Maternal Perceptions About Sensory Interventions in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.

NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) development qualitative study sensory therapy

Journal

Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 26 02 2022
accepted: 10 05 2022
entrez: 5 7 2022
pubmed: 6 7 2022
medline: 6 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mothers play an important role in providing positive sensory experiences to their infants during NICU hospitalization. However, little is known regarding maternal perceptions about sensory-based interventions in the NICU. Further, understanding maternal perceptions was an important part of the process during development of the Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE) program. Twenty mothers of very preterm infants were interviewed after NICU discharge and asked open-ended questions about sensory-based interventions they performed in the NICU and probed about their perceptions related to the development of a sensory-based guideline and the use of volunteers to provide sensory-based interventions when unable to be present in the NICU. Interviews were transcribed and uploaded into NVivoV.12 for content analysis. Mothers reported that kangaroo care was a common sensory intervention they performed in the NICU. Of the 18 mothers who commented on the development of a sensory-based guideline, 17 (94%) said they would be accepting of one. Among 19 mothers, 18 (95%) supported volunteers conducting sensory-based interventions in their absence. Identified themes included: 1) Perceptions about development of a sensory-based guideline, 2) Perceptions of interactions with healthcare providers, 3) Maternal participation in sensory interventions, 4) Maternal experience, and 5) Emotions from mothers. Maternal perceptions regarding the development of a sensory-based guideline were favorable, and the SENSE program has since been finalized after incorporating important insights learned from stakeholders in this study. Mothers' perceptions were tied to their NICU experiences, which elicited strong emotions. These findings highlight important considerations when developing family-centered interventions.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Mothers play an important role in providing positive sensory experiences to their infants during NICU hospitalization. However, little is known regarding maternal perceptions about sensory-based interventions in the NICU. Further, understanding maternal perceptions was an important part of the process during development of the Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE) program.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Twenty mothers of very preterm infants were interviewed after NICU discharge and asked open-ended questions about sensory-based interventions they performed in the NICU and probed about their perceptions related to the development of a sensory-based guideline and the use of volunteers to provide sensory-based interventions when unable to be present in the NICU. Interviews were transcribed and uploaded into NVivoV.12 for content analysis.
Results UNASSIGNED
Mothers reported that kangaroo care was a common sensory intervention they performed in the NICU. Of the 18 mothers who commented on the development of a sensory-based guideline, 17 (94%) said they would be accepting of one. Among 19 mothers, 18 (95%) supported volunteers conducting sensory-based interventions in their absence. Identified themes included: 1) Perceptions about development of a sensory-based guideline, 2) Perceptions of interactions with healthcare providers, 3) Maternal participation in sensory interventions, 4) Maternal experience, and 5) Emotions from mothers.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Maternal perceptions regarding the development of a sensory-based guideline were favorable, and the SENSE program has since been finalized after incorporating important insights learned from stakeholders in this study. Mothers' perceptions were tied to their NICU experiences, which elicited strong emotions. These findings highlight important considerations when developing family-centered interventions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35783324
doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.884329
pmc: PMC9240393
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

884329

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Lisle, Buma, Smith, Richter, Satpute and Pineda.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

RP and JS are authors of the SENSE Program. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Pediatr. 2017 Apr;183:56-66.e3
pubmed: 28189301
J Perinatol. 2013 Apr;33(4):278-81
pubmed: 22899183
Acta Paediatr. 2018 Mar;107(3):414-424
pubmed: 29059481
Eur J Pain. 2008 May;12(4):464-71
pubmed: 17869557
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012 Nov-Dec;41(6):786-97
pubmed: 22789154
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Oct;25(19-20):2745-56
pubmed: 27256250
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Oct;36(12):1229-1236
pubmed: 30577058
J Perinatol. 2017 Apr;37(4):323-332
pubmed: 27763631
Curr Treat Options Pediatr. 2018 Mar;4(1):49-69
pubmed: 29881666
Early Hum Dev. 2019 Jun;133:29-35
pubmed: 31054467
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;33(4):421-7
pubmed: 15346667
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Apr-Jun;22(2):133-44; quiz 145-6
pubmed: 18496073
Acta Paediatr. 2012 Oct;101(10):1032-7
pubmed: 22812674
J Perinatol. 1992 Jun;12(2):164-72
pubmed: 1522437
Early Hum Dev. 2019 Dec;139:104838
pubmed: 31471000
Adv Neonatal Care. 2017 Apr;17(2):131-138
pubmed: 27759567
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Jul;103(4):F343-F348
pubmed: 28970318
Front Pediatr. 2020 May 06;8:222
pubmed: 32435628
J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;177:84-89
pubmed: 27470693
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017 Jan;52(1):84-90
pubmed: 27362468
J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;205:98-104.e4
pubmed: 30291021
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Sep 13;14:230
pubmed: 25216714
Early Hum Dev. 2018 Feb;117:32-38
pubmed: 29275070
Early Hum Dev. 2019 Dec;139:104840
pubmed: 31445697
Trends Neurosci. 2011 Apr;34(4):177-87
pubmed: 21397343
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Jul/Sep;31(3):263-273
pubmed: 28234668
CMAJ. 2014 Aug 5;186(11):845-7
pubmed: 24710910
J Perinatol. 2013 Aug;33(8):636-41
pubmed: 23412640
J Perinatol. 2012 Jul;32(7):545-51
pubmed: 22031044
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;17(10):957-967
pubmed: 27518584
Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Oct;11(5):312-8; quiz pg 319-20
pubmed: 22123399

Auteurs

Julia Lisle (J)

Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Kylie Buma (K)

Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Joan Smith (J)

Department of Quality, Safety and Practice Excellence St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Marinthea Richter (M)

Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Prutha Satpute (P)

Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Roberta Pineda (R)

Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Classifications MeSH