The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review.

gender gender stereotypes learning environment pedagogical agent systematic review virtual agent

Journal

Frontiers in artificial intelligence
ISSN: 2624-8212
Titre abrégé: Front Artif Intell
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101770551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 26 01 2022
accepted: 19 05 2022
entrez: 7 7 2022
pubmed: 8 7 2022
medline: 8 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Virtual learning environments often use virtual characters to facilitate and improve the learning process. These characters, known as pedagogical agents, can take on different roles, such as tutors or companions. Research has highlighted the importance of various characteristics of virtual agents, including their voice or non-verbal behaviors. Little attention has been paid to the gender-specific design of pedagogical agents, although gender has an important influence on the educational process. In this article, we perform an extensive review of the literature regarding the impact of the gender of pedagogical agents on academic outcomes. Based on a detailed review of 59 articles, we analyze the influence of pedagogical agents' gender on students' academic self-evaluations and achievements to answer the following questions: (1) Do students perceive virtual agents differently depending on their own gender and the gender of the agent? (2) Does the gender of pedagogical agents influence students' academic performance and self-evaluations? (3) Are there tasks or academic situations to which a male virtual agent is better suited than a female virtual agent, and vice versa, according to empirical evidence? (4) How do a virtual agent's pedagogical roles impact these results? (5) How do a virtual agent's appearance and interactive capacities impact these results? (6) Are androgynous virtual agents a potential solution to combatting gender stereotypes? This review provides important insight to researchers on how to approach gender when designing pedagogical agents in virtual learning environments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35795011
doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.862997
pmc: PMC9251372
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

862997

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Armando, Ochs and Régner.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Apr;42(2):155-62
pubmed: 4823550
Br J Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;50(3):536-43
pubmed: 21453310
Am Psychol. 2020 Apr;75(3):301-315
pubmed: 31318237
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Nov;69(5):797-811
pubmed: 7473032
Health Commun. 2022 Aug;37(9):1123-1134
pubmed: 33876658
Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):1123-35
pubmed: 21038941
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Oct;22(10):634-640
pubmed: 31580726
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 5;9(1):8291
pubmed: 31165754
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Sep;85(3):440-52
pubmed: 14498781

Auteurs

Marjorie Armando (M)

Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LIS UMR 7020, Marseille, France.
Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPC, Marseille, France.
Pôle pilote Ampiric, Institut National Supérieur du Professorat et de l'Éducation, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

Magalie Ochs (M)

Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LIS UMR 7020, Marseille, France.

Isabelle Régner (I)

Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPC, Marseille, France.

Classifications MeSH