759542
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Feb;28(2):63-9
pubmed: 23872716
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Feb;52(1):10-16
pubmed: 29594444