Towards a framework for systematic reviews of the prevalence of exposure to environmental and occupational risk factors.
Environmental health
Exposures
Occupational health
Prevalence
Systematic review methods
Systematic reviews
Journal
Environmental health : a global access science source
ISSN: 1476-069X
Titre abrégé: Environ Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 07 2022
06 07 2022
Historique:
received:
21
02
2022
accepted:
27
06
2022
entrez:
6
7
2022
pubmed:
7
7
2022
medline:
9
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Exposure prevalence studies (as here defined) record the prevalence of exposure to environmental and occupational risk factors to human health. Applying systematic review methods to the synthesis of these studies would improve the rigour and transparency of normative products produced based on this evidence (e.g., exposure prevalence estimates). However, a dedicated framework, including standard methods and tools, for systematically reviewing exposure prevalence studies has yet to be created. We describe the need for this framework and progress made towards it through a series of such systematic reviews that the World Health Organization and the International Labour Organization conducted for their WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (WHO/ILO Joint Estimates).We explain that existing systematic review frameworks for environmental and occupational health cannot be directly applied for the generation of exposure prevalence estimates because they seek to synthesise different types of evidence (e.g., intervention or exposure effects on health) for different purposes (e.g., identify intervention effectiveness or exposure toxicity or carcinogenicity). Concepts unique to exposure prevalence studies (e.g., "expected heterogeneity": the real, non-spurious variability in exposure prevalence due to exposure changes over space and/or time) also require new assessment methods. A framework for systematic reviews of prevalence of environmental and occupational exposures requires adaptation of existing methods (e.g., a standard protocol) and development of new tools or approaches (e.g., for assessing risk of bias and certainty of a body of evidence, including exploration of expected heterogeneity).As part of the series of systematic reviews for the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates, the World Health Organization collaborating with partners has created a preliminary framework for systematic reviews of prevalence studies of exposures to occupational risk factors. This included development of protocol templates, data extraction templates, a risk of bias assessment tool, and an approach for assessing certainty of evidence in these studies. Further attention and efforts are warranted from scientific and policy communities, especially exposure scientists and policy makers, to establish a standard framework for comprehensive and transparent systematic reviews of studies estimating prevalence of exposure to environmental and occupational risk factors, to improve estimates, risk assessments and guidelines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35794579
doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00878-4
pii: 10.1186/s12940-022-00878-4
pmc: PMC9258093
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
64Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Environ Health Perspect. 2020 Sep;128(9):95002
pubmed: 32924579
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Aug 13;3(3):123-8
pubmed: 25197676
Environ Int. 2022 Mar;161:107136
pubmed: 35182944
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:617-29
pubmed: 26857180
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;65(9):934-9
pubmed: 22742910
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Oct;126(10):106001
pubmed: 30407086
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Apr;121(4):405-9
pubmed: 23380895
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):100
pubmed: 35387582
Environ Int. 2020 Feb;135:105039
pubmed: 31864023
Environ Int. 2022 Jan;158:107005
pubmed: 34991265
Environ Int. 2021 Oct;155:106605
pubmed: 34051644
Environ Int. 2020 Oct;143:105926
pubmed: 32653802