Right ventricular volume-strain loops using 3D echocardiography-derived mesh models: proof-of-concept application on patients undergoing different types of open-heart surgery.
Three-dimensional echocardiography
cardiac surgery
right ventricle
volume-strain loops
Journal
Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
ISSN: 2223-4292
Titre abrégé: Quant Imaging Med Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101577942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
14
12
2021
accepted:
28
03
2022
entrez:
5
7
2022
pubmed:
6
7
2022
medline:
6
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Right ventricular (RV) function can be quantified by right heart catheterization-derived pressure-volume loops. While this technique is invasive, echocardiography-based volume-strain loops (VSLs) potentially reflect a non-invasive alternative. In this study, an approach to generate VSLs from volume and multidimensional strain data of 3D echocardiography-derived RV mesh models is evaluated with regard to feasibility and reproducibility. In a retrospective cohort study design, 3D intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms of twenty-three patients undergoing aortic valve surgery (AVS) and eighteen patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting were available prior to sternotomy and after sternal closure. RV meshes were generated using 3D speckle-tracking. Custom-made software quantified the meshes' volumes, global longitudinal (RV-GLS) and global circumferential strain (RV-GCS) for VSL generation. Linear regression of systolic VSLs yielded slopes, intercepts and systolic areas. Polynomial regression of two orders was used to analyze systolic-diastolic coupling at 10% increments of the RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV). Reproducibility was analyzed by fourfold double-measurements of four datasets. VSL calculation was feasible from all included 3D datasets. RV-GLS remained unaltered, but RV-GCS worsened in AVS [abs. diff. (∆) 3.9%, P<0.01] and OPCAB patients (∆4.5%, P<0.001). While RV-GCS systolic areas were markedly reduced at the end of AVS (∆268mL%, P<0.01) and OPCAB (∆185mL%, P<0.001), RV-GCS slopes did not change. Systolic-diastolic uncoupling was not observed, but in trend, decreased diastolic RV-GCS after AVS (P=0.06) and increased diastolic RV-GCS after OPCAB (P=0.06) were observed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (0.84-0.98) and coefficients of variation (6.4-11.8%) indicated good reproducibility. RV VSL generation using 3D echocardiography-derived mesh models is feasible. Longitudinal and circumferential strain vectors yield intrinsically different VSL indices. In future investigations, VSLs of multidimensional strains could provide further insight into periprocedural changes of RV mechanics.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Right ventricular (RV) function can be quantified by right heart catheterization-derived pressure-volume loops. While this technique is invasive, echocardiography-based volume-strain loops (VSLs) potentially reflect a non-invasive alternative. In this study, an approach to generate VSLs from volume and multidimensional strain data of 3D echocardiography-derived RV mesh models is evaluated with regard to feasibility and reproducibility.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In a retrospective cohort study design, 3D intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms of twenty-three patients undergoing aortic valve surgery (AVS) and eighteen patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting were available prior to sternotomy and after sternal closure. RV meshes were generated using 3D speckle-tracking. Custom-made software quantified the meshes' volumes, global longitudinal (RV-GLS) and global circumferential strain (RV-GCS) for VSL generation. Linear regression of systolic VSLs yielded slopes, intercepts and systolic areas. Polynomial regression of two orders was used to analyze systolic-diastolic coupling at 10% increments of the RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV). Reproducibility was analyzed by fourfold double-measurements of four datasets.
Results
UNASSIGNED
VSL calculation was feasible from all included 3D datasets. RV-GLS remained unaltered, but RV-GCS worsened in AVS [abs. diff. (∆) 3.9%, P<0.01] and OPCAB patients (∆4.5%, P<0.001). While RV-GCS systolic areas were markedly reduced at the end of AVS (∆268mL%, P<0.01) and OPCAB (∆185mL%, P<0.001), RV-GCS slopes did not change. Systolic-diastolic uncoupling was not observed, but in trend, decreased diastolic RV-GCS after AVS (P=0.06) and increased diastolic RV-GCS after OPCAB (P=0.06) were observed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (0.84-0.98) and coefficients of variation (6.4-11.8%) indicated good reproducibility.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
RV VSL generation using 3D echocardiography-derived mesh models is feasible. Longitudinal and circumferential strain vectors yield intrinsically different VSL indices. In future investigations, VSLs of multidimensional strains could provide further insight into periprocedural changes of RV mechanics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35782265
doi: 10.21037/qims-21-1204
pii: qims-12-07-3679
pmc: PMC9246735
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3679-3691Informations de copyright
2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-21-1204/coif). MK and HM report that they have a patent pending on right ventricular 3D mesh-derived volume-strain loop generation. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Eur Respir J. 2013 Jun;41(6):1419-23
pubmed: 23314901
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021 Apr;34(4):447-449
pubmed: 33340687
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011 Sep;12(9):656-64
pubmed: 21810828
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec;34(12):1905-1915
pubmed: 30073630
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan;11(1):e006894
pubmed: 29321212
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;35(12):2177-2188
pubmed: 31321655
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Nov 1;24(5):1189-94
pubmed: 7930238
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Oct;11(9):732-7
pubmed: 20421229
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Jun;33(6):1527-1532
pubmed: 30867108
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Mar;34(3):708-718
pubmed: 31540753
Cardiol Rev. 2020 Jan/Feb;28(1):36-41
pubmed: 31804291
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726
pubmed: 34447992
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jun;35(6):1628-1637
pubmed: 33582011
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt B):1286-1288
pubmed: 28823749
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Nov;113(5):815-21
pubmed: 25005721
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan 22;22(2):188-195
pubmed: 32632438
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Sep;106(9):734-742
pubmed: 28409231
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 8;64(1):41-51
pubmed: 24998127
Acta Radiol. 2020 Jul;61(7):894-902
pubmed: 31752497
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):199
pubmed: 31684877
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022 Apr;35(4):408-418
pubmed: 34793944
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2020 Aug 12;18(1):32
pubmed: 32787878
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):
pubmed: 28174197
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):966-71
pubmed: 26130077
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;272:348-355
pubmed: 29903518
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Aug;33(8):985-994.e1
pubmed: 32532643
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;12(11 Pt 1):2155-2164
pubmed: 30878422
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan 22;22(2):142-152
pubmed: 33184656
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Aug;32(8):1199-211
pubmed: 27209282
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):
pubmed: 28588092
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Oct;31(5):1656-1662
pubmed: 28416392
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Aug;32(8):777-83
pubmed: 23773508
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;159(4):1430-1438.e4
pubmed: 31133354
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):1246-1256
pubmed: 32220010
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Aug;33(8):995-1005.e1
pubmed: 32620323
Circulation. 2018 May 15;137(20):e578-e622
pubmed: 29650544