Personalized treatment supported by automated quantitative fluid analysis in active neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)-a phase III, prospective, multicentre, randomized study: design and methods.
Humans
Ranibizumab
/ therapeutic use
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ therapeutic use
Artificial Intelligence
Prospective Studies
Precision Medicine
Intravitreal Injections
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Subretinal Fluid
Macular Degeneration
/ drug therapy
Journal
Eye (London, England)
ISSN: 1476-5454
Titre abrégé: Eye (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
received:
20
12
2021
accepted:
16
06
2022
revised:
15
06
2022
medline:
11
5
2023
pubmed:
6
7
2022
entrez:
5
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) the exact amount of fluid and its location on optical coherence tomography (OCT) have been defined as crucial biomarkers for disease activity and therapeutic decisions. Yet in the absence of quantitative evaluation tools, real-world care outcomes are disappointing. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a practical option for clinicians to enhance point-of-care management by analysing OCT volumes in a short time. In this protocol we present the prospective implementation of an AI-algorithm providing automated real-time fluid quantifications in a clinical real-world setting. This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized (1:1) and double masked phase III clinical trial. Two-hundred-ninety patients with active nAMD will be randomized between a study arm using AI-supported fluid quantifications and another arm using conventional qualitative assessments, i.e. state-of-the-art disease management. The primary outcome is defined as the mean number of injections over 1 year. Change in BCVA is defined as a secondary outcome. Automated measurement of fluid volumes in all retinal compartments such as intraretinal fluid (IRF), and subretinal fluid (SRF) will serve as an objective tool for clinical investigators on which to base retreatment decisions. Compared to qualitative fluid assessment, retreatment decisions will be plausible and less prone to error or large variability. The underlying hypothesis is that fluid should be treated, while residual persistent or stable amounts of fluid may not benefit from further therapy. Reducing injection numbers without diminishing the visual benefit will increase overall patient safety and relieve the burden for healthcare providers. EudraCT-Number: 2019-003133-42.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35790835
doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02154-8
pii: 10.1038/s41433-022-02154-8
pmc: PMC9255834
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1464-1469Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;106(1):113-120
pubmed: 33087314
Retina. 2015 Jul;35(7):1303-14
pubmed: 26102433
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016 Jan;50:1-24
pubmed: 26307399
Ophthalmology. 2013 Apr;120(4):844-51
pubmed: 23332590
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;192:184-197
pubmed: 29885297
Retina. 2021 Jun 1;41(6):1318-1328
pubmed: 33230065
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;152(6):1014-20
pubmed: 21843875
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;219:222-230
pubmed: 32621894
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 15;4(1):e000398
pubmed: 31909196
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;180:8-17
pubmed: 28549848
Ophthalmology. 2018 Apr;125(4):549-558
pubmed: 29224926
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;137(1):156-69
pubmed: 14700659
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;94(5):e353-5
pubmed: 26385270
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jan;123(1):60-9
pubmed: 26481821
Nat Med. 2018 Sep;24(9):1342-1350
pubmed: 30104768
Eye (Lond). 2021 Nov;35(11):2983-2990
pubmed: 33414525
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021 Jan-Feb 01;10(1):39-48
pubmed: 33512827
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):57-65
pubmed: 28893454
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Jul;2(7):645-653
pubmed: 31047372
Ophthalmology. 2019 May;126(5):723-734
pubmed: 30502372
Eye Vis (Lond). 2016 Dec 22;3:34
pubmed: 28032115
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;98(9):1144-67
pubmed: 25136079
Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;2(1):1-14
pubmed: 19668384
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Feb;2(2):e106-16
pubmed: 25104651
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Oct;20(4):3469-3473
pubmed: 32905155
Ophthalmology. 2021 Jan;128(1):100-109
pubmed: 32598950
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Nov;7(11):1125-1132
pubmed: 30238792
Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2181-92
pubmed: 25015215
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;255(7):1259-1273
pubmed: 28527040
Eye (Lond). 2013 Jul;27(7):787-94
pubmed: 23722722
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;134(2):182-90
pubmed: 26661463
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;224:267-281
pubmed: 33359681
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 Nov;67:1-29
pubmed: 30076935