Homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) testing in newly diagnosed advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: A Belgian expert opinion.
Journal
Facts, views & vision in ObGyn
ISSN: 2032-0418
Titre abrégé: Facts Views Vis Obgyn
Pays: Belgium
ID NLM: 101578773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
entrez:
5
7
2022
pubmed:
6
7
2022
medline:
6
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ovarian cancer (OC) has a poor prognosis as most patients present with non-specific symptoms and the disease is mostly diagnosed at advanced stages. Approximately 90% of cases are classified as epithelial OC (EOC), a category comprising histologically and molecularly distinct tumours. Identifying reliable biomarkers and employing personalised therapies in OC subgroups is crucial for battling the disease. EOCs are often characterised by homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), frequently caused by inactivation of the breast cancer susceptibility (BRCA) genes. These findings have led to the development of poly- (adenosine diphosphate [ADP])- ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), which are synthetically lethal to HRD tumour cells. Both patients with HRD and non-HRD tumours can benefit from PARPi therapy in the recurrent setting. Moreover, recent phase III trials in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage OC have demonstrated greater clinical benefit from PARPi in treating HRD than non-HRD tumours. These findings offer new opportunities for the use of PARPi as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy based on the presence of HRD. In the current article, we provide recommendations for HRD testing and treatment of patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage EOC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35781107
doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.2.024
pmc: PMC10191713
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
111-120Références
Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):672-705
pubmed: 31046081
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 03;16(3):211
pubmed: 25093514
Lancet. 2017 Oct 28;390(10106):1949-1961
pubmed: 28916367
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):636-648
pubmed: 30948273
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec;375(22):2154-2164
pubmed: 27717299
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2484-96
pubmed: 22204725
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):75-87
pubmed: 27908594
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 27;379(26):2495-2505
pubmed: 30345884
Cancer Discov. 2015 Nov;5(11):1137-54
pubmed: 26463832
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 15;24(4):777-783
pubmed: 29191972
Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1606-1622
pubmed: 33004253
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2391-2402
pubmed: 31562799
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 25;374(8):738-48
pubmed: 26933849
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2403-2415
pubmed: 31562800
Cell. 2012 May 25;149(5):979-93
pubmed: 22608084
Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15
pubmed: 21720365
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020 Oct 8;12(3):227-239
pubmed: 33123697
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jul 1;113(7):917-923
pubmed: 33372675
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;28(22):3570-6
pubmed: 20606085
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2416-2428
pubmed: 31851799
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2473-83
pubmed: 22204724
Trends Cell Biol. 2016 Jan;26(1):52-64
pubmed: 26437586
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017 Oct;18(10):610-621
pubmed: 28676700
Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(9):1060-1066
pubmed: 30318511
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jul;69(4):280-304
pubmed: 31099893
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):333-345
pubmed: 33055011
Ann Oncol. 2022 Mar;33(3):276-287
pubmed: 34861371
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):877-886
pubmed: 32967790