The transitions and predictors of cognitive frailty with multi-state Markov model: a cohort study.
Cognitive frailty
Cognitive impairment
Multi-state Markov model
Physical frailty
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2022
01 07 2022
Historique:
received:
09
03
2022
accepted:
13
06
2022
entrez:
1
7
2022
pubmed:
2
7
2022
medline:
7
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cognitive frailty (CF) is characterized by the simultaneous presence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment. Previous studies have investigated its prevalence and impact on different adverse health-related outcomes. Few studies have focused on the progression and reversibility of CF and their potential predictors. Data were derived from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). A total of 4051 older adults with complete data on three waves of the survey (2011, 2013, and 2015) were included and categorized into four groups: normal state (NS), cognitive impairment (CI) only, physical frailty (PF) only and CF (with both PF and CI). A multi-state Markov model was constructed to explore the transitions and predicting factors of CF. The incidence and improvement rates of CF were 1.70 and 11.90 per 100 person-years, respectively. The 1-year transition probability of progression to CF in those with CI was higher than that in the PF population (0.340 vs. 0.054), and those with CF were more likely to move to PF (0.208). Being female [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.46, 95%CI = 1.06, 2.02)], dissatisfied with life (HR = 4.94, 95%CI = 1.04, 23.61), had a history of falls (HR = 2.36, 95%CI = 1.02, 5.51), rural household registration (HR = 2.98, 95%CI = 1.61, 5.48), multimorbidity (HR = 2.17, 95%CI = 1.03, 4.59), and depression (HR = 1.75, 95%CI = 1.26, 2.45) increased the risk of progression to CF, whereas literacy (HR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.33, 0.64) decreased such risk. Depression (HR = 0.43, 95%CI = 0.22, 0.84) reduced the likelihood of CF improvement, whereas literacy (HR = 2.23, 95%CI = 1.63, 3.07) increased such likelihood. Cognitive frailty is a dynamically changing condition in older adults. Possible interventions aimed at preventing the onset and facilitating the recovery of cognitive frailty should focus on improving cognitive function in older adults.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cognitive frailty (CF) is characterized by the simultaneous presence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment. Previous studies have investigated its prevalence and impact on different adverse health-related outcomes. Few studies have focused on the progression and reversibility of CF and their potential predictors.
METHODS
Data were derived from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). A total of 4051 older adults with complete data on three waves of the survey (2011, 2013, and 2015) were included and categorized into four groups: normal state (NS), cognitive impairment (CI) only, physical frailty (PF) only and CF (with both PF and CI). A multi-state Markov model was constructed to explore the transitions and predicting factors of CF.
RESULTS
The incidence and improvement rates of CF were 1.70 and 11.90 per 100 person-years, respectively. The 1-year transition probability of progression to CF in those with CI was higher than that in the PF population (0.340 vs. 0.054), and those with CF were more likely to move to PF (0.208). Being female [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.46, 95%CI = 1.06, 2.02)], dissatisfied with life (HR = 4.94, 95%CI = 1.04, 23.61), had a history of falls (HR = 2.36, 95%CI = 1.02, 5.51), rural household registration (HR = 2.98, 95%CI = 1.61, 5.48), multimorbidity (HR = 2.17, 95%CI = 1.03, 4.59), and depression (HR = 1.75, 95%CI = 1.26, 2.45) increased the risk of progression to CF, whereas literacy (HR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.33, 0.64) decreased such risk. Depression (HR = 0.43, 95%CI = 0.22, 0.84) reduced the likelihood of CF improvement, whereas literacy (HR = 2.23, 95%CI = 1.63, 3.07) increased such likelihood.
CONCLUSIONS
Cognitive frailty is a dynamically changing condition in older adults. Possible interventions aimed at preventing the onset and facilitating the recovery of cognitive frailty should focus on improving cognitive function in older adults.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35778705
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03220-2
pii: 10.1186/s12877-022-03220-2
pmc: PMC9248089
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
550Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Nutr Health Aging. 2013 Sep;17(9):726-34
pubmed: 24154642
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:54-62
pubmed: 24331882
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(4):467-478
pubmed: 33786564
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb 1;185(3):281-5
pubmed: 21960534
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Dec 12;73(1):102-108
pubmed: 28525586
J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(7):729-35
pubmed: 27499306
Ageing Res Rev. 2017 Jul;36:78-87
pubmed: 28366616
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Oct 18;10:295
pubmed: 30405390
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Nov 18;12(22):23129-23145
pubmed: 33221750
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):608
pubmed: 34706663
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):593
pubmed: 34696720
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jul;70(7):716-21
pubmed: 26783304
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Sep 1;74(9):1056-1062
pubmed: 28759663
J Nutr Health Aging. 2013 Sep;17(9):723-5
pubmed: 24154641
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62
pubmed: 23395245
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jan;52(1):123-7
pubmed: 14687326
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;25(11):1236-1248
pubmed: 28689645
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;34(10):1361-1368
pubmed: 31179580
Exp Gerontol. 2016 Mar;75:42-7
pubmed: 26707711
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jul;14(7):518-24
pubmed: 23669054
J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Mar;19(3):250-7
pubmed: 25732208
Lifetime Data Anal. 2008 Dec;14(4):405-31
pubmed: 18791824
J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Mar;19(3):276-83
pubmed: 25732212
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Oct 20;4:174
pubmed: 29104866
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Dec 01;13:774268
pubmed: 34924997
Rejuvenation Res. 2018 Dec;21(6):510-517
pubmed: 29644921
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):392-7
pubmed: 23764209
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Feb;65(2):373-380
pubmed: 27995615
J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(9):952-957
pubmed: 27791226
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Oct 4;74(11):1761-1770
pubmed: 31120105
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 May;17(5):368-75
pubmed: 19390294
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Jul 25;14:1343-1352
pubmed: 31413555
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;20(10):845-53
pubmed: 23011051
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56
pubmed: 11253156
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Dec;16(12):1027-33
pubmed: 26255098
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Jul;19(7):647-653
pubmed: 31083795
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan;15(1):56-64
pubmed: 26597325
Qual Life Res. 2017 May;26(5):1273-1282
pubmed: 27796773
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Feb;16(2):305-315
pubmed: 31606367
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 11;10(12):
pubmed: 33322251
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Mar 1;72(3):369-375
pubmed: 27013397
J Clin Med. 2018 Oct 08;7(10):
pubmed: 30297629
Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Sep;12(4):840-51
pubmed: 23831959
Am J Prev Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;10(2):77-84
pubmed: 8037935
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 28;17(5):
pubmed: 32121194
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2018;5(1):42-48
pubmed: 29405232
JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1303-4
pubmed: 20371790
J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(2):152-160
pubmed: 28112769
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):252-258
pubmed: 27838339
Rejuvenation Res. 2015 Oct;18(5):389-412
pubmed: 25808052
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;43(1):61-8
pubmed: 23243115
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 May;60(5):854-61
pubmed: 22568404