Global metabolic alterations in colorectal cancer cells during irinotecan-induced DNA replication stress.
Adaptation
Colorectal cancer
Glucose
Irinotecan
Metabolism
Warburg effect
p53
Journal
Cancer & metabolism
ISSN: 2049-3002
Titre abrégé: Cancer Metab
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101607582
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jul 2022
04 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
11
01
2022
accepted:
09
06
2022
entrez:
5
7
2022
pubmed:
6
7
2022
medline:
6
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Metabolic adaptations can allow cancer cells to survive DNA-damaging chemotherapy. This unmet clinical challenge is a potential vulnerability of cancer. Accordingly, there is an intense search for mechanisms that modulate cell metabolism during anti-tumor therapy. We set out to define how colorectal cancer CRC cells alter their metabolism upon DNA replication stress and whether this provides opportunities to eliminate such cells more efficiently. We incubated p53-positive and p53-negative permanent CRC cells and short-term cultured primary CRC cells with the topoisomerase-1 inhibitor irinotecan and other drugs that cause DNA replication stress and consequently DNA damage. We analyzed pro-apoptotic mitochondrial membrane depolarization and cell death with flow cytometry. We evaluated cellular metabolism with immunoblotting of electron transport chain (ETC) complex subunits, analysis of mitochondrial mRNA expression by qPCR, MTT assay, measurements of oxygen consumption and reactive oxygen species (ROS), and metabolic flux analysis with the Seahorse platform. Global metabolic alterations were assessed using targeted mass spectrometric analysis of extra- and intracellular metabolites. Chemotherapeutics that cause DNA replication stress induce metabolic changes in p53-positive and p53-negative CRC cells. Irinotecan enhances glycolysis, oxygen consumption, mitochondrial ETC activation, and ROS production in CRC cells. This is connected to increased levels of electron transport chain complexes involving mitochondrial translation. Mass spectrometric analysis reveals global metabolic adaptations of CRC cells to irinotecan, including the glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and pentose phosphate pathways. P53-proficient CRC cells, however, have a more active metabolism upon DNA replication stress than their p53-deficient counterparts. This metabolic switch is a vulnerability of p53-positive cells to irinotecan-induced apoptosis under glucose-restricted conditions. Drugs that cause DNA replication stress increase the metabolism of CRC cells. Glucose restriction might improve the effectiveness of classical chemotherapy against p53-positive CRC cells. The topoisomerase-1 inhibitor irinotecan and other chemotherapeutics that cause DNA damage induce metabolic adaptations in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells irrespective of their p53 status. Irinotecan enhances the glycolysis and oxygen consumption in CRC cells to deliver energy and biomolecules necessary for DNA repair and their survival. Compared to p53-deficient cells, p53-proficient CRC cells have a more active metabolism and use their intracellular metabolites more extensively. This metabolic switch creates a vulnerability to chemotherapy under glucose-restricted conditions for p53-positive cells.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Metabolic adaptations can allow cancer cells to survive DNA-damaging chemotherapy. This unmet clinical challenge is a potential vulnerability of cancer. Accordingly, there is an intense search for mechanisms that modulate cell metabolism during anti-tumor therapy. We set out to define how colorectal cancer CRC cells alter their metabolism upon DNA replication stress and whether this provides opportunities to eliminate such cells more efficiently.
METHODS
METHODS
We incubated p53-positive and p53-negative permanent CRC cells and short-term cultured primary CRC cells with the topoisomerase-1 inhibitor irinotecan and other drugs that cause DNA replication stress and consequently DNA damage. We analyzed pro-apoptotic mitochondrial membrane depolarization and cell death with flow cytometry. We evaluated cellular metabolism with immunoblotting of electron transport chain (ETC) complex subunits, analysis of mitochondrial mRNA expression by qPCR, MTT assay, measurements of oxygen consumption and reactive oxygen species (ROS), and metabolic flux analysis with the Seahorse platform. Global metabolic alterations were assessed using targeted mass spectrometric analysis of extra- and intracellular metabolites.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Chemotherapeutics that cause DNA replication stress induce metabolic changes in p53-positive and p53-negative CRC cells. Irinotecan enhances glycolysis, oxygen consumption, mitochondrial ETC activation, and ROS production in CRC cells. This is connected to increased levels of electron transport chain complexes involving mitochondrial translation. Mass spectrometric analysis reveals global metabolic adaptations of CRC cells to irinotecan, including the glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and pentose phosphate pathways. P53-proficient CRC cells, however, have a more active metabolism upon DNA replication stress than their p53-deficient counterparts. This metabolic switch is a vulnerability of p53-positive cells to irinotecan-induced apoptosis under glucose-restricted conditions.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Drugs that cause DNA replication stress increase the metabolism of CRC cells. Glucose restriction might improve the effectiveness of classical chemotherapy against p53-positive CRC cells. The topoisomerase-1 inhibitor irinotecan and other chemotherapeutics that cause DNA damage induce metabolic adaptations in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells irrespective of their p53 status. Irinotecan enhances the glycolysis and oxygen consumption in CRC cells to deliver energy and biomolecules necessary for DNA repair and their survival. Compared to p53-deficient cells, p53-proficient CRC cells have a more active metabolism and use their intracellular metabolites more extensively. This metabolic switch creates a vulnerability to chemotherapy under glucose-restricted conditions for p53-positive cells.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35787728
doi: 10.1186/s40170-022-00286-9
pii: 10.1186/s40170-022-00286-9
pmc: PMC9251592
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
10Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Pharmacol Res. 2019 Oct;148:104398
pubmed: 31415916
J Proteome Res. 2017 Aug 4;16(8):3009-3018
pubmed: 28650662
J Cell Sci. 2007 Dec 1;120(Pt 23):4155-66
pubmed: 18032788
Cell Metab. 2016 Oct 11;24(4):566-581
pubmed: 27732836
Cell Rep. 2014 May 22;7(4):1248-58
pubmed: 24813884
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Nov;18(11):707-719
pubmed: 30327499
J Mol Med (Berl). 2011 Mar;89(3):237-45
pubmed: 21340684
Cancer Cell. 2011 Nov 15;20(5):674-88
pubmed: 22094260
Chem Biol. 2010 May 28;17(5):421-33
pubmed: 20534341
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 29;12(7):
pubmed: 32610612
Nature. 2013 Jan 24;493(7433):542-6
pubmed: 23242140
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1510:23-45
pubmed: 27761811
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016 Sep;15(9):2924-38
pubmed: 27340238
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr 25;20(8):
pubmed: 31027213
Front Oncol. 2018 Feb 05;8:15
pubmed: 29459886
Biomolecules. 2020 Oct 09;10(10):
pubmed: 33050144
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52485
pubmed: 23300683
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Dec;12(12):931-47
pubmed: 24287781
Commun Biol. 2020 May 29;3(1):271
pubmed: 32472013
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Front Mol Biosci. 2016 Aug 22;3:43
pubmed: 27597947
Cancer Metab. 2015 Jan 25;3(1):1
pubmed: 25621173
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jun 1;24(11):2482-2490
pubmed: 29420223
J Biosci. 2020;45:
pubmed: 32661211
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 24;8(1):1531
pubmed: 29367754
Mol Oncol. 2021 Dec;15(12):3404-3429
pubmed: 34258881
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 21;21(43):12234-48
pubmed: 26604633
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;748:237-64
pubmed: 22729861
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2017 Aug;1858(8):686-699
pubmed: 28161329
Biomolecules. 2021 Dec 04;11(12):
pubmed: 34944475
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 15;25(22):6581-6589
pubmed: 31227499
Biochemistry. 2008 Oct 28;47(43):11196-203
pubmed: 18826252
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Apr;1837(4):418-26
pubmed: 24183696
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 06;10:281
pubmed: 32211323
Bioessays. 2016 Jun;38(6):556-67
pubmed: 27171124
Essays Biochem. 2018 Jul 20;62(3):255-270
pubmed: 30030361
Science. 2009 Sep 18;325(5947):1555-9
pubmed: 19661383
Mol Ther. 2013 Jan;21(1):42-8
pubmed: 23011031
Cell Metab. 2018 May 01;27(5):1007-1025.e5
pubmed: 29657030
Biomolecules. 2017 Feb 21;7(1):
pubmed: 28230817
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2016;207:241-66
pubmed: 27557543
Cancer Metab. 2021 Nov 8;9(1):39
pubmed: 34749809
J Cell Biol. 2018 Jul 2;217(7):2291-2298
pubmed: 29915025
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 Apr;2(4):a001040
pubmed: 20452943
Cell Metab. 2020 Sep 1;32(3):391-403.e6
pubmed: 32763164
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 04;22(5):
pubmed: 33806610
Cell Rep. 2019 Jul 30;28(5):1136-1143.e4
pubmed: 31365859
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Jun;1807(6):568-76
pubmed: 20804724
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 19;7(29):44879-44905
pubmed: 27270647
Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):2537-2548
pubmed: 32594310
Mitochondrion. 2021 Sep;60:234-244
pubmed: 34500116
BMC Med. 2017 May 24;15(1):106
pubmed: 28539118
Cancer Cell. 2019 Feb 11;35(2):191-203.e8
pubmed: 30712844
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 09;11:365
pubmed: 32582032
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 21;21(17):
pubmed: 32825551
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1601:1-17
pubmed: 28470513
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Apr 30;12(5):
pubmed: 32365833
Electrophoresis. 2009 Jun;30(12):2182-92
pubmed: 19582719
Cell Biosci. 2013 Feb 06;3(1):9
pubmed: 23388203
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 May;11(5):325-37
pubmed: 21508971
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;12(8):
pubmed: 32806533
Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Oct;16(10):619-34
pubmed: 27492215
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Jan;1845(1):84-9
pubmed: 24361676
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 May;70(3):145-164
pubmed: 32133645
Cancer Lett. 2015 Jan 28;356(2 Pt A):156-64
pubmed: 24732809
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 01;13(7):
pubmed: 33915900
Chin J Cancer. 2011 Aug;30(8):526-39
pubmed: 21801601
Br J Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;173(5):804-14
pubmed: 26332723
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 29;21(1):
pubmed: 31905745
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 01;21(23):
pubmed: 33271979
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016 May;17(5):308-21
pubmed: 26956196