Simulation in Perioperative Liver Transplant Anesthesia: A Systematic Review.
anesthesia
education
liver transplant
liver transplant anesthesiologist
medical residency
peri-operative care
simulation
surgery
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
accepted:
02
06
2022
entrez:
7
7
2022
pubmed:
8
7
2022
medline:
8
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Due to the complexity of liver transplant patients and the variability in exposure to transplantation by anesthesia trainees, simulation is often required as an adjunct to clinical experience. This systematic review identifies current simulation models in the literature that pertain to perioperative liver transplant anesthesia. Data were collected by performing an electronic search of the PubMed and Scopus databases for articles describing simulation in transplant anesthesia. Abstracts were screened using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Three reviewers analyzed 16 abstracts found in the search and agreed upon articles that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. A total of five publications met the inclusion criteria; they could be grouped as cognitive skills and technical skills simulators. Cognitive skills simulators utilized high-fidelity mannequins and animal models combined with traditional educational material to enhance pattern recognition of critical complications during liver transplantation. One manuscript focused on a technical skills acquisition by utilizing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to identify intraoperative pathologies. There is a heterogeneity in the exposure to liver transplant care during anesthesia training. Simulation provides low-stakes exposure to the high-stakes skills required in the operating room. Hence, it can be used as an adjunct to improve both cognitive and technical skill acquisition for perioperative transplant anesthesia. The goal of these simulation programs is to improve patient outcomes and produce more capable anesthesiologists.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35795521
doi: 10.7759/cureus.25602
pmc: PMC9250322
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e25602Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Oh et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):727-34
pubmed: 26485205
Teach Learn Med. 2001 Spring;13(2):92-6
pubmed: 11302037
J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Jan;33(1):27-32
pubmed: 24371095
Liver Transpl. 2015 Jan;21(1):89-95
pubmed: 25283640
N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 12;351(7):647-56
pubmed: 15306666
Am J Surg. 2012 Jan;203(1):8-13
pubmed: 22088268
Chest. 2010 May;137(5):1050-6
pubmed: 20061397
Liver Transpl. 2013 Apr;19(4):425-30
pubmed: 23447113
Cureus. 2022 Apr 27;14(4):e24531
pubmed: 35651377
Anaesthesia. 2008 Apr;63(4):364-9
pubmed: 18336486
Am J Med Qual. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):242-6
pubmed: 23847083
Clin Transplant. 2012 Jul-Aug;26(4):564-70
pubmed: 22211653
Liver Transpl. 2017 Apr;23(4):430-439
pubmed: 28133947
Med Educ. 2011 Nov;45(11):1147
pubmed: 21936870
Int Surg. 2015 Apr;100(4):672-7
pubmed: 25875549
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Sep;17(3):180-94
pubmed: 23482506
Simul Healthc. 2016 Dec;11(6):376-384
pubmed: 27504890
J Educ Perioper Med. 2021 Oct 01;23(4):E672
pubmed: 34966826
Cureus. 2022 Apr 6;14(4):e23883
pubmed: 35530913
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:4237523
pubmed: 26949389
Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):502-9; discussion 509-11
pubmed: 21865947