A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the buccal aspect of single implants: 1-year results.
collagen matrix
connective tissue graft
dental implant
single tooth
soft tissue
Journal
Journal of clinical periodontology
ISSN: 1600-051X
Titre abrégé: J Clin Periodontol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
revised:
30
05
2022
received:
20
04
2022
accepted:
26
06
2022
pubmed:
6
7
2022
medline:
11
8
2022
entrez:
5
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare connective tissue graft (CTG) with collagen matrix (CMX) in terms of increase in buccal soft tissue profile (BSP) at 1 year when applied at single implant sites. Patients with a single tooth gap in the anterior maxilla and horizontal mucosa defect were enrolled in a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. All sites had a bucco-palatal bone dimension of at least 6 mm, received a single implant and an immediate implant restoration using a full digital workflow. Sites were randomly allocated to the control (CTG) or test group (CMX) to increase buccal soft tissue thickness. The primary outcome was the increase in BSP at 1 year when compared with the pre-operative situation based on superimposed digital surface models. The changes in BSP over time were registered at a buccal area of interest reaching from 0.5 mm below the soft tissue margin to 4 mm more apical. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported, clinical and aesthetic outcomes. Thirty patients were included per group (control: 50% females, mean age 50.1; test: 53% females, mean age 48.2). The increase in BSP at 1 year was 0.98 mm (98.3% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-1.20) for CTG and 0.57 mm (98.3% CI: 0.34 to 0.79) for CMX. The mean difference of 0.41 mm (98.3% CI: 0.12 to 0.69) in favour of CTG was significant (p < .001). Based on an arbitrarily chosen threshold for success of 0.75 mm increase in BSP, 89.7% of the patients in the control group and 10% of the patients in the test group were successfully treated (odds ratio = 77.90; 95% CI: 13.52 to 448.80; p < .001). Sites treated with CMX demonstrated 0.89 mm (98.3% CI: 0.49 to 1.30) more shrinkage between postop and 1 year than sites treated with CTG. In addition, CMX resulted in significantly more marginal bone loss (0.39 mm; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.74; p = .026) than CTG. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of patients' aesthetic satisfaction (p = .938), probing depth (p = .917), plaque (p = .354), bleeding on probing (p = .783), midfacial recession (p = .915), Pink Esthetic Score (p = .121) and Mucosal Scarring Index (p = .965). CTG remains the gold standard to increase soft tissue thickness at implant sites. Clinicians need to outweigh the benefits of CMX against considerable resorption of the graft. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04210596).
Substances chimiques
Collagen
9007-34-5
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04210596']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
911-921Subventions
Organisme : Osteology Foundation
ID : 18-178
Organisme : Universiteit Gent
ID : BOF.STG.2019.0004.01
Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Bouckaert, E., De Bruyckere, T., Eghbali, A., Younes, F., Wessels, R., & Cosyn, J. (2022). A randomized controlled trial comparing guided bone regeneration to connective tissue graft to re-establish buccal convexity at dental implant sites: Three-year results. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 33, 461-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13906
Cairo, F., Barbato, L., Selvaggi, F., Baielli, M. G., Piattelli, A., & Chambrone, L. (2019). Surgical procedures for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 21(6), 1262-1270. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12861
Cosyn, J., Wessels, R., Garcia Cabeza, R., Ackerman, J., Eeckhout, C., & Christiaens, V. (2021). Soft tissue metric parameters, methods and aesthetic indices in implant dentistry: A critical review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(Suppl. 21), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13756
Cosyn, J., Eeckhout, C., Christiaens, V., Eghbali, A., Vervaeke, S., Younes, F., & De Bruyckere, T. (2021). A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the buccal aspect of single implants: 3-month results. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 48(12), 1502-1515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13560
Couso-Queiruga, E., Stuhr, S., Tattan, M., Chambrone, L., & Avila-Ortiz, G. (2021). Post-extraction dimensional changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 48(1), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13390
De Bruyckere, T., Eghbali, A., Younes, F., De Bruyn, H., & Cosyn, J. (2015). Horizontal stability of connective tissue grafts at the buccal aspect of single implants: A 1-year prospective case series. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42(9), 876-882. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12448
De Bruyckere, T., Cabeza, R. G., Eghbali, A., Younes, F., Cleymaet, R., & Cosyn, J. (2020). A randomized controlled study comparing guided bone regeneration with connective tissue graft to reestablish buccal convexity at implant sites: A 1-year volumetric analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 22(4), 468-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12934
Fürhauser, R., Florescu, D., Benesch, T., Haas, R., Mailath, G., & Watzek, G. (2005). Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: The pink esthetic score. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 16(6), 639-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x
Griffin, T. J., Cheung, W. S., Zavras, A. I., & Damoulis, P. D. (2006). Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. Journal of Periodontology, 77(12), 2070-2079. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050296
Huber, S., Zeltner, M., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Jung, R. E., & Thoma, D. S. (2018). Non-interventional 1-year follow-up study of peri-implant soft tissues following previous soft tissue augmentation and crown insertion in single-tooth gaps. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(4), 504-512. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12865
Lambrechts, T., Doornewaard, R., De Bruyckere, T., Matthijs, L., Deschepper, E., & Cosyn, J. (2021). A multicenter cohort study on the association of the one-abutment one-time concept with marginal bone loss around bone level implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(2), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13689
Naenni, N., Bienz, S. P., Benic, G. I., Jung, R. E., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Thoma, D. S. (2018). Volumetric and linear changes at dental implants following grafting with volume-stable three-dimensional collagen matrices or autogenous connective tissue grafts: 6-month data. Clinical Oral Investigations, 22(3), 1185-1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2210-3
O'Leary, T. J., Drake, R. B., & Naylor, J. E. (1972). The plaque control record. Journal of Periodontology, 43(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38
Raghoebar, G. M., Korfage, A., Meijer, H. J. A., Gareb, B., Vissink, A., & Delli, K. (2021). Linear and profilometric changes of the mucosa following soft tissue augmentation in the zone of aesthetic priority: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(Suppl. 21), 138-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13759
Rojo, E., Stroppa, G., Sanz-Martin, I., Gonzalez-Martín, O., & Nart, J. (2020). Soft tissue stability around dental implants after soft tissue grafting from the lateral palate or the tuberosity area - A randomized controlled clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 47(7), 892-899. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13292
Rothamel, D., Benner, M., Fienitz, T., Happe, A., Kreppel, M., Nickenig, H. J., & Zöller, J. E. (2014). Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices - An experimental study in the rat. Head & Face Medicine, 10, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160x-10-10
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. British Medical Journal, 340, c332. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332
Seibert, J. S. (1983). Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. The Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 4(5), 437-453.
Seyssens, L., De Lat, L., & Cosyn, J. (2021). Immediate implant placement with or without connective tissue graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 48(2), 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13397
Stefanini, M., Tavelli, L., Barootchi, S., Sangiorgi, M., & Zucchelli, G. (2021). Patient-reported outcome measures following soft-tissue grafting at implant sites: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(Suppl. 21), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13767
Tan, W. L., Wong, T. L., Wong, M. C., & Lang, N. P. (2012). A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(Suppl. 5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x
Tavelli, L., Barootchi, S., Avila-Ortiz, G., Urban, I. A., Giannobile, W. V., & Wang, H. L. (2021). Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Periodontology, 92(1), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.19-0716
Thoma, D. S., Villar, C. C., Cochran, D. L., Hämmerle, C. H., & Jung, R. E. (2012). Tissue integration of collagen-based matrices: An experimental study in mice. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(12), 1333-1339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02356.x
Thoma, D. S., Buranawat, B., Hammerle, C. H., Held, U., & Jung, R. E. (2014). Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and in partially edentulous areas: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 41(Suppl. 15), S77-S91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12220
Thoma, D. S., Zeltner, M., Hilbe, M., Hämmerle, C. H., Hüsler, J., & Jung, R. E. (2016). Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 43(10), 874-885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12588
Thoma, D. S., Naenni, N., Benic, G. I., Hämmerle, C. H., & Jung, R. E. (2017). Soft tissue volume augmentation at dental implant sites using a volume stable three-dimensional collagen matrix - histological outcomes of a preclinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 44(2), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12635
Thoma, D. S., Naenni, N., Figuero, E., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Schwarz, F., Jung, R. E., & Sanz-Sánchez, I. (2018). Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(Suppl. 15), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13114
Thoma, D. S., Gasser, T. J. W., Jung, R. E., & Hämmerle, C. H. F. (2020). Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing implant sites augmented with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft: 3-year data after insertion of reconstructions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 47(5), 630-639. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13271
Thoma, D. S., Cosyn, J., Fickl, S., Jensen, S. S., Jung, R. E., Raghoebar, G. M., Rocchietta, I., Roccuzzo, M., Sanz, M., Sanz-Sánchez, I., Scarlat, P., Schou, S., Stefanini, M., Strasding, M., Bertl, K., & Working Group 2 of the 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021. (2021). Soft tissue management at implants: Summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32 Suppl 21(Suppl. 21), 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13798
Vallecillo, C., Toledano-Osorio, M., Vallecillo-Rivas, M., Toledano, M., & Osorio, R. (2021). In vitro biodegradation pattern of collagen matrices for soft tissue augmentation. Polymers, 13(16), 2633. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162633
Wessels, R., De Roose, S., De Bruyckere, T., Eghbali, A., Jacquet, W., De Rouck, T., & Cosyn, J. (2019). The Mucosal Scarring Index: Reliability of a new composite index for assessing scarring following oral surgery. Clinical Oral Investigations, 23(3), 1209-1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2535-6
Windael, S., Collaert, B., De Buyser, S., De Bruyn, H., & Vervaeke, S. (2021). Early peri-implant bone loss as a predictor for peri-implantitis: A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 23(3), 298-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13000
Zeltner, M., Jung, R. E., Hämmerle, C. H., Hüsler, J., & Thoma, D. S. (2017). Randomized controlled clinical study comparing a volume-stable collagen matrix to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: Linear volumetric soft tissue changes up to 3 months. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 44(4), 446-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12697