Serological testing of blood donors to characterise the impact of COVID-19 in Melbourne, Australia, 2020.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
07
03
2022
accepted:
21
06
2022
entrez:
6
7
2022
pubmed:
7
7
2022
medline:
9
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rapidly identifying and isolating people with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection has been a core strategy to contain COVID-19 in Australia, but a proportion of infections go undetected. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody prevalence (seroprevalence) among blood donors in metropolitan Melbourne following a COVID-19 outbreak in the city between June and September 2020. The aim was to determine the extent of infection spread and whether seroprevalence varied demographically in proportion to reported cases of infection. The design involved stratified sampling of residual specimens from blood donors (aged 20-69 years) in three postcode groups defined by low (<3 cases/1,000 population), medium (3-7 cases/1,000 population) and high (>7 cases/1,000 population) COVID-19 incidence based on case notification data. All specimens were tested using the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 total antibody assay. Seroprevalence was estimated with adjustment for test sensitivity and specificity for the Melbourne metropolitan blood donor and residential populations, using multilevel regression and poststratification. Overall, 4,799 specimens were collected between 23 November and 17 December 2020. Seroprevalence for blood donors was 0.87% (90% credible interval: 0.25-1.49%). The highest estimates, of 1.13% (0.25-2.15%) and 1.11% (0.28-1.95%), respectively, were observed among donors living in the lowest socioeconomic areas (Quintiles 1 and 2) and lowest at 0.69% (0.14-1.39%) among donors living in the highest socioeconomic areas (Quintile 5). When extrapolated to the Melbourne residential population, overall seroprevalence was 0.90% (0.26-1.51%), with estimates by demography groups similar to those for the blood donors. The results suggest a lack of extensive community transmission and good COVID-19 case ascertainment based on routine testing during Victoria's second epidemic wave. Residual blood donor samples provide a practical epidemiological tool for estimating seroprevalence and information on population patterns of infection, against which the effectiveness of ongoing responses to the pandemic can be assessed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35793307
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265858
pii: PONE-D-22-06787
pmc: PMC9258843
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0265858Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Infect. 2021 Aug;83(2):237-279
pubmed: 33989631
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 31;9(3):ofac002
pubmed: 35169588
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):e75-e76
pubmed: 32763195
J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 5;225(1):1-4
pubmed: 34626464
JAMA. 2021 Oct 12;326(14):1400-1409
pubmed: 34473201
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 May 10;8(7):ofab239
pubmed: 34258311
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 9;74(5):871-881
pubmed: 34111244
Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2020 Jun 29;44:
pubmed: 32600222
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0169112
pubmed: 28182624
Transfusion. 2021 Oct;61(10):2855-2861
pubmed: 34423437
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Feb 26;17(2):e1008728
pubmed: 33635863
Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2021 Jan 18;45:
pubmed: 33460555
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 1;11(4):e045425
pubmed: 33795310
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e598-e609
pubmed: 33705690
Med J Aust. 2021 Mar;214(4):179-185
pubmed: 33538019