How to analyse and account for interactions in mixture toxicity with toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic models.

Acute toxicity Effect modelling Mixture hazard Survival assay TKTD modelling

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 08 04 2022
revised: 20 06 2022
accepted: 25 06 2022
pubmed: 3 7 2022
medline: 24 8 2022
entrez: 2 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The assessment of chemical mixture toxicity is one of the major challenges in ecotoxicology. Chemicals can interact, leading to more or less effects than expected, commonly named synergism and antagonism respectively. The classic ad hoc approach for the assessment of mixture effects is based on dose-response curves at a single time point, and is limited to identifying a mixture interaction but cannot provide predictions for untested exposure durations, nor for scenarios where exposure varies in time. We here propose a new approach using toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modelling: The General Unified Threshold model of Survival (GUTS) framework, recently extended for mixture toxicity assessment. We designed a dedicated mechanistic interaction module coupled with the GUTS mixture model to i) identify interactions, ii) test hypotheses to identify which chemical is likely responsible for the interaction, and finally iii) simulate and predict the effect of synergistic and antagonistic mixtures. We tested the modelling approach experimentally with two species (Enchytraeus crypticus and Mamestra brassicae) exposed to different potentially synergistic mixtures (composed of: prochloraz, imidacloprid, cypermethrin, azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, and chlorpyrifos). Furthermore, we also tested the model with previously published experimental data on two other species (Bombus terrestris and Daphnia magna) exposed to pesticide mixtures (clothianidin, propiconazole, dimethoate, imidacloprid and thiacloprid) found to be synergistic or antagonistic with the classic approach. The results showed an accurate simulation of synergistic and antagonistic effects for the different tested species and mixtures. This modelling approach can identify interactions accounting for the entire time of exposure, and not only at one time point as in the classic approach, and provides predictions of the mixture effect for untested mixture exposure scenarios, including those with time-variable mixture composition.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35779734
pii: S0048-9697(22)04145-6
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157048
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Insecticides 0
Chlorpyrifos JCS58I644W

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

157048

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Roman Ashauer reports a relationship with Syngenta Crop Protection AG that includes: employment.

Auteurs

Sylvain Bart (S)

Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK; UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK; MO-ECO(2) (Modelling and data analyses for ecology and ecotoxicology), Paris, France. Electronic address: sylvainbart.moeco2@gmail.com.

Stephen Short (S)

UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK; Cardiff School of Biosciences, BIOSI 1, University of Cardiff, P.O. Box 915, Cardiff CF10 3TL, UK.

Tjalling Jager (T)

DEBtox research, Stevensweert, the Netherlands.

Emily J Eagles (EJ)

UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.

Alex Robinson (A)

UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.

Claire Badder (C)

UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK; Cardiff School of Biosciences, BIOSI 1, University of Cardiff, P.O. Box 915, Cardiff CF10 3TL, UK.

Elma Lahive (E)

UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.

David J Spurgeon (DJ)

UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.

Roman Ashauer (R)

Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK; Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH