First-Onset Dacryocystitis: Characterization, Treatment, and Prognosis.

Dacryocystorhinostomy First-onset dacryocystitis Nasolacrimal duct obstruction Retrospective study

Journal

Ophthalmology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8245
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101634502

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 02 05 2022
accepted: 20 06 2022
pubmed: 6 7 2022
medline: 6 7 2022
entrez: 5 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the risk of recurrent dacryocystitis after first-onset dacryocystitis and to obtain a demographic profile and treatment characteristic for patients with first-onset dacryocystitis. A retrospective study was performed on patients who had first-onset dacryocystitis during the years 2010-2013. Patients were followed up for 3 years. The analysis focused on the recurrence of dacryocystitis, demographics, medical treatment, and choice of lacrimal surgery. The inclusion criteria were met by 52 patients. Of these 15 (29%) had one or more recurrence of dacryocystitis, and 18 patients (34.6%) underwent lacrimal surgery. The mean age was 51.6 years (median 55.5, range 0-93). The female-to-male ratio was slightly under 3:1 (73.1%). The most frequent medical treatment was flucloxacillin capsules combined with chloramphenicol eye drops or ointment. The majority of patients with first-onset dacryocystitis had no further episodes of dacryocystitis. Some patients experienced recurrent and complicated infections requiring surgery and were thus a significant burden on the healthcare services. Various surgical options were used to clear the nasolacrimal obstruction causing dacryocystitis. Dacryocystorhinostomy was the most common procedure and showed excellent success rate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35788550
doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00544-5
pii: 10.1007/s40123-022-00544-5
pmc: PMC9437150
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1735-1741

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;23(4):302-6
pubmed: 17667103
Semin Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;30(2):118-23
pubmed: 24171807
Ophthalmology. 1995 Jul;102(7):1065-70
pubmed: 9121754
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 May;38(4):418-26
pubmed: 20665987
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;98(4):396-399
pubmed: 31580002
Ophthalmology. 2003 Jan;110(1):78-84
pubmed: 12511350
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;87(1):43-7
pubmed: 12488261
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017 Mar-Apr;6(2):173-178
pubmed: 28399337
Orbit. 2017 Dec;36(6):419-421
pubmed: 28816565
Orbit. 2014 Apr;33(2):81-90
pubmed: 24354575
Eye (Lond). 2008 Jul;22(7):953-60
pubmed: 17603466
Orbit. 2014 Jun;33(3):199-201
pubmed: 24568662
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov-Dec;28(6):389-92
pubmed: 23034682
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Jun;124(6):703-6
pubmed: 9639483
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:649-66
pubmed: 18427633
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 May;21(3):207-10
pubmed: 15942496
Eye (Lond). 2003 Jul;17(5):599-606
pubmed: 12855966

Auteurs

Karl Engelsberg (K)

Department of Ophthalmology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Ögonklinik B, Klinikgatan 18, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. karl.engelsberg@med.lu.se.

Mikael Sadlon (M)

Department of Ophthalmology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Ögonklinik B, Klinikgatan 18, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH