Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in psoriasis: results from a 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal, phase III trial (OASIS-1).


Journal

The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2022
Historique:
revised: 29 06 2022
received: 08 02 2022
accepted: 02 07 2022
pubmed: 7 7 2022
medline: 7 12 2022
entrez: 6 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Interleukin-23 inhibitors are effective and safe for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis through 52 weeks in a phase III randomized controlled trial. OASIS-1 (NCT03482011) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal, phase III trial. Patients (n = 530, randomized 4 : 1) received subcutaneous mirikizumab 250 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) through week 16. Coprimary endpoints were superiority of mirikizumab vs. placebo on static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA; score of 0 or 1 with ≥ 2-point improvement) and ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90, responders) at week 16. Mirikizumab responders were rerandomized (1 : 1 : 1) to mirikizumab 250 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W), mirikizumab 125 mg Q8W, or placebo Q8W through week 52. Secondary endpoints were evaluated at weeks 16 and 52. Safety was monitored in all patients. All primary and key secondary endpoints were met. At week 16, sPGA(0,1) responses were significantly greater with mirikizumab (293 of 423, 69·3%) than placebo (seven of 107, 6·5%) (P < 0·001). PASI 90 response was also greater with mirikizumab (272 of 423, 64·3%) than placebo (seven of 107, 6·5%) (P < 0·001). Significantly more patients in the mirikizumab arms achieved PASI 75 and PASI 100 (mirikizumab 349, 82·5% and 137, 32·4%; placebo 10, 9·3% and 1, 0·9%, respectively; all P < 0·001). At week 52, PASI 90, PASI 100 and sPGA(0,1) responses were mirikizumab 250Q4W/placeboQ8W (N = 91; 19%, 10%, 18%), mirikizumab 250Q4W/125Q8W (N = 90; 86%, 59%, 86%) and mirikizumab 250Q4W/250Q8W (N = 91; 86%, 60%, 82%; all P < 0·001), respectively. Rates of serious adverse events were similar across treatments (induction: mirikizumab 1·2% vs. placebo 1·9%; maintenance: mirikizumab 250Q4W/125Q8W 1%, mirikizumab 250Q4W/250Q8W 3% vs. placebo 3%). No deaths occurred. Mirikizumab was superior to placebo at week 16 and maintained efficacy through week 52, with no new safety signals. What is already known about this topic? Interleukin (IL)-23 is a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Drugs targeting the p19 subunit of IL-23 have recently been approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis achieved significantly greater improvements in skin measures and patient-reported quality-of-life measures after 16 weeks when treated every 8 weeks with mirikizumab compared with placebo in a phase II clinical trial. What does this study add? Compared with placebo, mirikizumab demonstrated high levels of efficacy at week 16 in a large phase III trial; safety profiles were similar between the mirikizumab and placebo arms. After week 16, patients maintained on doses of mirikizumab 250 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) or 125 mg Q8W showed similar efficacy and favourable safety profiles over 52 weeks, whereas patients switched to placebo gradually lost efficacy over time.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Interleukin-23 inhibitors are effective and safe for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis through 52 weeks in a phase III randomized controlled trial.
METHODS
OASIS-1 (NCT03482011) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal, phase III trial. Patients (n = 530, randomized 4 : 1) received subcutaneous mirikizumab 250 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) through week 16. Coprimary endpoints were superiority of mirikizumab vs. placebo on static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA; score of 0 or 1 with ≥ 2-point improvement) and ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90, responders) at week 16. Mirikizumab responders were rerandomized (1 : 1 : 1) to mirikizumab 250 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W), mirikizumab 125 mg Q8W, or placebo Q8W through week 52. Secondary endpoints were evaluated at weeks 16 and 52. Safety was monitored in all patients.
RESULTS
All primary and key secondary endpoints were met. At week 16, sPGA(0,1) responses were significantly greater with mirikizumab (293 of 423, 69·3%) than placebo (seven of 107, 6·5%) (P < 0·001). PASI 90 response was also greater with mirikizumab (272 of 423, 64·3%) than placebo (seven of 107, 6·5%) (P < 0·001). Significantly more patients in the mirikizumab arms achieved PASI 75 and PASI 100 (mirikizumab 349, 82·5% and 137, 32·4%; placebo 10, 9·3% and 1, 0·9%, respectively; all P < 0·001). At week 52, PASI 90, PASI 100 and sPGA(0,1) responses were mirikizumab 250Q4W/placeboQ8W (N = 91; 19%, 10%, 18%), mirikizumab 250Q4W/125Q8W (N = 90; 86%, 59%, 86%) and mirikizumab 250Q4W/250Q8W (N = 91; 86%, 60%, 82%; all P < 0·001), respectively. Rates of serious adverse events were similar across treatments (induction: mirikizumab 1·2% vs. placebo 1·9%; maintenance: mirikizumab 250Q4W/125Q8W 1%, mirikizumab 250Q4W/250Q8W 3% vs. placebo 3%). No deaths occurred.
CONCLUSIONS
Mirikizumab was superior to placebo at week 16 and maintained efficacy through week 52, with no new safety signals. What is already known about this topic? Interleukin (IL)-23 is a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Drugs targeting the p19 subunit of IL-23 have recently been approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis achieved significantly greater improvements in skin measures and patient-reported quality-of-life measures after 16 weeks when treated every 8 weeks with mirikizumab compared with placebo in a phase II clinical trial. What does this study add? Compared with placebo, mirikizumab demonstrated high levels of efficacy at week 16 in a large phase III trial; safety profiles were similar between the mirikizumab and placebo arms. After week 16, patients maintained on doses of mirikizumab 250 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) or 125 mg Q8W showed similar efficacy and favourable safety profiles over 52 weeks, whereas patients switched to placebo gradually lost efficacy over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35791755
doi: 10.1111/bjd.21743
pmc: PMC10087045
doi:

Substances chimiques

mirikizumab Z7HVY03PHP
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Interleukin-23 0

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

866-877

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.

Références

Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jul;181(1):88-95
pubmed: 30734266
Lancet. 2007 Jul 21;370(9583):263-271
pubmed: 17658397
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Nov 19;133(24):2998-3000
pubmed: 33337760
J Immunol. 2018 Sep 15;201(6):1605-1613
pubmed: 30181299
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Feb;34(2):301-309
pubmed: 31479549
J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Dec;139(12):2437-2446.e1
pubmed: 31207232
J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Feb;133(2):377-85
pubmed: 23014338
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Mar;182(3):605-617
pubmed: 31218661
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):345-56
pubmed: 27299809
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Jun;10(3):431-447
pubmed: 32200512
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Feb;82(2):352-359
pubmed: 31175909
Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):650-661
pubmed: 30097359
J Invest Dermatol. 2020 May;140(5):1015-1025.e4
pubmed: 31715177
J Immunol. 2014 Apr 1;192(7):3111-20
pubmed: 24610014
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):831-839
pubmed: 31402114
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007 Dec;9(6):461-7
pubmed: 18177599
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Jun 1;156(6):649-658
pubmed: 32267471
Biom J. 2011 Nov;53(6):894-913
pubmed: 21837623
Gastroenterology. 2022 Feb;162(2):495-508
pubmed: 34748774
Gastroenterology. 2020 Feb;158(3):537-549.e10
pubmed: 31493397
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76(3):418-431
pubmed: 28057361
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jan;184(1):50-59
pubmed: 32594522
J Invest Dermatol. 2021 Jul;141(7):1707-1718.e9
pubmed: 33524368

Auteurs

Andrew Blauvelt (A)

Oregon Medical Research Center, Portland, OR, USA.

Alexa B Kimball (AB)

Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Matthias Augustin (M)

Health Care Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Yukari Okubo (Y)

Department of Dermatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Michael M Witte (MM)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Claudia Rodriguez Capriles (CR)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Angelina Sontag (A)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Vipin Arora (V)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Olawale Osuntokun (O)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Bruce Strober (B)

Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Central Connecticut Dermatology Research, Cromwell, CT, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH