An Analysis of Lower Limb Coordination Variability in Unilateral Tasks in Healthy Adults: A Possible Prognostic Tool.
continuous hops
interlimb coordination
interlimb coordination variability
unilateral functional tasks
unilateral sit to stand
Journal
Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology
ISSN: 2296-4185
Titre abrégé: Front Bioeng Biotechnol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101632513
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
28
02
2022
accepted:
23
05
2022
entrez:
5
7
2022
pubmed:
6
7
2022
medline:
6
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Interlimb coordination variability analysis can shed light into the dynamics of higher order coordination and motor control. However, it is not clear how the interlimb coordination of people with no known injuries change in similar activities with increasing difficulty. This study aimed to ascertain if the interlimb coordination variability range and patterns of healthy participants change in different unilateral functional tasks with increasing complexity and whether leg dominance affects the interlimb coordination variability. In this cross-sectional study fourteen younger participants with no known injuries completed three repeated unilateral sit-to-stands (UniSTS), step-ups (SUs), and continuous-hops (Hops). Using four inertial sensors mounted on the lower legs and thighs, angular rotation of thighs and shanks were recorded. Using Hilbert transform, the phase angle of each segment and then the continuous relative phase (CRP) of the two segments were measured. The CRP is indicative of the interlimb coordination. Finally, the linear and the nonlinear shank-thigh coordination variability of each participant in each task was calculated. The results show that the linear shank-thigh coordination variability was significantly smaller in the SUs compared to both UniSTS and Hops in both legs. There were no significant differences found between the latter two tests in their linear coordination variability. However, Hops were found to have significantly larger nonlinear shank-thigh coordination variability compared to the SUs and the UniSTS. This can be due to larger vertical and horizontal forces required for the task and can reveal inadequate motor control during the movement. The combination of nonlinear and linear interlimb coordination variability can provide more insight into human movement as they measure different aspects of coordination variability. It was also seen that leg dominance does not affect the lower limb coordination variability in participants with no known injuries. The results should be tested in participants recovering from lower limb injuries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35782503
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.885329
pii: 885329
pmc: PMC9247147
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
885329Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Ghahramani, Mason, Pearsall and Spratford.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147300
pubmed: 26807858
Gait Posture. 2020 Mar;77:36-42
pubmed: 31972473
J Biomech. 2021 Oct 11;127:110680
pubmed: 34418864
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Oct;69:159-65
pubmed: 27506266
J Biomech. 2014 Mar 21;47(5):1020-6
pubmed: 24485511
Gait Posture. 2019 May;70:156-161
pubmed: 30875602
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Jul 17;7:173
pubmed: 31380364
J Sports Sci. 2018 Oct;36(19):2164-2171
pubmed: 29471731
Sports Med. 2009;39(1):15-28
pubmed: 19093693
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Oct;58:90-95
pubmed: 30064042
Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012 Nov 27;4(1):45
pubmed: 23186012
Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:505-509
pubmed: 29679922
J Orthop Res. 1994 Nov;12(6):769-79
pubmed: 7983552
J Mot Behav. 2004 Mar;36(1):104-14
pubmed: 14766493
Gait Posture. 2018 Feb;60:111-115
pubmed: 29179051
Motor Control. 2020 Jan 1;24(1):168-188
pubmed: 31525730
J Biomech. 2012 Jan 10;45(2):275-80
pubmed: 22078272
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Jun 5;66:449-458
pubmed: 31176256
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Nov;27(11):1328-1336
pubmed: 27747935
Gait Posture. 2021 Jan;83:160-166
pubmed: 33152611
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Jan 23;6:2
pubmed: 19166605
Entropy (Basel). 2019 May 28;21(6):
pubmed: 33267255
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 Mar;16(3):213-21
pubmed: 11240056
Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:191-196
pubmed: 32781369
Sports Med. 2013 Mar;43(3):167-78
pubmed: 23329604
Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Oct;30(5):869-88
pubmed: 21802756
Age Ageing. 2010 Jan;39(1):99-104
pubmed: 20015855
Gait Posture. 2019 Jan;67:1-8
pubmed: 30245239
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Jun;41:102053
pubmed: 32203931
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 Sep;30(3):120-9
pubmed: 17029655
J Orthop Res. 2017 Jun;35(6):1304-1310
pubmed: 27474886
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Aug;26(7):741-8
pubmed: 21514018
J Sport Health Sci. 2016 Mar;5(1):3-13
pubmed: 30356938
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2018 Aug 22;10:15
pubmed: 30167308
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019 Apr;57(4):759-764
pubmed: 30392162
Front Robot AI. 2020 Feb 11;7:13
pubmed: 33501182
Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:109-115
pubmed: 32707402
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 28;8:620805
pubmed: 33585418
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 May;15(3):388-394
pubmed: 32566375
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Jun;46:21-27
pubmed: 30878649
J Sports Sci. 2016;34(4):289-302
pubmed: 26055387
Sports Biomech. 2013 Jun;12(2):69-92
pubmed: 23898682
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Nov;24(11):3140-3
pubmed: 20940645
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 May;29(5):484-93
pubmed: 24726779