Demographic and clinical characteristics of confirmed human monkeypox virus cases in individuals attending a sexual health centre in London, UK: an observational analysis.
Journal
The Lancet. Infectious diseases
ISSN: 1474-4457
Titre abrégé: Lancet Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
31
05
2022
revised:
14
06
2022
accepted:
14
06
2022
pubmed:
6
7
2022
medline:
31
8
2022
entrez:
5
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Historically, human monkeypox virus cases in the UK have been limited to imported infections from west Africa. Currently, the UK and several other countries are reporting a rapid increase in monkeypox cases among individuals attending sexual health clinics, with no apparent epidemiological links to endemic areas. We describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with human monkeypox virus attending a sexual health centre. In this observational analysis, we considered patients with confirmed monkeypox virus infection via PCR detection attending open-access sexual health clinics in London, UK, between May 14 and May 25, 2022. We report hospital admissions and concurrent sexually transmitted infection (STI) proportions, and describe our local response within the first 2 weeks of the outbreak. Monkeypox virus infection was confirmed in 54 individuals, all identifying as men who have sex with men (MSM), with a median age of 41 years (IQR 34-45). 38 (70%) of 54 individuals were White, 26 (48%) were born in the UK, and 13 (24%) were living with HIV. 36 (67%) of 54 individuals reported fatigue or lethargy, 31 (57%) reported fever, and ten (18%) had no prodromal symptoms. All patients presented with skin lesions, of which 51 (94%) were anogenital. 37 (89%) of 54 individuals had skin lesions affecting more than one anatomical site and four (7%) had oropharyngeal lesions. 30 (55%) of 54 individuals had lymphadenopathy. One in four patients had a concurrent STI. Five (9%) of 54 individuals required admission to hospital, mainly due to pain or localised bacterial cellulitis requiring antibiotic intervention or analgesia. We recorded no fatal outcomes. Autochthonous community monkeypox virus transmission is currently observed among MSM in the UK. We found a high proportion of concomitant STIs and frequent anogenital symptoms, suggesting transmissibility through local inoculation during close skin-to-skin or mucosal contact, during sexual activity. Additional resources are required to support sexual health and other specialist services in managing this condition. A review of the case definition and better understanding of viral transmission routes are needed to shape infection control policies, education and prevention strategies, and contact tracing. None.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Historically, human monkeypox virus cases in the UK have been limited to imported infections from west Africa. Currently, the UK and several other countries are reporting a rapid increase in monkeypox cases among individuals attending sexual health clinics, with no apparent epidemiological links to endemic areas. We describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with human monkeypox virus attending a sexual health centre.
METHODS
In this observational analysis, we considered patients with confirmed monkeypox virus infection via PCR detection attending open-access sexual health clinics in London, UK, between May 14 and May 25, 2022. We report hospital admissions and concurrent sexually transmitted infection (STI) proportions, and describe our local response within the first 2 weeks of the outbreak.
FINDINGS
Monkeypox virus infection was confirmed in 54 individuals, all identifying as men who have sex with men (MSM), with a median age of 41 years (IQR 34-45). 38 (70%) of 54 individuals were White, 26 (48%) were born in the UK, and 13 (24%) were living with HIV. 36 (67%) of 54 individuals reported fatigue or lethargy, 31 (57%) reported fever, and ten (18%) had no prodromal symptoms. All patients presented with skin lesions, of which 51 (94%) were anogenital. 37 (89%) of 54 individuals had skin lesions affecting more than one anatomical site and four (7%) had oropharyngeal lesions. 30 (55%) of 54 individuals had lymphadenopathy. One in four patients had a concurrent STI. Five (9%) of 54 individuals required admission to hospital, mainly due to pain or localised bacterial cellulitis requiring antibiotic intervention or analgesia. We recorded no fatal outcomes.
INTERPRETATION
Autochthonous community monkeypox virus transmission is currently observed among MSM in the UK. We found a high proportion of concomitant STIs and frequent anogenital symptoms, suggesting transmissibility through local inoculation during close skin-to-skin or mucosal contact, during sexual activity. Additional resources are required to support sexual health and other specialist services in managing this condition. A review of the case definition and better understanding of viral transmission routes are needed to shape infection control policies, education and prevention strategies, and contact tracing.
FUNDING
None.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35785793
pii: S1473-3099(22)00411-X
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00411-X
pmc: PMC9534773
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1321-1328Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests LSPM has consulted for or received speaker fees from bioMerieux, DNAelectronics, Eumedica, Dairy Crest, Pfizer, Profile Pharma, Umovis Lab, Kent Pharma, Pulmocide, Sumiovant, and Shionogi, and received research grants from the National Institute for Health Research, CW+ charity, and LifeArc. NG has consulted for or received speaker fees from Viiv Healthcare. JH has received a research grant from the CW+ charity. DA has consulted for or received speaker fees from Viiv Healthcare and Theratechnologies. BM-P has consulted for or received speaker fees from MSD. NM has consulted for or received speaker fees from Pfizer and Shionogi. MBo has consulted for or received speaker fees from Viiv Healthcare, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Cypla, Mylan, and Janssen. MBo has also received research grants from Gilead, Viiv Healthcare, Mylan, Novavax, Janssen, Valneva, Moderna, and Roche. RJ has consulted for or received speaker fees from Viiv Healthcare and Gilead. GW has consulted for or received speaker fees from Viiv Healthcare and Gilead. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
J Infect Dis. 2006 Sep 15;194(6):773-80
pubmed: 16941343
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;26(4):782-785
pubmed: 32023204
J Infect. 2022 Sep;85(3):334-363
pubmed: 35659548
Euro Surveill. 2022 Jun;27(22):
pubmed: 35656830
J Virol Methods. 2010 Oct;169(1):223-7
pubmed: 20643162
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Dec 15;41(12):1742-51
pubmed: 16288398
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;22(8):1153-1162
pubmed: 35623380
Euro Surveill. 2022 Jun;27(23):
pubmed: 35686566
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 22;350(4):342-50
pubmed: 14736926
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Oct;16(10):1539-45
pubmed: 20875278
Euro Surveill. 2022 Jun;27(22):
pubmed: 35656834
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Aug;19(8):872-879
pubmed: 31285143
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 5;71(8):e210-e214
pubmed: 32052029
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 16;13(10):e0007791
pubmed: 31618206
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Feb 11;16(2):e0010141
pubmed: 35148313