Chasing perception in domestic cats and dogs.


Journal

Animal cognition
ISSN: 1435-9456
Titre abrégé: Anim Cogn
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9814573

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 24 12 2021
accepted: 01 06 2022
revised: 25 05 2022
pubmed: 4 7 2022
medline: 16 11 2022
entrez: 3 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Chasing motion is often used to study the perception of inanimate objects as animate. When chasing interaction and independent motions between two agents are displayed simultaneously on a screen, we expect observers to quickly perceive and recognise the chasing pattern (because of its familiarity) and turn their attention to the independent motion (novelty effect). In case of isosceles triangles as moving figures, dogs and humans both display this behaviour, but dogs initially preferred to look at the chasing pattern whereas humans started to increase their gaze towards the independent motion earlier. Here, we compared whether family cats perceive moving inanimate objects as animate and whether their looking behaviour is similar to that of small family dogs. We displayed a chasing and independent motion side by side on a screen in two consecutive trials and assessed subjects' looking behaviour towards the motions. Similarly to previous studies, we found that dogs eventually looked longer at the independent motion, but cats preferred to look at the independent motion at the beginning of the video display and only later shifted their attention to the chasing motion. No difference was found in the frequency of gaze alternation of the two species. Thus, although cats discriminate between the chasing and independent motions, it is not clear whether this discrimination is controlled by animate motion cues. The difference may originate from their ecological situation and/or may be explained by specific perceptual mechanisms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35780462
doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01643-3
pii: 10.1007/s10071-022-01643-3
pmc: PMC9652223
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1589-1597

Subventions

Organisme : Office for Supported Research Groups
ID : MTA 01 031
Organisme : Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
ID : TKP2020- IKA-05

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Abdai J, Miklósi Á (2022) Selection for specific behavioural traits does not influence preference of chasing motion and visual strategy in dogs. Sci Rep 12:2370. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06382-6
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06382-6 pubmed: 35149772 pmcid: 8837786
Abdai J, Baño Terencio C, Miklósi Á (2017a) Novel approach to study the perception of animacy in dogs. PLoS ONE 12:e0177010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177010
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177010 pubmed: 28472117 pmcid: 5417633
Abdai J, Ferdinandy B, Baño Terencio C et al (2017b) Perception of animacy in dogs and humans. Biol Lett 13:20170156. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0156
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0156 pubmed: 28659418 pmcid: 5493738
Abdai J, Korcsok B, Korondi P, Miklósi Á (2018) Methodological challenges of the use of robots in ethological research. Anim Behav Cogn 5:326–340. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.05.04.02.2018
doi: 10.26451/abc.05.04.02.2018
Abdai J, Ferdinandy B, Lengyel A, Miklósi Á (2021) Animacy perception in dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans (Homo sapiens): comparison may be perturbed by inherent differences in looking patterns. J Comp Psychol 135:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000250
doi: 10.1037/com0000250 pubmed: 32852965
Berkley MA, Sprague JM (1979) Striate cortex and visual acuity functions in the cat. J Comp Neurol 187:679–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901870404
doi: 10.1002/cne.901870404 pubmed: 489797
Berkley MA, Warmath DS, Tunkl JE (1978) Movement discrimination capacities in the cat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:463–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077472
doi: 10.1037/h0077472 pubmed: 681564
Blake R (1993) Cats perceive biological motion. Psychol Sci 4:54–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00557.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00557.x
Bognár Z, Iotchev IB, Kubinyi E (2018) Sex, skull length, breed, and age predict how dogs look at faces of humans and conspecifics. Anim Cogn 21:447–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1180-4
doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1180-4 pubmed: 29667089 pmcid: 6112419
Bradshaw JWS (2016) Sociality in cats: a comparative review. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 11:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2015.09.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.09.004
Bradshaw JWS, Casey RA, Brown SL (2012) Sensory abilities. In: Bradshaw JWS, Casey RA, Brown SL (eds) The behaviour of the domestic cat, 2nd edn. CABI, Wallingford, pp 16–40
doi: 10.1079/9781845939922.0016
Cecchetti M, Crowley SL, McDonald RA (2021) Drivers and facilitators of hunting behaviour in domestic cats and options for management. Mamm Rev 51:307–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12230
doi: 10.1111/mam.12230
D’Eath RB (1998) Can video images imitate real stimuli in animal behaviour experiments? Biol Rev 73:267–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00031.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00031.x
Di Giorgio E, Lunghi M, Simion F, Vallortigara G (2017) Visual cues of motion that trigger animacy perception at birth: the case of self-propulsion. Dev Sci 20:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12394
doi: 10.1111/desc.12394
Di Giorgio E, Lunghi M, Vallortigara G, Simion F (2021) Newborns’ sensitivity to speed changes as a building block for animacy perception. Sci Rep 11:542. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79451-3
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79451-3 pubmed: 33436701 pmcid: 7803759
Dumas C, Dorais Pagé D (2006) Strategy planning in dogs (Canis familiaris) in a progressive elimination task. Behav Processes 73:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.016
doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.016 pubmed: 16540263
Fleishman LJ, Endler JA (2000) Some comments on visual perception and the use of video playback in animal behavior studies. Acta Ethol 3:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s102110000025
doi: 10.1007/s102110000025
Gácsi M, McGreevy P, Kara E, Miklósi Á (2009) Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs. Behav Brain Funct 5:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-31
doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-31 pubmed: 19630939 pmcid: 2731781
Gao T, Scholl BJ (2011) Chasing vs. stalking: Interrupting the perception of animacy. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:669–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020735
doi: 10.1037/a0020735 pubmed: 21639674
Lõoke M, Kanizsár O, Battaglini L et al (2020) Are dogs good at spotting movement? Velocity thresholds of motion detection in Canis familiaris. Curr Zool 66:699–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/CZ/ZOAA044
doi: 10.1093/CZ/ZOAA044 pubmed: 33391371 pmcid: 7769578
Marshall-Pescini S, Cafazzo S, Virányi Z, Range F (2017) Integrating social ecology in explanations of wolf–dog behavioral differences. Curr Opin Behav Sci 16:80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.002
doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.002
Mascalzoni E, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2010) Innate sensitivity for self-propelled causal agency in newly hatched chicks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:4483–4485. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908792107
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908792107 pubmed: 20160095 pmcid: 2840119
Miklósi Á (2015) The perceptual world of the dog. In: Miklósi Á (ed) Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, London, pp 183–204
Miller PE, Murphy CJ (1995) Vision in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 207:1623–1634
pubmed: 7493905
Park SY, Bacelar CE, Holmqvist K (2020) Dog eye movements are slower than human eye movements. J Eye Mov Res 12:4. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.8.4
doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.8.4
Pasternak T, Merigan WH (1980) Movement detection by cats: invariance with direction and target configuration. J Comp Physiol Psychol 94:943–952. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077806
doi: 10.1037/h0077806 pubmed: 7430476
Rochat P, Morgan R, Carpenter M (1997) Younf infants’ sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cogn Dev 12:537–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90022-8
doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90022-8
Rosa-Salva O, Grassi M, Lorenzi E et al (2016) Spontaneous preference for visual cues of animacy in naïve domestic chicks: the case of speed changes. Cognition 157:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.014
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.014 pubmed: 27592411
Scholl BJ, Tremoulet PD (2000) Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn Sci 4:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0 pubmed: 10904254
Shajid Pyari M, Uccheddu S, Lenkei R, Pongrácz P (2021) Inexperienced but still interested—indoor-only cats are more inclined for predatory play than cats with outdoor access. Appl Anim Behav Sci 241:105373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105373
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105373
Tremoulet PD, Feldman J (2000) Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 29:943–951. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3101
doi: 10.1068/p3101 pubmed: 11145086

Auteurs

Judit Abdai (J)

MTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.

Stefania Uccheddu (S)

MTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.

Márta Gácsi (M)

MTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Ádám Miklósi (Á)

MTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary. adam.miklosi@ttk.elte.hu.
Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. adam.miklosi@ttk.elte.hu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH