Prerequisites for the clinical implementation of a markerless SGRT-only workflow for the treatment of breast cancer patients.
Breast neoplasms
Interfraction motion management
Intrafraction motion management
Markerless radiation therapy
Surface-guided radiation therapy
Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
received:
22
02
2022
accepted:
23
05
2022
pubmed:
6
7
2022
medline:
18
1
2023
entrez:
5
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A markerless workflow for the treatment of breast cancer patients has been introduced and evaluated retrospectively. It includes surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT)-only positioning for patients with small cone beam CT (CBCT) position corrections during the first five fractions. Prerequisites and the frequency of its clinical application were evaluated, as well as potential benefits in terms of treatment time and dose savings, the frequency of CBCT scans, and the accuracy of the positioning. A group of 100 patients treated with the new workflow on two Versa HD linacs has been compared to a matched control group of patients treated with the former workflow, which included prepositioning with skin markings and lasers, SGRT and daily CBCT. The comparison was based on the evaluation of logfiles. Of the patients treated with the new workflow, 40% did not receive daily CBCT scans. This resulted in mean time savings of 97 s, 166 s and 239 s per fraction for the new workflow, for patients treated without daily CBCT and for SGRT-only fractions, respectively, when compared to the old workflow. Dose savings amounted to a weighted computed tomography dose index reduction of CTDI For 40% of the patients, after five fractions with small CBCT corrections, the workflow could be changed to SGRT-only positioning with weekly CBCT. This leads to imaging dose and time savings and thus also reduced intrafraction motion, potentially increased patient throughput and patient comfort, while assuring appropriate positioning accuracy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35788694
doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01966-7
pii: 10.1007/s00066-022-01966-7
pmc: PMC9839804
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22-29Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Jan;196(1):15-22
pubmed: 31722060
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Feb;197(2):150-157
pubmed: 33047151
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Nov;18(6):58-61
pubmed: 28901684
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Nov 08;15(6):4957
pubmed: 25493520
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jul 16;13(1):128
pubmed: 30012156
Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Feb;191(2):192-200
pubmed: 25238990
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Sep;20(9):61-68
pubmed: 31478615
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jun;20(6):39-44
pubmed: 31187538
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jan-Mar;3(1):16-25
pubmed: 24674259
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Apr;20(4):45-50
pubmed: 30945803
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 08;17(5):200-211
pubmed: 27685103
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jul 31;15(1):187
pubmed: 32736570
Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Nov;189(11):938-44
pubmed: 24068172
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Mar;20(3):97-104
pubmed: 30861276
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Nov;195(11):964-971
pubmed: 31332457