Risk Factors for Transurethral Coagulation for Hemostasis During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

Endoscopic hemostasis Holmium Laser coagulation Prostatectomy Transurethral resection of prostate

Journal

International neurourology journal
ISSN: 2093-4777
Titre abrégé: Int Neurourol J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101534513

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 29 12 2021
accepted: 01 03 2022
entrez: 6 7 2022
pubmed: 7 7 2022
medline: 7 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We aimed to identify risk factors for transurethral coagulation (TUC) using bipolar electrocautery for hemostasis during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We analyzed the clinical outcomes of HoLEP surgery performed by a single surgeon between January 2010 and April 2020 at the Seoul National University Hospital. Patient characteristics and perioperative parameters were used to identify the risk factors for TUC. The TUC group was defined as a case of conversion to hemostasis using electrocautery during the hemostasis step after enucleation. Of 1,563 patients, 357 underwent TUC (TUC group; 22.8%) as an adjuvant (n=299, 19.1%) or salvage (n=58, 3.7%) therapy. Patients in the TUC group were older (mean±standard deviation, 70.6±7.3 years vs. 69.3±7.0 years; P=0.002), had more 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) use (35.6% vs. 25.9%, P<0.001), higher serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (5.4 ±4.8 ng/mL vs. 3.8 ±4.5 ng/mL, P <0.001), larger total prostate volume (TPV) (89.5 ±44.7 mL vs. 66.0 ±32.6 mL, P<0.001), and larger transitional zone volume (TZV) (57.3±34.9 mL vs. 37.7±24.2 mL, P<0.001) than those who did not undergo TUC (non-TUC group). In univariate logistic regression analysis, age, 5-ARI use, PSA, TPV, and TZV correlated with TUC, whereas in multivariate logistic regression analysis, only TZV was associated with TUC. The odds ratios (ORs) of TUC were analyzed per TZV quartile. Compared to TZV<22.3 mL, the OR was 2.42 in 34.1 mL≤TZV<53.5 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-3.72; P<0.001), 5.17 in ≥53.5 mL (95% CI, 3.44-7.77; P<0.001). The risk of TUC during HoLEP surgery increases in patients with TZV >35 mL. Therefore, TUC may be potentially necessary in patients with a large transition zone volume in patients with BPH.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35793994
pii: inj.2142414.207
doi: 10.5213/inj.2142414.207
pmc: PMC9260329
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

153-160

Subventions

Organisme : Ministry of Science and ICT
Organisme : Information Technology Research Center
Organisme : InstituteInstitute for Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation
ID : IITP-2021-2018-0-01833

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Références

BJU Int. 2000 Jan;85(1):70-3
pubmed: 10619949
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1972-6
pubmed: 21944127
J Urol. 1993 Jun;149(6):1553-4
pubmed: 7684792
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Feb;212(2):244-50
pubmed: 21183365
Urology. 1996 Jan;47(1):48-51
pubmed: 8560662
J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):20-3
pubmed: 12478093
J Urol. 1984 Sep;132(3):474-9
pubmed: 6206240
J Urol. 1995 Nov;154(5):1764-9
pubmed: 7563342
Eur Urol. 2007 Nov;52(5):1456-63
pubmed: 17499427
BJU Int. 2012 Feb;109(3):408-11
pubmed: 21883820
Urology. 2001 Mar;57(3):454-8
pubmed: 11248619
Korean J Urol. 2015 Mar;56(3):218-26
pubmed: 25763126
J Urol. 1999 Apr;161(4):1174-9
pubmed: 10081864
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e84938
pubmed: 24465454
Int Neurourol J. 2014 Sep;18(3):138-44
pubmed: 25279241
J Endourol. 1999 Apr;13(3):181-90
pubmed: 10360498
Urology. 2002 Jul;60(1):152-6
pubmed: 12100945
Urology. 2014 Mar;83(3):581-5
pubmed: 24373317
Eur Urol. 2008 Jan;53(1):160-6
pubmed: 17869409
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 05;9(6):e98979
pubmed: 24901224
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0182230
pubmed: 28793314
Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Sep;60(5):333-342
pubmed: 31501795
J Endourol. 1998 Oct;12(5):457-9
pubmed: 9847070
Urology. 1999 Mar;53(3):581-9
pubmed: 10096388
World J Surg Oncol. 2003 Jun 6;1(1):6
pubmed: 12818001
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1012-6
pubmed: 15311026
J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1731-3
pubmed: 11912398
Urology. 2019 Sep;131:14-20
pubmed: 31129190
Urology. 2014 Sep;84(3):650-6
pubmed: 25168546

Auteurs

Hyun Sik Yoon (HS)

Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.

Min Hyuk Kim (MH)

Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Jae Suk Park (JS)

Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Min Soo Choo (MS)

Department of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Seong Jin Jeong (SJ)

Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Seung-June Oh (SJ)

Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Classifications MeSH