Analysis of pesticides, veterinary drugs, and environmental contaminants in goat and lamb by the QuEChERSER mega-method.


Journal

Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications
ISSN: 1759-9679
Titre abrégé: Anal Methods
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101519733

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 07 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 6 7 2022
medline: 26 7 2022
entrez: 5 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Analysis of chemical residues in foods is a big challenge for developing countries due to lack of financial and professional resources needed to meet international quality standards for trade. However, the implementation of simple multiclass, multi-residue methods in monitoring programs can provide significant benefits to save cost, time, and labor. The aim of this project was to investigate the "quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe, efficient, and robust" (QuEChERSER) mega-method for the fatty muscle matrices of goat and lamb. To achieve wide analytical scope covering pesticides, environmental contaminants, and veterinary drugs, extracts were analyzed by both ultrahigh-performance liquid and low-pressure gas chromatography (UHPLC and LPGC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The QuEChERSER mega-method was validated in ovine (goat) and caprine (lamb) muscles at four different spiking levels with 10 replicates per level for a total of 330 analytes and metabolites, consisting of 225 pesticides, 89 veterinary drugs, and 16 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In the case of LPGC-MS/MS (preceded by automated "instrument-top sample preparation"), 92% and 82% of the analytes met the data quality objectives of 70-120% recovery and <20% RSD for goat and lamb, respectively. For UHPLC-MS/MS, 95% and 92% of the analytes met the acceptable validation criteria in goat and lamb, respectively. Thus, the QuEChERSER mega-method has been demonstrated to be a useful streamlined approach to more efficiently replace multiple methods currently used to cover the same analytical scope.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35788773
doi: 10.1039/d2ay00713d
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pesticides 0
Veterinary Drugs 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2761-2770

Auteurs

Ederina Ninga (E)

Department of Toxicology and Residues Monitoring, Food Safety and Veterinary Institute, Tirana, Albania.

Steven J Lehotay (SJ)

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA 19038, USA. Steven.Lehotay@usda.gov.

Yelena Sapozhnikova (Y)

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA 19038, USA. Steven.Lehotay@usda.gov.

Alan R Lightfield (AR)

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA 19038, USA. Steven.Lehotay@usda.gov.

Gary D Strahan (GD)

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA 19038, USA. Steven.Lehotay@usda.gov.

Sergio H Monteiro (SH)

Pesticide Residue Laboratory, Environmental Protection Research Center, Biological Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH