Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review.


Journal

Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 10 04 2022
accepted: 14 06 2022
medline: 7 4 2023
pubmed: 6 7 2022
entrez: 5 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Surgical residents routinely participate in open and laparoscopic groin hernia repairs. The increasing popularity of robot-assisted groin hernia repair could lead to an educational loss for residents. We aimed to explore the involvement of surgical specialists and surgical residents, i.e., non-specialists, in robot-assisted groin hernia repair. The scoping review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guideline. A protocol was uploaded at Open Science Framework, and a systematic search was conducted in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Included studies had to report on robot-assisted groin hernia repairs. Data charting was conducted in duplicate. Of the 67 included studies, 85% of the studies described that the robot-assisted groin hernia repair was performed by a surgical specialist. The rest of the studies had no description of the primary operating surgeon. Only 13% of the included studies reported that a resident attended the robot-assisted groin hernia repair. Thus, robot-assisted groin hernia repair was mainly performed by surgical specialists, and robot-assisted groin hernia repair therefore seems to be underutilized to educate surgical residents.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35788971
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01440-7
pii: 10.1007/s11701-022-01440-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

291-301

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Micheletto G et al (2019) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 23:521–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01984-y
doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01984-y
Qabbani A, Aboumarzouk OM, ElBakry T et al (2021) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 91:2277–2287. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16505
doi: 10.1111/ans.16505 pubmed: 33475236
Broholm M, Rosenberg J (2015) Surgical residents are excluded from robot-assisted surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:449–450. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000190
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000190 pubmed: 26429054
Kadakia N, Malek K, Lee SK et al (2020) Impact of robotic surgery on residency training for herniorrhaphy and cholecystectomy. Am Surg 86:1318–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820964430
doi: 10.1177/0003134820964430 pubmed: 33103443
Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am 73:413–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(16)46027-5
doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)46027-5 pubmed: 8497793
Malangoni MA, Biester TW, Jones AT et al (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70:783–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSURG.2013.09.015
doi: 10.1016/J.JSURG.2013.09.015 pubmed: 24209656
Usui S, Inoue H, Yoshida T et al (2004) Preliminary report of multi degrees of freedom forceps for endoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200404000-00004
doi: 10.1097/00129689-200404000-00004 pubmed: 15287603
Herron DM, Marohn M, Advincula A et al (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00464-007-9727-5
doi: 10.1007/S00464-007-9727-5 pubmed: 18163170
Oppenheimer P, Weghorst S, MacFarlane M, Sinanan M (1999) Immersive surgical robotic interfaces. Stud Health Technol Inform 62:242–248. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-906-6-242
doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-906-6-242 pubmed: 10538365
Mustafa S, Handren E, Farmer D et al (2019) Robotic curriculum enhances minimally invasive general surgery residents’ education. J Surg Educ 76:548–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.08.020
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.08.020 pubmed: 30217777
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C et al (2018) Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 18:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12874-018-0611-X/TABLES/1
doi: 10.1186/S12874-018-0611-X/TABLES/1
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W et al (2018) PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169:467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
doi: 10.7326/M18-0850 pubmed: 30178033
Hansen DL, Gram-Hanssen A, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J (2021) Educational level of surgeons performing robot-assisted groin hernia repair: a scoping review. OSF registration. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R2ZAC
Rayyan QCRI. https://rayyan.qcri.org/ . Accessed 10 April 2022
Greenhalgh T, Peacock R (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 331:1064–1065. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 pubmed: 16230312 pmcid: 1283190
Awad MA, Buzalewski J, Anderson C et al (2020) Robotic inguinal hernia repair outcomes: operative time and cost analysis. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 24:e2020.00058. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00058
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00058
Bellorin O, Senturk JC, Cruz MV et al (2022) A cost analysis of two- versus three-instrument robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with mesh: time is money. J Robot Surg 16:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01250-3
doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01250-3 pubmed: 33997917
Bilezikian JA, Tenzel PL, Johnson RG et al (2021) A preliminary evaluation of two different meshes in minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery. Surg Endosc 35:1342–1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07512-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07512-9 pubmed: 32232645
Bittner Iv JG, Cesnik LW, Kirwan T et al (2018) Patient perceptions of acute pain and activity disruption following inguinal hernia repair: a propensity-matched comparison of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches. J Robot Surg 12:625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0790-9
doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0790-9 pubmed: 29453731 pmcid: 6223756
Bou-Ayash N, Gokcal F, Kudsi OY (2021) Robotic inguinal hernia repair for incarcerated hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 31:926–930. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0607
doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0607
Charles EJ, Mehaffey JH, Tache-Leon CA et al (2018) Inguinal hernia repair: is there a benefit to using the robot? Surg Endosc 32:2131–2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5911-4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5911-4 pubmed: 29067575
Cuccurullo D, Guerriero L, Favoriti P et al (2020) Robotic-assisted single site (RASS) TAPP: an advantageous choice? Outcomes of single site robotic groin hernia repair. Hernia 24:1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02274-8
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02274-8 pubmed: 32712836
Dewulf M, Aspeslagh L, Nachtergaele F et al (2022) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after previous transabdominal prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 36:2105–2112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08497-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08497-9 pubmed: 33796906
Dickens EO, Kolachalam R, Gonzalez A et al (2018) Does robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) hernia repair facilitate contralateral investigation and repair without compromising patient morbidity? J Robot Surg 12:713–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0815-4
doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0815-4 pubmed: 29713930
Diez-Barroso R, Palacio CH, Martinez JA et al (2018) Robotic port-site hernias after general surgical procedures. J Surg Res 230:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.032
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.032 pubmed: 30100042
Abdelmoaty WF, Dunst CM, Neighorn C et al (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis. Surg Endosc 33:3436–3443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9 pubmed: 30535936
Escobar Dominguez JE, Ramos MG, Seetharamaiah R et al (2016) Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience. Surg Endosc 30:4042–4048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4717-5
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4717-5 pubmed: 26718359
Esen E, Aytac E, Ozben V et al (2019) Adoption of robotic technology in Turkey: a nationwide analysis on caseload and platform used. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 15:e1962. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1962
doi: 10.1002/rcs.1962
Ebeling PA, Beale KG, Van Sickle KR et al (2020) Resident training experience with robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 219:278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.014
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.014 pubmed: 31780043
Edelman DS (2017) Robotic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 83:1418–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481708301229
doi: 10.1177/000313481708301229 pubmed: 29336765
Edelman DS (2020) Robotic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Technol Int 36:99–104
pubmed: 32432334
Engan C, Engan M, Bonilla V et al (2015) Description of robotically assisted single-site transabdominal preperitoneal (RASS-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair and presentation of clinical outcomes. Hernia 19:423–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1311-z
doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1311-z pubmed: 25249251
Gamagami R, Dickens E, Gonzalez A et al (2018) Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes. Hernia 22:827–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1769-1
doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1769-1 pubmed: 29700716
Gonzalez-Hernandez J, Prajapati P, Ogola G et al (2018) Surgical training in robotic surgery: surgical experience of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy with and without resident participation. J Robot Surg 12:487–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0771-4
doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0771-4 pubmed: 29307096
Gundogdu E, Guldogan CE, Ozmen MM (2020) Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: robotic TAPP versus laparoscopic TEP. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 31:439–443. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000890
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000890 pubmed: 33347086
Hey MT, Mayhew MM, Rico S et al (2021) Initial experience with robotic inguinal hernia repair in the adolescent population. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 31:1346–1350. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0301
doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0301 pubmed: 34252321
Aghayeva A, Aytac E, Dinc T et al (2020) Learning curve analysis of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 16:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2150
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2150
Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4954-2
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4954-2 pubmed: 27139704
Holleran TJ, Napolitano MA, Sparks AD et al (2021) Trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair in the veterans affairs system. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02419-3
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02419-3 pubmed: 34191206
Huerta S, Timmerman C, Argo M et al (2019) Open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair: outcomes and predictors of complications. J Surg Res 241:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.046
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.046 pubmed: 31022677
Huynh D, Fadaee N, Al-Aufey B et al (2020) Robotic iliopubic tract (r-IPT) repair: technique and preliminary outcomes of a minimally invasive tissue repair for inguinal hernia. Hernia 24:1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02259-7
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02259-7 pubmed: 32638244
Iraniha A, Peloquin JAI (2018) Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair. J Robot Surg 12:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8
doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8 pubmed: 28707149
Janjua H, Cousin-Peterson E, Barry TM et al (2020) The paradox of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia repair in the inpatient setting. Am J Surg 219:497–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.012
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.012 pubmed: 31558306
Janjua H, Cousin-Peterson E, Barry TM et al (2020) Robotic approach to outpatient inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 231:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.04.031
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.04.031 pubmed: 32380165
Kakiashvili E, Bez M, Abu Shakra I et al (2020) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is it a new era in the management of inguinal hernia? Asian J Surg 44:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.03.015
doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.03.015 pubmed: 32291130
Khoraki J, Gomez PP, Mazzini GS et al (2020) Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 34:3496–3507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07128-8
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07128-8 pubmed: 31571036
Kosturakis AK, LaRusso KE, Carroll ND, Nicholl MB (2018) First 100 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs at a Veterans Affairs hospital. J Robot Surg 12:699–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0812-7
doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0812-7 pubmed: 29721702
Aghayeva A, Benlice C, Bilgin IA et al (2020) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal vs robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: assessment of short- and long term outcomes. Int J Med Robot 16:e2111. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2111
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2111 pubmed: 32303112
Kudsi OY, Bou-Ayash N, Gokcal F (2021) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02433-5
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02433-5 pubmed: 34057626
Kudsi OY, McCarty JC, Paluvoi N, Mabardy AS (2017) Transition from laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair to robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective review of a single surgeon’s experience. World J Surg 41:2251–2257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3
doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3 pubmed: 28337532
LeBlanc K, Dickens E, Gonzalez A et al (2020) Prospective, multicenter, pairwise analysis of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: early results from the Prospective Hernia Study. Hernia 24:1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02224-4
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02224-4 pubmed: 32495043
Maas MC, Alicuben ET, Houghton CC et al (2021) Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted groin hernia repair. J Robot Surg 15:547–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01140-0
doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01140-0 pubmed: 32779131
Mehaffey JH, Michaels AD, Mullen MG et al (2017) Adoption of robotics in a general surgery residency program: at what cost? J Surg Res 213:269–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.052
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.052 pubmed: 28601325
Morrell ALG, Morrell Junior AC, Mendes JMF et al (2021) Robotic TAPP inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 97 cases. Rev Col Bras Cir 48:e20202704. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202704
doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202704 pubmed: 33533825
Muysoms F, Van Cleven S, Kyle-Leinhase I et al (2018) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic groin hernia repair: observational case–control study on the operative time during the learning curve. Surg Endosc 32:4850–4859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6236-7
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6236-7 pubmed: 29766308
Muysoms F, Vierstraete M, Nachtergaele F et al (2021) Economic assessment of starting robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a single-centre retrospective comparative study: the EASTER study. BJS Open 5:zraa046. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa046
Oviedo RJ, Robertson JC, Alrajhi S (2016) First 101 robotic general surgery cases in a community hospital. JSLS 20:e2016.00056. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00056
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00056 pubmed: 27667913 pmcid: 5027890
Pereira X, Lima DL, Friedmann P et al (2022) Robotic abdominal wall repair: adoption and early outcomes in a large academic medical center. J Robot Surg 16:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01251-2
doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01251-2 pubmed: 34018122
AlMarzooqi R, Tish S, Huang L-CC et al (2019) Review of inguinal hernia repair techniques within the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Hernia 23:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01968-y
doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01968-y pubmed: 31069581
Pini R, Mongelli F, Proietti F et al (2021) Suture and fixation of the transversalis fascia during robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair to prevent seroma formation after direct inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov 28:284–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350620960976
doi: 10.1177/1553350620960976 pubmed: 32936065
Pokala B, Armijo PR, Flores L et al (2019) Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review. Hernia 23:593–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01934-8
doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01934-8 pubmed: 31073960
Prabhu AS, Carbonell A, Hope W et al (2020) Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the RIVAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 155:380–387. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034 pubmed: 32186683 pmcid: 7081145
Proietti F, La Regina D, Pini R et al (2021) Learning curve of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP) for inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc 35:6643–6649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08165-4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08165-4 pubmed: 33258030
Quilici PJ, Wolberg H, McConnell N (2022) Operating costs, fiscal impact, value analysis and guidance for the routine use of robotic technology in abdominal surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 36:1433–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08428-8
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08428-8 pubmed: 33835252
Ramser M, Baur J, Keller N et al (2021) Robotic hernia surgery I. English version. Chirurg 92:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01446-1
doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01446-1 pubmed: 34185126 pmcid: 8695554
Rose ED, Modlin DM, Ciampa ML et al (2019) Evaluation of operative waste in a military medical center: analysis of operating room cost and waste during surgical cases. Am Surg 85:717–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481908500729
doi: 10.1177/000313481908500729 pubmed: 31405414
Saito T, Fukami Y, Uchino T et al (2020) Preliminary results of robotic inguinal hernia repair following its introduction in a single-center trial. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 4:441–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12341
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12341 pubmed: 32724888 pmcid: 7382428
Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB et al (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3:e1918911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911 pubmed: 31922557 pmcid: 6991252
Sheldon RR, Do WS, Weiss JB et al (2019) Sage wisdom or anecdotal dictum? Equivalent opioid use after open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 217:839–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.022
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.022 pubmed: 30827531
Al-Naami M, Anjum MN, Aldohayan A et al (2013) Robotic general surgery experience: a gradual progress from simple to more complex procedures. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9:486–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1521
doi: 10.1002/rcs.1521
Tam V, Rogers DE, Al-Abbas A et al (2019) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: a large health system’s experience with the first 300 cases and review of the literature. J Surg Res 235:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.070
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.070 pubmed: 30691857
Tatarian T, Nie L, McPartland C et al (2021) Comparative perioperative and 5-year outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair: a study of 153,727 patients in the state of New York. Surg Endosc 35:7209–7218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08211-1
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08211-1 pubmed: 33398566
Vossler JD, Pavlosky KK, Murayama SM et al (2019) Predictors of robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res 241:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.056
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.056 pubmed: 31035139
Waite KE, Herman MA, Doyle PJ (2016) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. J Robot Surg 10:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1
doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1 pubmed: 27112781
Yu C-C, Lo C-W, Chen Y-T et al (2020) Novel robot-assisted laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal repair with primary fascial closure plus pre-peritonea mesh for large groin defects. Int J Med Robot 16:e2052. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2052
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2052 pubmed: 31677211
Zayan NE, Meara MP, Schwartz JS, Narula VK (2019) A direct comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hernia repair: patient-reported outcomes and cost analysis. Hernia 23:1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01943-7
doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01943-7 pubmed: 31037492
Kolachalam R, Dickens E, D’Amico L et al (2018) Early outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a multi-institutional, retrospective study. Surg Endosc 32:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5665-z
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5665-z pubmed: 28646321
Angus A, DeMare A, Iacco A et al (2020) Evaluating outcomes for robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in males with prior urologic surgery: a propensity-matched analysis from a national database. Surg Endosc 35:5310–5314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08020-6
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08020-6 pubmed: 33006032
Arcerito M, Changchien E, Bernal O et al (2016) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: technique and early experience. Am Surg 82:1014–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481608201035
doi: 10.1177/000313481608201035 pubmed: 27779996
Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E et al (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons’ conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32:2106–2113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5908-z
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5908-z pubmed: 29067582
Tang JB, Giddins G (2016) Why and how to report surgeons’ levels of expertise. J Hand Surg Eur 41:365–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416641590
doi: 10.1177/1753193416641590
Massel DH, Lezak BA, Summers SH et al (2020) Surgeon level of expertise reported in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and (European Volume) publications. J Hand Surg Eur 45:904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193420932517
doi: 10.1177/1753193420932517
Yakkanti RR, Massel DH, Lezak BA et al (2021) Surgeon level of expertise in adult reconstruction: a brief communication regarding the need for reporting the level of expertise. Arthroplast Today 8:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTD.2020.12.011
doi: 10.1016/J.ARTD.2020.12.011 pubmed: 33665274 pmcid: 7899946
Christophersen C, Fonnes S, Andresen K et al (2022) Lower recurrence rate after groin and primary ventral hernia repair performed by high-volume surgeons: a systematic review. Hernia 26:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02359-4
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02359-4 pubmed: 33404970
Christophersen C, Baker JJ, Fonnes S et al (2021) Lower reoperation rates after open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair when performed by high-volume surgeons: a nationwide register-based study. Hernia 25:1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02400-0
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02400-0 pubmed: 33835325
Lederhuber H, Hanßke B, Dahlstrand U (2021) Impact of trainee participation on inguinal hernia repair outcome: a study based on the swedish hernia register. Ann Surg 274:e62–e69. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003497
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003497 pubmed: 31365364
Köckerling F (2018) What is the influence of simulation-based training courses, the learning curve, supervision, and surgeon volume on the outcome in hernia repair? A systematic review. Front Surg 5:57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2018.00057
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00057 pubmed: 30324107 pmcid: 6172312
Zhao B, Hollandsworth HM, Lee AM et al (2020) Making the jump: a qualitative analysis on the transition from bedside assistant to console surgeon in robotic surgery training. J Surg Educ 77:461–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSURG.2019.09.015
doi: 10.1016/J.JSURG.2019.09.015 pubmed: 31558428

Auteurs

Danni Lip Hansen (DL)

Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark. lip.dlh.h@gmail.com.

Anders Gram-Hanssen (A)

Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.

Siv Fonnes (S)

Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.

Jacob Rosenberg (J)

Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH