Induction of mastitis by cow-to-mouse fecal and milk microbiota transplantation causes microbiome dysbiosis and genomic functional perturbation in mice.
Cows
Dysbiosis
Feces
Mammary gland
Mastitis
Mice
Microbiomes
Milk
Transplantations
Journal
Animal microbiome
ISSN: 2524-4671
Titre abrégé: Anim Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101759457
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jul 2022
06 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
03
01
2022
accepted:
28
06
2022
entrez:
6
7
2022
pubmed:
7
7
2022
medline:
7
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mastitis pathogenesis involves a wide range of opportunistic and apparently resident microorganims including bacteria, viruses and archaea. In dairy animals, microbes reside in the host, interact with environment and evade the host immune system, providing a potential for host-tropism to favor mastitis pathogenesis. To understand the host-tropism phenomena of bovine-tropic mastitis microbiomes, we developed a cow-to-mouse mastitis model. A cow-to-mouse mastitis model was established by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and milk microbiota transplantation (MMT) to pregnant mice to assess microbiome dysbiosis and genomic functional perturbations through shotgun whole metagenome sequencing (WMS) along with histopathological changes in mice mammary gland and colon tissues. The cow-to-mouse FMT and MMT from clinical mastitis (CM) cows induced mastitis syndromes in mice as evidenced by histopathological changes in mammary gland and colon tissues. The WMS of 24 samples including six milk (CM = 3, healthy; H = 3), six fecal (CM = 4, H = 2) samples from cows, and six fecal (CM = 4, H = 2) and six mammary tissue (CM = 3, H = 3) samples from mice generating 517.14 million reads (average: 21.55 million reads/sample) mapped to 2191 bacterial, 94 viral and 54 archaeal genomes. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences (p = 0.009) in diversity, composition, and relative abundances in microbiomes between CM- and H-metagenomes. These differences in microbiome composition were mostly represented by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Lactobacillus crispatus, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterococcus faecalis, Pantoea dispersa in CM-cows (feces and milk), and Muribaculum spp., Duncaniella spp., Muribaculum intestinale, Bifidobacterium animalis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Massilia oculi, Ralstonia pickettii in CM-mice (feces and mammary tissues). Different species of Clostridia, Bacteroida, Actinobacteria, Flavobacteriia and Betaproteobacteria had a strong co-occurrence and positive correlation as the indicator species of murine mastitis. However, both CM cows and mice shared few mastitis-associated microbial taxa (1.14%) and functional pathways regardless of conservation of mastitis syndromes, indicating the higher discrepancy in mastitis-associated microbiomes among lactating mammals. We successfully induced mastitis by FMT and MMT that resulted in microbiome dysbiosis and genomic functional perturbations in mice. This study induced mastitis in a mouse model through FMT and MMT, which might be useful for further studies- focused on pathogen(s) involved in mastitis, their cross-talk among themselves and the host.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mastitis pathogenesis involves a wide range of opportunistic and apparently resident microorganims including bacteria, viruses and archaea. In dairy animals, microbes reside in the host, interact with environment and evade the host immune system, providing a potential for host-tropism to favor mastitis pathogenesis. To understand the host-tropism phenomena of bovine-tropic mastitis microbiomes, we developed a cow-to-mouse mastitis model.
METHODS
METHODS
A cow-to-mouse mastitis model was established by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and milk microbiota transplantation (MMT) to pregnant mice to assess microbiome dysbiosis and genomic functional perturbations through shotgun whole metagenome sequencing (WMS) along with histopathological changes in mice mammary gland and colon tissues.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The cow-to-mouse FMT and MMT from clinical mastitis (CM) cows induced mastitis syndromes in mice as evidenced by histopathological changes in mammary gland and colon tissues. The WMS of 24 samples including six milk (CM = 3, healthy; H = 3), six fecal (CM = 4, H = 2) samples from cows, and six fecal (CM = 4, H = 2) and six mammary tissue (CM = 3, H = 3) samples from mice generating 517.14 million reads (average: 21.55 million reads/sample) mapped to 2191 bacterial, 94 viral and 54 archaeal genomes. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences (p = 0.009) in diversity, composition, and relative abundances in microbiomes between CM- and H-metagenomes. These differences in microbiome composition were mostly represented by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Lactobacillus crispatus, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterococcus faecalis, Pantoea dispersa in CM-cows (feces and milk), and Muribaculum spp., Duncaniella spp., Muribaculum intestinale, Bifidobacterium animalis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Massilia oculi, Ralstonia pickettii in CM-mice (feces and mammary tissues). Different species of Clostridia, Bacteroida, Actinobacteria, Flavobacteriia and Betaproteobacteria had a strong co-occurrence and positive correlation as the indicator species of murine mastitis. However, both CM cows and mice shared few mastitis-associated microbial taxa (1.14%) and functional pathways regardless of conservation of mastitis syndromes, indicating the higher discrepancy in mastitis-associated microbiomes among lactating mammals.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We successfully induced mastitis by FMT and MMT that resulted in microbiome dysbiosis and genomic functional perturbations in mice. This study induced mastitis in a mouse model through FMT and MMT, which might be useful for further studies- focused on pathogen(s) involved in mastitis, their cross-talk among themselves and the host.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35794639
doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00193-w
pii: 10.1186/s42523-022-00193-w
pmc: PMC9258091
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
43Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Mar 28;15(4):5458-71
pubmed: 24686517
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217
pubmed: 23630581
Cells. 2020 Mar 18;9(3):
pubmed: 32197467
DNA Res. 2019 Oct 1;26(5):391-398
pubmed: 31364694
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 18;11(6):
pubmed: 34207278
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e85904
pubmed: 24465777
Nutrients. 2018 Nov 03;10(11):
pubmed: 30400268
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 May;80(10):3007-14
pubmed: 24610844
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Oct 07;33(17):5691-702
pubmed: 16214803
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2012 Jun;54(6):572-6
pubmed: 22443137
Microbiome. 2018 Nov 8;6(1):200
pubmed: 30409169
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Aug;92(8):3800-9
pubmed: 19620662
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2019 Sep;51(7):2057-2066
pubmed: 31073889
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Aug 26;11:720790
pubmed: 34513733
PeerJ. 2014 Aug 05;2:e494
pubmed: 25165621
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 10;7(1):7804
pubmed: 28798374
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 25;10(3):e0120605
pubmed: 25807542
mSystems. 2018 Oct 9;3(5):
pubmed: 30320222
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 25;8(4):e61959
pubmed: 23634219
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jun 03;11:860
pubmed: 32582039
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170668
pubmed: 28129375
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D590-D595
pubmed: 30321428
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2015 Jan;47(1):79-86
pubmed: 25326717
Dis Model Mech. 2015 Jan;8(1):1-16
pubmed: 25561744
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 25;10:1378
pubmed: 31293535
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Feb 18;22(4):
pubmed: 33670766
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 21;8(1):18026
pubmed: 30575793
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 21;13(3):e0193671
pubmed: 29561873
Genomics. 2020 Nov;112(6):5188-5203
pubmed: 32966856
Int J Vet Sci Med. 2016 Dec 10;4(2):63-70
pubmed: 30255040
Front Microbiol. 2020 Aug 26;11:1983
pubmed: 32983010
PLoS Pathog. 2015 Jun 11;11(6):e1004833
pubmed: 26066650
Benef Microbes. 2016 Feb;7(1):95-102
pubmed: 26449342
Front Immunol. 2014 Oct 07;5:493
pubmed: 25339959
Arch Microbiol. 2022 Sep 8;204(10):608
pubmed: 36075991
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Dec;101(12):10605-10625
pubmed: 30292553
Mol Biol Rep. 2014 Dec;41(12):8293-301
pubmed: 25205126
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1399:207-33
pubmed: 26791506
Microbiologyopen. 2016 Feb;5(1):70-82
pubmed: 26541370
Microorganisms. 2021 Sep 17;9(9):
pubmed: 34576870
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 19;8(1):15479
pubmed: 30341386
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1277
pubmed: 31244801
Gut Microbes. 2017 May 4;8(3):238-252
pubmed: 28609251
Benef Microbes. 2015;6(4):485-90
pubmed: 25711409
Front Vet Sci. 2020 May 15;7:239
pubmed: 32500086
Pathog Dis. 2016 Apr;74(3):
pubmed: 26772653
Curr Microbiol. 2019 Sep;76(9):1082-1086
pubmed: 30443686
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 10;10(9):
pubmed: 32927884
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 21;10(1):5288
pubmed: 31754112
J Hum Lact. 2015 Aug;31(3):406-15
pubmed: 25948578
Gut Microbes. 2013 Mar-Apr;4(2):136-9
pubmed: 23235404
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Gigascience. 2020 Oct 15;9(10):
pubmed: 33057676
Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010 Jan;2010(1):pdb.prot5368
pubmed: 20150127
Arch Surg. 1970 Oct;101(4):478-83
pubmed: 5457245
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 29;10(12):e0144831
pubmed: 26713450
Nat Rev Immunol. 2013 May;13(5):321-35
pubmed: 23618829
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 19;9(1):13536
pubmed: 31537825
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Jun;20(6):341-355
pubmed: 30918369
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 03;6:27427
pubmed: 27255518
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2015 Mar;31(1):17-46, v
pubmed: 25705024
Anim Microbiome. 2021 Apr 21;3(1):31
pubmed: 33883031
ISME J. 2020 Jul;14(7):1897-1910
pubmed: 32341472
Vet World. 2020 Dec;13(12):2713-2727
pubmed: 33487990
Poult Sci. 2013 Mar;92(3):671-83
pubmed: 23436518
J Anim Sci. 2022 Jan 1;100(1):
pubmed: 34791313
Anim Microbiome. 2020 Apr 14;2(1):11
pubmed: 33499931
Cell. 2012 Aug 3;150(3):470-80
pubmed: 22863002
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 10;10(1):21608
pubmed: 33303769
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jun;101(6):4729-4746
pubmed: 29525302
Int J Vet Sci Med. 2018 Apr 05;6(1):53-60
pubmed: 30255079
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 May 18;7:194
pubmed: 28573110
Microbiome. 2013 May 03;1(1):14
pubmed: 24450613
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 5;11(1):19777
pubmed: 34611238
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 28;10(1):18521
pubmed: 33116172
ISME J. 2011 Apr;5(4):639-49
pubmed: 20962874
Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2018 Jan;9(1):
pubmed: 28990312
Clin Endosc. 2016 May;49(3):257-65
pubmed: 26956193