Development of consensus recommendations for the management of post-operative chylothorax in paediatric CHD.
Chylothorax
cardiac surgery
consensus
guidelines
paediatric
Journal
Cardiology in the young
ISSN: 1467-1107
Titre abrégé: Cardiol Young
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9200019
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
7
7
2022
medline:
18
8
2022
entrez:
6
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A standardised multi-site approach to manage paediatric post-operative chylothorax does not exist and leads to unnecessary practice variation. The Over 60 multi-disciplinary providers representing 22 centres convened virtually as a quality initiative to develop an algorithm to manage paediatric post-operative chylothorax. Agreement was objectively quantified for each recommendation in the algorithm by utilising an anonymous survey. "Consensus" was defined as ≥ 80% of responses as "agree" or "strongly agree" to a recommendation. In order to determine if the algorithm recommendations would be correctly interpreted in the clinical environment, we developed ex vivo simulations and surveyed patients who developed the algorithm and patients who did not. The algorithm is intended for all children (<18 years of age) within 30 days of cardiac surgery. It contains rationale for 11 central chylothorax management recommendations; diagnostic criteria and evaluation, trial of fat-modified diet, stratification by volume of daily output, timing of first-line medical therapy for "low" and "high" volume patients, and timing and duration of fat-modified diet. All recommendations achieved "consensus" (agreement >80%) by the workgroup (range 81-100%). Ex vivo simulations demonstrated good understanding by developers (range 94-100%) and non-developers (73%-100%). The quality improvement effort represents the first multi-site algorithm for the management of paediatric post-operative chylothorax. The algorithm includes transparent and objective measures of agreement and understanding. Agreement to the algorithm recommendations was >80%, and overall understanding was 94%.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35792060
pii: S1047951122001871
doi: 10.1017/S1047951122001871
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM