Correlation between self-efficacy, fear of movement, empowerment, enablement, and number of visits to physiotherapist among patients with musculoskeletal disorders in primary health care: a feasibility study.
Feasibility studies
Musculoskeletal diseases
Physical therapists
Primary health care
Self-efficacy
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jul 2022
06 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
08
05
2020
accepted:
23
06
2022
entrez:
6
7
2022
pubmed:
7
7
2022
medline:
7
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Musculoskeletal disorders are a costly burden for health care and social care services. Patients with musculoskeletal disorders are often treated by physiotherapists in primary health care. Psychosocial variables can be a significant obstacle to recovering from musculoskeletal injuries. The primary aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of performing a prospective study investigating whether self-efficacy, fear of movement, empowerment, or enablement has any relation to the number of visits to physiotherapists among patients with a musculoskeletal disorder in primary health care. Prospective study with a consecutive selection including eleven female and eight male patients age ranged between 22 and 82 years old seeking physiotherapist for the first time for a musculoskeletal disorder in primary health care. Primary outcome measures included operational and practical feasibility regarding recruitment of participants, use of questionnaires, and key variables to be collected as part of the study. Secondary outcomes included the correlation between self-efficacy (Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES-S)), fear of movement (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-SV)), empowerment (Making Decisions Scale), enablement (Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI)), and the number of visits to physiotherapists. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS statistics version 28 with analysis of correlation using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Nineteen patients accepted to participate in the study and were included in the final analysis. Between 14 and 18 completed questionnaires were included. There was a statistically significant correlation between the number of visits to the physiotherapist and self-efficacy, rho=0.692 and p=0.006. The results of the study showed that the design is feasible in terms of recruitment of participants and use of questionnaires. New variables to collect in a large-scale study were identified. In a large-scale study, attention needs to be focused on the improvement of the number of completed questionnaires. The results of this study indicate that the present care of patients with a low level of self-efficacy is not optimal.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Musculoskeletal disorders are a costly burden for health care and social care services. Patients with musculoskeletal disorders are often treated by physiotherapists in primary health care. Psychosocial variables can be a significant obstacle to recovering from musculoskeletal injuries. The primary aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of performing a prospective study investigating whether self-efficacy, fear of movement, empowerment, or enablement has any relation to the number of visits to physiotherapists among patients with a musculoskeletal disorder in primary health care.
METHODS
METHODS
Prospective study with a consecutive selection including eleven female and eight male patients age ranged between 22 and 82 years old seeking physiotherapist for the first time for a musculoskeletal disorder in primary health care. Primary outcome measures included operational and practical feasibility regarding recruitment of participants, use of questionnaires, and key variables to be collected as part of the study. Secondary outcomes included the correlation between self-efficacy (Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES-S)), fear of movement (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-SV)), empowerment (Making Decisions Scale), enablement (Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI)), and the number of visits to physiotherapists. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS statistics version 28 with analysis of correlation using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Nineteen patients accepted to participate in the study and were included in the final analysis. Between 14 and 18 completed questionnaires were included. There was a statistically significant correlation between the number of visits to the physiotherapist and self-efficacy, rho=0.692 and p=0.006.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the study showed that the design is feasible in terms of recruitment of participants and use of questionnaires. New variables to collect in a large-scale study were identified. In a large-scale study, attention needs to be focused on the improvement of the number of completed questionnaires. The results of this study indicate that the present care of patients with a low level of self-efficacy is not optimal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35794659
doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01101-4
pii: 10.1186/s40814-022-01101-4
pmc: PMC9258183
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
141Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Sep;61(9):933-6
pubmed: 20810594
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Sep 3;51(8):587-597
pubmed: 31198975
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 28;22(1):910
pubmed: 34711194
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Dec;15(4):475-89
pubmed: 16254750
Am J Community Psychol. 1987 Apr;15(2):121-48
pubmed: 3604997
Clin Rehabil. 2010 May;24(5):422-30
pubmed: 20442254
Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S243-55
pubmed: 26994264
Eur J Pain. 2002;6(5):375-85
pubmed: 12160512
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Dec;31(6):1091-3
pubmed: 12540696
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Nov;89(2):337-44
pubmed: 22959333
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(22):2130-4
pubmed: 25572319
Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):165-71
pubmed: 9613486
J Pain. 2014 Aug;15(8):800-14
pubmed: 24878675
Eur J Pain. 2011 Sep;15(8):775.e1-11
pubmed: 21354838
Scand J Caring Sci. 2005 Mar;19(1):32-8
pubmed: 15737163
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 01;4(6):1570-3
pubmed: 21129355
Phys Ther. 2011 Mar;91(3):330-45
pubmed: 21233306
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017
pubmed: 33275908
Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):131-7
pubmed: 22507363
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 13;12:157
pubmed: 22694747
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):2458-65
pubmed: 15507811
Br J Sports Med. 2019 May;53(9):554-559
pubmed: 29666064
Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Aug;48(8):1042-7
pubmed: 9255837
J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Dec;17(4):610-22
pubmed: 17955347
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):325-332
pubmed: 27538347
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):581-624
pubmed: 17592957
Physiother Can. 2010 Summer;62(3):180-9
pubmed: 21629595
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Aug 14;14:116
pubmed: 23941606
Phys Ther. 2014 Dec;94(12):1785-95
pubmed: 25082921
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239
pubmed: 27777223
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(12):1829-43
pubmed: 9447632
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 1;20(1):186
pubmed: 31043169
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Mar 04;16:31
pubmed: 25879632
Fam Pract. 2013 Oct;30(5):506-13
pubmed: 23825186
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 02;11:144
pubmed: 20598124