Hand hygiene practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors among barbers and beauty salon workers in Ethiopia.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
06
04
2021
accepted:
17
05
2022
entrez:
1
7
2022
pubmed:
2
7
2022
medline:
8
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is still causing morbidity and mortality all over the world. Preventive measures such as wearing a facemask, social distancing and hand hygiene continue to be the only options available in countries such as Ethiopia where vaccines are not yet widely available. Hand hygiene is one of the easiest and cheapest preventive measures, and one that is especially important for barbers and beauty salon workers who are widely exposed to the virus due to their contact with many customers. Therefore, measuring the proportion of good hand hygiene practices and associated factors among barbers and beauty salon workers may provide essential guidance in the development of effective interventions to improve COVID-19 prevention measures. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 410 barbers and beauty salon workers in Dessie City and Kombolcha Town from January 5 to February 10, 2021. The study participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. A structured questionnaire and an observational checklist were used to collect the data. The collected data were entered into EpiData version 4.6 and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. Logistic regression analysis using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models was employed. From the bivariate analysis, variables with p <0.25 were retained into multivariable logistic regression analysis. Finally, from the multivariable analysis, variables that had a p-value < 0.05 were declared as factors significantly associated with good hand hygiene practices. Of the total 410 barbers and beauty salon workers, 52.9% [95% CI: 48.3-57.6] had good hand hygiene practices whereas 47.1% [95% CI: 42.4-51.7] had poor hand hygiene practices. From the total respondents, more than half 250 (61%) were male and 160 (39%) were female, with a mean age of 27.42 ±7.37 years. Out of 410 barbers and beauty salon workers, 73.7% had good knowledge about COVID-19 and 59.5% had a positive attitude towards taking precautions against COVID-19. Female sex (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI:1.29-3.65), educational level of college or above (AOR = 5.53, 95% CI:2.85-10.71), positive attitude towards taking precautions against COVID-19 (AOR = 2.4, 95% CI:1.46-4.17), belief in the effectiveness of hand hygiene practices (AOR = 3.78, 95% CI:2.18-6.55) and presence of a hand-washing facility with soap and water (AOR = 5.55, 95% CI:3.28-9.40) were factors significantly associated with good hand hygiene practices among barbers and beauty salon workers. The proportion of good hand hygiene practice was not sufficient to combat the virus. Good hand hygiene practice was higher among those with higher educational level, positive attitude towards taking precautions against COVID-19, belief in the effectiveness of hand hygiene practices, presence of a hand-washing facility with soap and water and those of female sex. Thus, improving hand hygiene practices through continued training, especially for those with a lower educational level and for male workers, is recommended. Moreover, government and non-government organizations should work together to provide alcohol-based hand sanitizer at a low cost to those barbershops and beauty salons if there is no access to water and soap.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35776735
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269225
pii: PONE-D-21-11050
pmc: PMC9249229
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soaps
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0269225Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jan;49(1):30-33
pubmed: 32818577
BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 15;7:18
pubmed: 17359545
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2017;25(4):339-349
pubmed: 32215245
BMJ. 2009 Sep 21;339:b3675
pubmed: 19773323
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):e0253452
pubmed: 34359068
Environ Health Prev Med. 2015 Sep;20(5):325-31
pubmed: 26002374
Am J Public Health. 2003 Nov;93(11):1887-8
pubmed: 14600058
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 12;16(3):e0247954
pubmed: 33711038
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 27;69(12):343-346
pubmed: 32214079
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29744
pubmed: 22295066
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):514-523
pubmed: 31986261
Nurs Times. 2013 Sep 25-Oct 1;109(38):12-3
pubmed: 24313108
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:139-144
pubmed: 32283285
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;268:113370
pubmed: 32980677
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720943331
pubmed: 32686571
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017 Feb 16;6:23
pubmed: 28239452
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2004 Oct-Dec;16(4):371-6
pubmed: 15712974
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Nov 26;8:190
pubmed: 31788237
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep 1;202(5):651-659
pubmed: 32543913
Cutis. 2020 May;105(5):233-234
pubmed: 32603385
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;17(8):
pubmed: 32331344
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Apr;17(4):447-54
pubmed: 22248114
Research (Wash D C). 2020 Apr 19;2020:2402961
pubmed: 32377638
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Nov;57(11):864-70
pubmed: 14600111
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 09;69(40):1443-1449
pubmed: 33031363
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Dec;58(12):988-96
pubmed: 15547057
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1286-1305
pubmed: 33016518
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1372-81
pubmed: 18556606
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 19;16(4):
pubmed: 30791457
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 10;17(16):
pubmed: 32785004
Trop Med Health. 2020 Aug 20;48:72
pubmed: 32839649
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233668
pubmed: 32437434
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 1;48(3):285-91
pubmed: 19115974
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233744
pubmed: 32437432
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 28;10:222
pubmed: 20663229
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 16;69(41):1485-1491
pubmed: 33056951
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):797-824
pubmed: 20109274
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):2081-2090
pubmed: 32329971
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
J Infect. 2020 Apr;80(4):401-406
pubmed: 32112886
Cell Host Microbe. 2020 Mar 11;27(3):325-328
pubmed: 32035028
Environ Health Perspect. 2020 May;128(5):57005
pubmed: 32438824
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Dec;14(12):1534-41
pubmed: 19793069
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 Jun;227:113512
pubmed: 32220763
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 May;258(5):1135
pubmed: 32222828
Adv Prev Med. 2018 Nov 22;2018:5290797
pubmed: 30595923
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 22;17(22):
pubmed: 33266386
Int J Environ Health Res. 2007 Jun;17(3):161-83
pubmed: 17479381
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;31(3):283-94
pubmed: 20088678
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):934-943
pubmed: 32167524
Cell. 2008 Sep 19;134(6):981-94
pubmed: 18805091
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Mar;11(3):258-67
pubmed: 16553905
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Sep;48(9):1074-1079
pubmed: 32522610
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Mar;49(3):401-402
pubmed: 32818578
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;27(4):379-89
pubmed: 24945613
Epidemics. 2017 Sep;20:1-20
pubmed: 28487207
BMJ. 2009 Jul 02;339:b2651
pubmed: 19574308
Glob Health Action. 2016 Feb 29;9:29207
pubmed: 26950556