A phase II pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility of the "supra-marginal" surgical resection of malignant glioma (G-SUMIT: Glioma supra marginal incision trial) study protocol.

High-grade gliomas Malignant brain tumor Supra-marginal resection

Journal

Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jul 2022
Historique:
received: 17 11 2021
accepted: 23 06 2022
entrez: 5 7 2022
pubmed: 6 7 2022
medline: 6 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

High-grade gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults having a median survival of only 13-16 months. This is despite the current standard of maximal safe surgical resection followed by fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Extending the tumor resection limit beyond the gadolinium (GAD)-enhancing margin (i.e., supra-marginal resection) could in principle provide an added survival benefit as it has been shown that > 80% of post-operative tumor recurrence is within a 2-cm region surrounding the original GAD-enhancing margin. However, this must be weighed against the risk of potential damage to functional brain tissue. In this phase II pilot randomized control trial (RCT), we aim to assess the feasibility of "supra-marginal" resection extending 1 cm beyond the enhancing tumor in adults with radiographic evidence of GAD-enhancing intra-axial tumor consistent with high-grade glioma in a safe anatomical location and a Karnofsky Performance Score > 60. With six academic institutions with established neurosurgical oncology practices in participation, we aim to enroll 72 patients over 2 years. Primary outcomes include evaluating the feasibility of performing a large-scale trial with regard to recruitment, allocation, and outcome documentation as well as safety data. Secondary outcomes include determining if there is an increased survival benefit with supra-marginal resection and impact on quality of life (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), EuroQol-5D (ED-5D), 30-day all-cause mortality). Recent studies have revealed survival advantages comparing supra-marginal resection to standard attempt at gross total resection (GTR) with no additional perioperative surgical risk; however, the current quality of evidence is low and under-powered. Therefore, there are no current practice guidelines, and the philosophy of surgical resection is guided by individual surgeon preferences on an individual patient basis. This creates additional uncertainty and is potentially detrimental to our patients. This clinical equipoise supports the need for an adequately powered RCT to determine whether a supra-marginal resection can have a positive impact on survival for patients with HGGs. Our pilot RCT will test the feasibility of comparing the standard gross total resection of GAD-enhancing tumors and supra-marginal resection to prepare for a larger definitive multicenter RCT. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04737577. Registered on February 4, 2021.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
High-grade gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults having a median survival of only 13-16 months. This is despite the current standard of maximal safe surgical resection followed by fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Extending the tumor resection limit beyond the gadolinium (GAD)-enhancing margin (i.e., supra-marginal resection) could in principle provide an added survival benefit as it has been shown that > 80% of post-operative tumor recurrence is within a 2-cm region surrounding the original GAD-enhancing margin. However, this must be weighed against the risk of potential damage to functional brain tissue.
METHODS METHODS
In this phase II pilot randomized control trial (RCT), we aim to assess the feasibility of "supra-marginal" resection extending 1 cm beyond the enhancing tumor in adults with radiographic evidence of GAD-enhancing intra-axial tumor consistent with high-grade glioma in a safe anatomical location and a Karnofsky Performance Score > 60. With six academic institutions with established neurosurgical oncology practices in participation, we aim to enroll 72 patients over 2 years. Primary outcomes include evaluating the feasibility of performing a large-scale trial with regard to recruitment, allocation, and outcome documentation as well as safety data. Secondary outcomes include determining if there is an increased survival benefit with supra-marginal resection and impact on quality of life (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), EuroQol-5D (ED-5D), 30-day all-cause mortality).
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Recent studies have revealed survival advantages comparing supra-marginal resection to standard attempt at gross total resection (GTR) with no additional perioperative surgical risk; however, the current quality of evidence is low and under-powered. Therefore, there are no current practice guidelines, and the philosophy of surgical resection is guided by individual surgeon preferences on an individual patient basis. This creates additional uncertainty and is potentially detrimental to our patients. This clinical equipoise supports the need for an adequately powered RCT to determine whether a supra-marginal resection can have a positive impact on survival for patients with HGGs. Our pilot RCT will test the feasibility of comparing the standard gross total resection of GAD-enhancing tumors and supra-marginal resection to prepare for a larger definitive multicenter RCT.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04737577. Registered on February 4, 2021.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35791008
doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01104-1
pii: 10.1186/s40814-022-01104-1
pmc: PMC9254510
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04737577']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

138

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
ID : 169031
Pays : Canada

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Stroke. 2011 Aug;42(8):2276-9
pubmed: 21680905
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 May 1;68(1):144-50
pubmed: 17306935
J Neurosurg. 1988 May;68(5):698-704
pubmed: 2833587
Oncotarget. 2016 May 3;7(18):25755-68
pubmed: 27036027
J Neurosurg. 1987 Jun;66(6):865-74
pubmed: 3033172
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;20(suppl_4):iv1-iv86
pubmed: 30445539
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Jun;155(6):951-7
pubmed: 23447053
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jul;115(1):3-8
pubmed: 21417701
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2306-2316
pubmed: 29260225
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):e395-403
pubmed: 25079102
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):774-82
pubmed: 24516010
J Neurosurg. 1983 Feb;58(2):159-69
pubmed: 6294260
Lancet Oncol. 2006 May;7(5):392-401
pubmed: 16648043
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Oct;23(10):1985-96
pubmed: 25053711
Radiology. 1988 Mar;166(3):823-7
pubmed: 2829270
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 1;66(3):818-24
pubmed: 16887285
J Neurosurg. 2001 Aug;95(2):190-8
pubmed: 11780887
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 1;79(1):130-6
pubmed: 20399036
Stroke. 1989 Jul;20(7):864-70
pubmed: 2749846
Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Apr;14(2):307-320
pubmed: 28108885
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;54(12):1044-54
pubmed: 1783914
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Feb 14;21(2):179-188
pubmed: 30321384
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Nov 01;2(11):1460-1469
pubmed: 27310651

Auteurs

Alireza Mansouri (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State University, State College, USA. amansouri@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.

Carolyn Lai (C)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Damon Scales (D)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Farhad Pirouzmand (F)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Classifications MeSH