Distant metastasis without regional progression in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: case report and pooled analysis of literature.
Chemotherapy
Immunotherapy
Metastasectomy
Metastasis
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Radiotherapy
Journal
World journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1477-7819
Titre abrégé: World J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170544
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jul 2022
06 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
13
04
2022
accepted:
28
05
2022
entrez:
6
7
2022
pubmed:
7
7
2022
medline:
9
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represents the majority of bladder neoplasms. It is unusual for NMIBC metastasizing distantly without regional progression, namely metastatic NMIBC (mNMIBC), which is still poorly understood and easily omitted based on current management policies. So far, description of mNMIBC is limited to a few case reports. We reported a 70-year-old man with NMIBC who suffered from cervical metastasis without pelvic recurrence at 41 months after initial diagnosis. Then we performed a collective analysis of this case together with published mNMIBC cases searched from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, aiming to illustrate baseline clinicopathologic parameters, metastatic patterns, and treatment outcomes of these patients and analyze associated influencing factors. After scrupulous review, 45 cases previous reported and the one from our center were incorporated into the aggregated cohort of mNMIBC, including 34 males and 12 females. Primary tumors from 46.7% of patients were high-grade (HG) or grade 3 (G3) and 65.1% had T1 lesions. Aberrant biomarker expression was found in tumors of some cases. Most (40/46) metastases of mNMIBC occurred at a single site, mainly in lung, bone and lymph nodes. Apart from three cases of de novo mNMIBC, the mean metastasis-free survival (MFS) interval of metachronous mNMIBC was 42.5 months, which was obviously longer than conventional metastatic bladder cancer. Shortened MFS interval was associated with old age, T1 or HG/G3 primary tumors, and non-lung metastases. Systemic chemotherapy and metastasectomy or radiotherapy for oligometastatic lesion were main therapeutic approaches of mNMIBC, and immunotherapy was adopted for the case from our center. Lung and bone metastases correlated with relatively favorable and unfavorable survival outcomes, respectively. Compared with monotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy combined with local cytoreduction got more favorable outcomes. Although rare, mNMIBC occurs more in tumors with high-risk features. Usually, mNMIBC metastasizes later than conventional metastatic bladder cancer and manifests as solitary lesion. Outcomes of mNMIBC would be influenced by metastatic site and post-metastatic treatment. Systemic treatment combined with local cytoreduction may render survival benefit in selected patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represents the majority of bladder neoplasms. It is unusual for NMIBC metastasizing distantly without regional progression, namely metastatic NMIBC (mNMIBC), which is still poorly understood and easily omitted based on current management policies. So far, description of mNMIBC is limited to a few case reports.
METHODS
METHODS
We reported a 70-year-old man with NMIBC who suffered from cervical metastasis without pelvic recurrence at 41 months after initial diagnosis. Then we performed a collective analysis of this case together with published mNMIBC cases searched from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, aiming to illustrate baseline clinicopathologic parameters, metastatic patterns, and treatment outcomes of these patients and analyze associated influencing factors.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After scrupulous review, 45 cases previous reported and the one from our center were incorporated into the aggregated cohort of mNMIBC, including 34 males and 12 females. Primary tumors from 46.7% of patients were high-grade (HG) or grade 3 (G3) and 65.1% had T1 lesions. Aberrant biomarker expression was found in tumors of some cases. Most (40/46) metastases of mNMIBC occurred at a single site, mainly in lung, bone and lymph nodes. Apart from three cases of de novo mNMIBC, the mean metastasis-free survival (MFS) interval of metachronous mNMIBC was 42.5 months, which was obviously longer than conventional metastatic bladder cancer. Shortened MFS interval was associated with old age, T1 or HG/G3 primary tumors, and non-lung metastases. Systemic chemotherapy and metastasectomy or radiotherapy for oligometastatic lesion were main therapeutic approaches of mNMIBC, and immunotherapy was adopted for the case from our center. Lung and bone metastases correlated with relatively favorable and unfavorable survival outcomes, respectively. Compared with monotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy combined with local cytoreduction got more favorable outcomes.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Although rare, mNMIBC occurs more in tumors with high-risk features. Usually, mNMIBC metastasizes later than conventional metastatic bladder cancer and manifests as solitary lesion. Outcomes of mNMIBC would be influenced by metastatic site and post-metastatic treatment. Systemic treatment combined with local cytoreduction may render survival benefit in selected patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35794571
doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02664-5
pii: 10.1186/s12957-022-02664-5
pmc: PMC9258151
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
226Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81702507
Organisme : Climbing Talent Project of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital
ID : 2018SYPDRC046
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Cancer Cell. 2016 Jul 11;30(1):27-42
pubmed: 27321955
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Apr;15(4):251-259
pubmed: 29089607
Urol Oncol. 2021 Mar;39(3):195.e7-195.e13
pubmed: 33268275
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct 02;16(1):197
pubmed: 30285788
J Urol. 2021 Oct;206(4):873-884
pubmed: 34061567
World J Urol. 2014 Oct;32(5):1219-23
pubmed: 24166290
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 1;19(3):666-75
pubmed: 11157016
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan 15;16(1):6
pubmed: 29334958
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 27;12:832835
pubmed: 35155263
J Urol. 1999 Apr;161(4):1128-32
pubmed: 10081853
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 28;51(6):976-983
pubmed: 33558890
J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):423-31
pubmed: 20620393
J Urol. 1984 Nov;132(5):904-6
pubmed: 6492279
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 3;51(3):424-433
pubmed: 33319245
J Urol. 2020 Jan;203(1):62-72
pubmed: 31112107
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014 Jan;89(1):73-111
pubmed: 24029603
BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(7):1026-30
pubmed: 21883838
Eur Urol Focus. 2015 Aug;1(1):75-81
pubmed: 28723361
Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;39(8):497.e17-497.e22
pubmed: 33766464
World J Urol. 2021 Nov;39(11):4151-4158
pubmed: 34028594
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):961-969
pubmed: 28069289
Cell Prolif. 2007 Apr;40(2):157-65
pubmed: 17472724
Eur Urol. 1998;33(5):464-8
pubmed: 9643665
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul 15;18(1):166
pubmed: 32669107
Ann Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;30(11):1697-1727
pubmed: 31740927
World J Urol. 2020 Sep;38(9):2215-2220
pubmed: 31691083
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Aug 14;32:8-18
pubmed: 34667954
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 21;16(1):61
pubmed: 29562940
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1685-1694
pubmed: 29489427
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Jun;3(3):318-340
pubmed: 32201133
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):543-557
pubmed: 29122377
BMJ Case Rep. 2014 Sep 24;2014:
pubmed: 25253487
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;18(1):33
pubmed: 32041630
Cancer Manag Res. 2017 Nov 14;9:611-626
pubmed: 29180897
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):117-22
pubmed: 21178055
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep 25;12:301
pubmed: 25256383